Scan barcode
sauvageloup's reviews
526 reviews
4.0
pros:
- the writing is clear, fun and includes lots of words I didn't know. it bounces along and jumps from topic to topic in a way that's fun.
- it was very interesting to learn more about Judaism and margoyles' experience of it, her family and her upbringing. for a majority of it, she is more informative than anything and quite moving at times
- I enjoyed all her stories and found her mixture of totally blunt honesty and older person views interesting
- her politics align very much with mine and it was good to hear her views on Israel and Palestine - the book was published in 2021, so she was unfortunately before her time in predicting the war between them.
- i liked hearing her views on fatness, death, beauty and aging, among other not talked about topics. she is wonderfully open about being queer and I liked how she never hid that she'd had relations with men and didnt let loving two men in her life make her any less of a lesbian.
cons:
- at times, I didn't agree with her black and white view, she stresses being kind (quite rightly) but is judgemental against people who use grammar differently, against pop music, Harry Potter fans (fair enough with j k Rowling but she just said the fans were too old for it, despite admitting she'd never seen the films or read the books), and also doesn't believe in coming out to people 'who cant cope with it'. often her stories involved saying something potentially pretty hurtful to someone because of her lack of filter which didnt seem kind.
- the topic jumps were also a bit jarring at times and I felt the first half had much more flow than the second.
- I also got bored when she spoke for a long time about people and scenes, big lists of films and people I had never heard of, but that's probably my age.
overall, I found her interesting and charming and enjoyed learning about her life.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
pros:
- there was a lot of twists and turns
- it definitely gathered momentum, with the ending being climatic and the riots mirroring Paige's memories; there was a good sense of everything linking together in this book.
- I was gripped by all the drama, even in the earlier parts of the book, and the writing was good, clear and vivid. I liked how Shannon used the slang and created new words, and it felt less muddling in this book. I could definitely imagine the different cities and how they'd been changed by Scion.
- I like how fleshed out the main characters are and how they have their own motivations and wants separate to Paige
- Of course I enjoyed the magical/spiritual/fantasy aspects, and the angst and whump towards the end which was intense.
cons:
- I felt that the narrative was a bit disjointed with the different events and Paige travelling around the country. She didnt seem to finish what she started in Manchester and it didnt feel very satisfying in the middle of the book, though I was still keen to read it.
- Paige very much frustrated me at the start
- certain plot points, like the underground sewer ppl seemed too convenient at times, as well as how Paige received info.
- I felt Paige was foolish a lot of times too
but overall, I did enjoy it a lot and will def read the next one.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
pros:
- very gripping! I read this in two halves - a library copy in Newcastle and an ebook borrowed from my friend in Birmingham - and I was hooked on the book throughout.
- the pacing felt so much better than book 1, which seemed to tumble from one event to another. this one swelled in tension all the way through, steadily building to the finale,
- the mystery was gripping in itself, as Paige tried to figure out
- Shannon's writing felt just as good, if not better, the settings painted vividly and the tension set very well.
- I liked that Warden gave us some more background context when it came to his history and the history of how the Rephaim got involved with human affairs.
cons:
- again, I did get muddled with the sheer amount of terms, worldbuilding and characters. I forgot the names of the voyants who made it out of the penal colony and
- I felt that the characters relationships definitely took a massive step back in this one, which was primarily about Paige figuring stuff out and coming into her power.
overall, a very good and gripping follow up to book 1 and I cant wait to read the next one!
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
pros:
- the worldbuilding is very imaginative, with the whole mix of clairvoyance, angels, emim, ghosts/poltergeists and rephaium. I liked all the different types of clairvoyance and reading about Paige using her gift. the Rephs were also imaginative, seeming to be a strange mix of vampire/angel/demon/clairvoyant.
- I thought the main relationships, friendship and romance, were nicely built up and not rushed, but sign posted well.
- the writing was overall clear and gripping with moments of being poetic. i wanted to keep reading, once I was 50 or so pages in.
