samarakroeger's reviews
279 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
if you liked Still Life by Sarah Winman, you'll love this. very similar books in many ways (with different settings and plots, obviously).
Graphic: Alcoholism, Medical content, Police brutality, Terminal illness, Mass/school shootings, Gun violence, Abandonment, Animal cruelty, Chronic illness, Death, Grief, Homophobia, Pregnancy, Infidelity, Suicidal thoughts, and Suicide
3.0
Anyways, with the audiobook playing at 3x speed, I somehow didn't stop listening despite actively disagreeing and disliking the approach she took, so there must be something to this. She does a good job at citing and quoting other feminist writers and thinkers. I know I typically want my nonfiction to feature the author a bit more, but in this case I wanted less of Nona's personal life stuffed in. This was half memoir, half feminist thought piece, and I badly wanted it to commit more to one or the other.
Graphic: Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Domestic abuse, Sexism, Death of parent, Gaslighting, Homophobia, Rape, Sexual assault, and Abortion
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Gun violence, Murder, Violence, Racial slurs, Death, Racism, Hate crime, and Police brutality
3.0
not really my thing but I’m sure many people find it comforting and quaint. I just happen to not seek out those qualities in my reading (which probably says more about me than anything).
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
anywho, probably going to check out more of Jimenez's other work now, despite the narrative style.
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, Domestic abuse, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Toxic friendship, and Classism
2.5
Furthermore, this needed more editorial oversight on the big picture side of things. I would have actively advocated for a stronger narrative pull, a more concentrated focus and scope, and a clearer organizational strategy. I would have welcomed more personal intrusions into the narrative from de Jong himself, as he clearly has a vested interest in the subject.
It’s clear that a lot of research went into this book, but I’m pretty sure most readers could have done with less listing off of specific deals and trades that don’t actively build up the primary narrative. It felt like only a person fascinated by ticker tape or something equally banal would have not gotten completely lost in the weeds.
The end of the book, exploring the Nuremberg Trials through today, was more interesting but a little underdeveloped. I kept wanting to hear about the why instead of just the what. Why should we care? What is significant about this legacy? How will this issue continue to manifest itself in the future? These are pretty basic questions I think any nonfiction writer should ask themselves throughout the writing process and absolutely should be addressed in the conclusion.
4.0
I'm really glad I'm not a woman born in Georgian England without any real sense of agency. I hate relying on men. Long live the spinster union!
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Honestly, the writing was pretty good. Capote does have a way with words (if you ignore the slurs), but to me it felt like a pale imitation of Fitzgerald. Really, a lot of the aspects of Breakfast at Tiffany's feel like they were heavily lifted from other works, including from Isherwood and Fitzgerald (who I both consider to be far superior writers). How did this novella come to be considered an American classic ... I think it was purely because of the association with the (incredibly loose) movie adaptation.
overall, just kinda bleh. it needed to actually say something, but it really didn't. Michael C. Hall did a great job narrating the audiobook, though.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Racial slurs, Racism, Ableism, and Homophobia
4.75
Of course, five years after #metoo, I knew where the story would end up, but that did not detract from my engagement with the plot. It is also very important for us to see how difficult it was to break the Harvey Weinstein story within NBC, the very real threats made against journalists, and how enmeshed all top execs (across industries) are in this big cabal to keep victims silenced.
I did wish Ronan Farrow did not attempt to do accents for all the quotes - they were mediocre and distracting. He comes off as a bit self-righteous at times, but honestly, I kind of think he deserves to be.
One of the most engagingly written pieces of investigative journalism I've read. I do read around 30% nonfiction, and Farrow wrote this in a way that I think fiction readers would not find intimidating. To all the readers out there scared by nonfiction: pick this up. You won't regret it.
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Gaslighting, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Stalking, Suicidal thoughts, Sexism, and Self harm