A lot of the stories have an interesting premise: a couple planning a wedding that's getting increasingly extravagant, a group of friends who suddenly get superpowers, a scientist jumping between universes. Bob-Waksberg is able to take the surreal world of his characters and make it seem normal to us, enough that we focus more on the characters' grounded, all-too-human flaws and emotions. Some stories, like We Men of Science and rufus, I thoroughly enjoyed - they were written with unique perspectives on love and relationships.
However, there were more pieces that felt like filler or fluff, like Lies We Told Each Other and Rules for Taboo. I recognize the limitations imposed by their very short length, and that they were probably not meant to be fully-fleshed characters to get invested in. But I found myself speeding through them because they felt like eating empty calories. In these pieces, the author seemed more interested in the format or premise than the story.
Cal Newport presents the idea of digital minimalism in a way that it's doable, pragmatic, and even as an act of resistance. Some parts fell flat for me (I didn't particularly see how Lincoln's history really illustrates the need for solitude), but the overall message of the book is useful. He gives several suggestion that can be readily implemented.
I recommend this to anyone who feels overstimulated by constant screen time, like me.
I was put off by the essay-ish explanations in between every section where something was actually happening to the protagonist. It felt so "tell", and not enough "show". I'm being told what to look at and what's happening, instead of me discovering it for myself.
This approach did not serve the format of fiction well. The frequency of these monologues took me out of the story every time I started getting into it.
Out of the 5 short stories in this book, I enjoyed 3 of them: The Red Ribbon, Reed & Dinnerstein Moving, and The Tunnel. Those stories had characters moving about their world in an interesting manner, and by the end, their situation has either changed or they have.
Jennette McCurdy's writing is simple and straightforward, bordering on sparse, which actually makes a better impact on the reader than explaining everything to us. She doesn't try to hammer a point home; she lets us sit in the feeling.
My favorite takeaway from this book is that intimacy must be intentional. It's not revolutionary advice, but she lays it out in a thoroughly convincing way that I started to think about how to intentionally nurture playfulness in a domestic relationship.
I also love her writing style: eloquent, direct, but still beautiful. She doesn't mince words but she doesn't come across as superior or preachy.
It's a well-structured book worth a read for anyone seeking insight on intimacy in long-term relationships.
It was fun to read about behind-the-scenes stories of a campaign.
The author did a passable job for a first-time book writer: his voice was consistent, the content was easy to digest, and the structure was straightforward.
It's a slower pace than I anticipated. The author does make good arguments, although the way they're laid out feels stilted and stuffy, for lack of a better word.