- I did like the side characters, Liss, julian, seb and Michael were all interesting.
cons:
- the biggest issue I think was the feeling that the plot wandered too much. it felt like we tumbled from one event to another without any particular structure, and so the tension felt off, as big events happened without any build up.
- lost track of who everyone was with such a big cast, and I was also still unsure about what exact powers paige and the rephs had.
- it felt like there were a lot of holes in explanations, with a lot of slang used without being explained. a certain amount makes sense, but I feel that it tipped over into too much. i had a lot of questions and even when there were answers, they seemed somewhat arbitrary. also why was Arcturus still being called Warden at the end?
- there was also a big worldbuilding dump at the start, which I was told about and wasnt too bad, but it definitely could've been handled smoother.
- also, if I'm being honest, I didnt find paige very interesting. yes shes spunky and she is shown as being kind to Seb, Liss and Julian, and yet she still felt extremely 2D, I didnt really feel for her as a full person and the emotional impact of some events was definitely lessened bc of it.
(- I'm definitely curious to see what Shannon changed in her new rewriting of the book)
overall, a gripping and pretty original thriller, but with some shaky plotting and too big cast. but I've got the mime order and will most likely be reading it!
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Child death, Confinement, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Slavery, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Police brutality, Kidnapping, Grief, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
pros:
- they're definitely gripping, and the writing style is sparse but clear and evocative, with the descriptions being vivid.
- the stories felt self contained and satisfying overall, even as many ended in tragedy.
- the last book of short stories I read, i struggled to jump from one story to another, maybe because they were so different and by different people. this one wasnt like that at all, and i had no problem reading straight through, pretty much.
- i liked the variety in length and themes of the stories, from birth horror, to supernatural, to fantasy fairy tale and modern criticisms on feminism and capitalism. i think i mainly read very on the surface and didnt look hard at metaphors and such, a reread might help me see this more.
- I liked the sheer imagination though and how Chung makes you care for characters who often arent even given a name.
cons:
- the first two stories especially, but a lot of them overall, were pretty horrible and graphic. they did their job in making you feel things! but it reminded me too much of just horrible nightmares and intrusive thoughts and I wouldnt read those two again.
- I also felt there was generally a lack of hope in the stories, but that's personal taste I guess.
overall, well written and gripping but too horror for me and dont think I'll seek out more of her work, but I might reread this in time.
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Gore, Incest, Infertility, Infidelity, Mental illness, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Slavery, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Terminal illness, Torture, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Excrement, Vomit, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, Car accident, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, and Sexual harassment
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
pros:
- writing is poignant, powerful and weaves a compelling narrative, while never being especially verbose or wandering too far. The dialogue felt real enough for the period, but still intense and readable.
- the characters were all brilliant, they come to life gradually and several change over the period of the story,
- Lisbet showed great growth
- the setting, the history and the depiction of the dancing mania was all extremely evocative and intense, I could picture it all so well and you feel as if you're down there in the pulsing, dangerous crowds, or drowning in the smell of melting beeswax.
- lisbet's alliance with the bees and later the dog, Ulf, added another beautiful layer to her character and her skills as a beekeeper helped her realise her own worth, beyond being a wife and a mother.
- I loved the women's friendships, Lisbet's true love for Ida despite her mixture of jealousy and awe towards her friend, and Nethe's developing care and love for Lisbet, despite her initial fear of closeness.
- the significant tragedies of the book are balanced with successes, which stopped me from feeling betrayed at the end, which I sometimes am with tragic books. bitter sweet, I can do!
- Plater's grim awfulness is written in a way that is familiar but still ghastly, and the dread of his arrival is tangible every time he arrives.
cons:
-
- also wish that the role of the eldest daughter as a replacement mother might have been examined a little.
-
- it was of course upsetting, though somewhat expected from how saintly she is set up as, that Ida died. as Lisbet and Eren survived, couldnt Nethe and Ida have? it fitted with the story ofc, but it's a shame that it continues the 'bury your gays'
overall, I truly loved this haunting, sad, and powerful historical novel about the power of female friendship and love against loss, hardships and intolerance.
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Gore, Hate crime, Homophobia, Infertility, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Sexual content, Suicide, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Xenophobia, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, Lesbophobia, Fire/Fire injury, Outing, War, Injury/Injury detail, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Moderate: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Mental illness, Miscarriage, Police brutality, Medical content, and Alcohol
4.0
pros:
- a lot of really interesting information throughout, on fungi (obviously), lichen, ecosystems, the history of evolution, and how mycology is studied and used today.
- 90% of it I didnt know, but was explained in very accessible terms, with everything clearly defined. the footnotes were more complex and required some googling, but were also very interesting.
- I liked how he talked us through the development of the field, and the history of how fungi helped the rest of the world grow, exploring older lines of thought before bringing us to the present.
- the environmental applications for fungi tech is huge, and theres still so much unknown, it creates both frustration and excitement, as Sheldrake says.
- the writing is poetic and striking, making use of visual language, his own experiences and emotions, complex and far ranging metaphors, and how they affect how we view fungi.
- I liked how he pulled from everything from neural networks, to queer theory to computing, it was interesting to view fungi from all different sides.
- I also really enjoyed the section on radical mycology, with the teams of amateur mycologists around the world coming together to help with discoveries and creating environmental solutions.
cons:
- I felt at times that Sheldrake's biases came through, that sometimes he gave options of different theories or thoughts, but not always, and he seemed to dismiss some very fast. I would have been interested to read some more contradictory arguments.
- sometimes I did get confused, the writing was academic in places, but I think that's fair, it's an in depth book. the metaphors were maybe a little strong at times, but mostly I enjoyed them.
- I would have enjoyed more pictures or illustrations (though the ones we got were great), so I can understand why he's put out an illustrated version.
overall, fascinating facts and exploration of a huge range of topics - fungi is really so wide and Sheldrake did a great deep dive into lots of aspects. would certainly read other books like it, or more of his work.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
pros:
- the writing flows well, is light and amusing and plows along with all Eddie' eagerness. I liked the banter and the dialogue, the descriptions were visual and conjured up vivid scenes, especially Saint Bede's island in the dark, Rose's appearance, the clothing, the crumbling house, etc.
- I really liked Eddie and Rose as main characters, and all the side characters are fleshed out and real, with all their depths and foibles.
- the characters of Kitty, Valentine, Dayo, Liza, Albert, etc. all had their own motivations and quirks, and their own relationship with the other characters, including Nash. Dayo's campaign to bring about abolition was a good inclusion, and we got to hear about Kitty's passion for painting, Albert's rabbits (a reoccurring joke that I nonetheless thought wholesome). Juno the dog was even a fun character in herself, though I rather expected her to dig up some ominous bone or get stuck or find a ghost in the forest.
- I liked the setting and the Regency time period, with the contrasts of different levels of proprietary and the dropping in of real historical people, like Shelley and Byron.
-
- I liked Eddie and Rose's different journeys and how they found themselves at different times. their friendship/budding romance was so well written, i loved the ebb and flow and the depiction of their tension, quarrels, intimacy, sexual attraction, forgiveness, etc. That was so well done.
cons:
- the start felt slow and a bit shallow. I didnt much like Eddie at all and it was all too Brigerton at that point. it really picked up for me as Eddie got drawn in and the stakes went up, with more dark edges to Nash and debauchery.
- I thought there was a real lack of resolution with Henry and Nash both. I wish Henry could have challenged Nate about the locket, his mother, and the assault. I felt it was glossed over that Nash sexually assaulted Henry, though that threat lingers in the latter half of the book against Eddie. It was left unclear whether anyone got shot with the pistol and I'm not sure Eddie got to see Henry after that. that was a bit of hanging loose end unless we're meant to think that Nash murdered Henry and just cleared him away, which doesn't seem likely, but if it was then....
- it's frustrating that Nash never got any more severe punishment for stealing Eddie's manuscript, lying, cheating on Liza, verbally abusing Eddie, nonconsensually kissing her, and force feeding her drugs... she should have slapped him at least, and then got him denounced in the papers. instead we get a lacklustre end note. guess I'm more vengeful but I definitely didnt feel he got taught any lesson!
but overall, this was a thrilling and gripping ride with great writing and I enjoyed it :)
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal death, Cursing, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Gaslighting, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, and Classism
Moderate: Addiction, Death, Gun violence, Racism, Grief, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
4.5
pros:
- I knew quite a bit already about the dogs and Niall's work from his Instagram, so the story of his life was the most interesting and also very heart wrenching. You can feel his past pain and struggling through the page, though he tells it quite factually.
- I was surprised by his employment and business past, mixing with the rich and being a chef and business owner, which showed how he's always been a massive go getter and extremely determined, even when dealing with his own demons. his self reflection and plainness in facing his dark side is humbling to read.
- his love of the dogs shines through and I liked reading about how he keeps his spirits up when things go wrong with the dogs. you really root for his success, as his real passion is evident.
cons:
- only slight con was a bit of repetitiveness I felt in how each section discussed the dogs, and the timeline was a little confusing at times. But otherwise, the story was clear and touching.
overall, enjoyed it and appreciated the message of hope and perseverance. definitely invested in Niall's work and appreciate him even more.
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Cancer, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Drug use, Suicidal thoughts, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
pros:
- the language and descriptions and some dialogue is just beautiful. its like poetry, the turns of phase and the raw appreciation of life and nature the symbiotic relationship between humans and earth, and how death feeds life.
- connecting to, the kakuy being a wonderful creation, and i liked how North stressed how they simply *were* nature, in all its indifferent glory, and not gods that cared or noticed humans at all. but that humans should care for them, simply because they come from the earth that gives us life. they make for a great vehicle for metaphor and musings on protecting nature and climate change, and being a tiny part of a huge thing, but also becoming that huge thing itself by being subsumed by it.
- the complicated and very human relationship that Ven had with Georg was powerful, how he completely disavowed his tormentor, his enemy, his captor, and everything Georg stood for, and yet still had a connection with him as a fellow human and could see who Georg might've been in a different life. it showed how the worse evil is created by normal men.
- the other worldbuilding was fascinating, with the eco tech, some of which is familiar and some not, but feels realistic. there is a kind of speculative fiction feel to it, as well as magical realism. also seeing our own time (or a hundred years in our future) through their eyes was really interesting and I liked how they talked about both the sacredness of normal human belongings and rubbish, as well as the pollution of those same things.
- I liked the nonbinary chatacter Lah very much
- I liked the way Ven's quiet strength and persistent compassion was described and emerged later in the book (I loathed him as a spineless traitor at the start, hes a very unreliable narrator), and there is a thread of hope that it is the character who sees the humanity in everyone and resists destruction as far as possible is the one to survive all the atrocities he suffers.
cons
- my biggest issue was the slowness. whilst i loved sections of the descriptions and contemplation, it was repeated too often for me and it dragged the pace. the only times i was absolutely engaged was during the action scenes, everything else felt like a sometimes frustratingly slow meander through plot points.
- i also got confused. it didnt help that i had gaps in between reading, so I'm sure i forgot stuff, but i wad very lost near the beginning
- I got confused with names in general, there are a LOT and place names. a map would have been so helpful.
-
overall, a tricky and slow, but also beautiful, original and poignant novel about humanity and the environment.
Graphic: Body horror, Confinement, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Physical abuse, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Violence, Blood, Police brutality, Kidnapping, Grief, Murder, Alcohol, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury and Pandemic/Epidemic