thevampiremars's reviews
205 reviews

Cynosure by Jessica Peng

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious fast-paced

3.5

I am cruel to this woman, for no real reason. Perhaps we both needed a goal.

At first I took this comic at face value, and I projected my own assumptions about how a story/conflict is supposed to play out. I thought it felt incomplete, lacking. But the ending recontextualised everything and gave me pause, so I reread the whole thing.
Two women torment each other just because – they’re both trapped in a shitty situation and don’t know what else to do. Instead of a typical violent climax where one triumphs over the other, they break the cycle and learn to forgive/be forgiven.
I still think it feels incomplete; more could have been done to build tension before that resolution. That said, I really appreciate what this comic does <3
A Three Body Problem by Tan Juan Gee

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful fast-paced

3.0

I like the artwork. The clean lines and blocks of blue give the comic a bit of a blueprint feel, which is apt for a sci-fi story featuring spaceships and cyborgs (maybe the author could have leant into this when
Io was depicted opened up and having their parts replaced
) It also fits the anticapitalist perspective (spotlighting how everything (and everyone) is viewed by capitalists as an asset to be exploited) ...Or maybe Tan just likes the colour blue?  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I wasn’t impressed by the story itself. I don’t think the comic does enough to drive home its political message. I know capitalism is exploitative but the text doesn’t demonstrate that – beyond the first page or two we don’t see Io working, so their line about “do[ing] all the work” falls flat. The murder mystery plotline was incredibly predictable too.
I dunno. I like the concept but in the end A Three Body Problem doesn’t quite hit the mark.
All Systems Red by Martha Wells

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced

4.0

Brisk; doesn’t outstay its welcome. The ~relatable~ sarcastic introvert thing doesn’t do a whole lot for me but I actually did find Murderbot endearing – vexed yet vulnerable is a good combination of traits to play with in your main character.

I had fun with it. I’m not rushing to read the rest of the series but if the mood strikes me I may revisit this socially awkward SecUnit at some point. 
Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

“Only a Radchaai would misgender people the way you do.”

I had high hopes for this book, having seen rave reviews and recommendations and the array of awards it won. I was disappointed.

It is not well written (“Her voice was slightly breathy, and I thought maybe she was hyperventilating slightly.”) The paper-thin plot is stretched to fill four hundred pages, with the resulting pacing issues not helped by backstory/exposition dumps. The slow then lurching narrative is unintentionally comedic (dare I say camp?) (the bridge scene, oh my god...) Overall it’s just not compelling which is a real shame because there are a few concepts which could have been intriguing had they been handled better.

I feel like I have to comment on the pronoun usage, which is probably the most talked-about aspect of this book. The POV character and narrator, Breq, refers to everyone with she/her pronouns. At first I assumed this was because she’s an AI and (despite not struggling with any other aspects of human speech and expression) she can’t wrap her head around the concept of gender. Defaulting to she/her made sense considering she is a ship AI specifically; ships are often referred to as she, so maybe Breq interprets she as a gender neutral pronoun. Neat. But it was later revealed that this universal she/her usage is not unique to AIs and is instead part of Radchaai culture (sort of) – they don’t use gendered pronouns in their language.
I had a look at Leckie’s website and in her FAQ she kind of dodges the question of why she chose to use she/her pronouns in this way. Yes, Radchaai language doesn’t use gendered pronouns, but why use she when “translating” the text to English instead of the actually gender neutral pronoun they? Maybe it’s supposed to be a feminist counter to generic he? I can’t assume that’s the intention behind it though because every explanation I’ve come up with so far has been proven false.
Here’s the thing: I’d heard that this book has some interesting things to say about gender, so I went in looking for that. I couldn’t find anything substantial and satisfying so I had to project my own interpretations onto what crumbs there were.

As I said at the start of this review, I set my expectations high. Maybe too high. Maybe I’m being unreasonable expecting Leckie’s debut novel to be something spectacular. But the accolades and the praise... I don’t know. It’s another instance of me reading a book, being totally underwhelmed, and left wondering what others see in it that I don’t. For me, Ancillary Justice doesn’t live up to the hype at all. 
Mercury Retrograde by Emily Segal

Go to review page

sad medium-paced

3.5

There’s a folkloristic idea of “common knowledge” that I sometimes think of when I try to remember what Marcus and I actually talked about when we discussed our projects. A lot of it was just pressured assent. Not exactly pressured by one another, more like pressured against an absent voice, the voice of the art world or perhaps the world-world, which we thought had the wrong ideas about cooperation, the wrong ideas about appropriation, the wrong ideas about authenticity, the wrong ideas about the lives of artists. At the same time we were still romantic about what we were doing. There was a quest-vibe to it. But there weren’t a lot of proper nouns.

At first, I thought my mental illness was considered a mark of belonging. I thought I was destigmatizing something by describing my new medication to any coworker who asked; now I’m not so sure. Maybe it was brave, weird, exhibitionist, socially suicidal, or all of the above. Maybe I just felt scared and alone, and thought that talking about it would make me feel less disconnected and better understood. I wanted the sustenance of friends looking on and knowing that I was imperfect and touched by the devils and angels of madness.

Our friendship was like stilts.
Any Other City by Hazel Jane Plante

Go to review page

emotional reflective medium-paced

3.0

Kind of soft and hard. Like pretty and angry. Like quiet and loud. You look confused, and that is perfect. It’s kind of like music for confused people.

Memoir or novel? It seems to be semi-autobiographical. Tracy is a self-insert (or maybe the opposite of a self-insert; a device to remove oneself from the narrative). The author avoids difficult introspection. She tries to be raw and honest but from a safe distance and with the defence of this being a work of fiction. Not that novels can’t be raw and honest, but this particular book has detachment baked in.
What makes this particularly frustrating is the spotlighting of art; artworks presented and deconstructed, songwriting demonstrated with the intention behind lyrics explained. It sets the reader up to analyse and interpret this novel. But I really don’t know what to make of it. Maybe that detachment I mentioned is entirely intentional on the author’s part; Tracy drifts aimlessly until she finds an inspiring grownup to imprint upon, she goes along with what they want, then there’s a timeskip and she’s out, she’s making music, she’s having lots of sex, but none of it feels real (maybe because she’s not real, she’s a fictional version of something real), and this could be a meta commentary on the nature of autobiography and storytelling more broadly, with direct comparison drawn with the dissociation that so many trans people experience as they reflect upon their lives and transitions, as well as the disruption brought on by trauma. Or maybe not. Was it the author’s intention to make me think about intention? Or am I trying to project meaning onto something that is ultimately shallow and only gesturing at depth and substance?

I really did want to like this book but every time I thought it might be doing something interesting, something annoying would happen (everyone clapped). I’ve been left with lots of questions that I don’t feel compelled to seek answers for. It is what it is.
The King in Yellow by Robert W. Chambers

Go to review page

dark funny mysterious medium-paced

3.0

I really liked the first short story in this collection, titled “The Repairer of Reputations”. It’s a surprising mix of sci-fi, fantasy, and weird fiction, with evocative imagery made dubious by the unreliable narrator. It’s infused with dark humour, and these tumbling contradictions and twisted truths make for some good political satire, for example the decriminalisation of suicide being seized upon by the government, warped from a declaration of bodily autonomy into a warrant to execute those deemed undesirable. I would gladly read a novella or novel following this story’s protagonist, Hildred, and his delusional perception of the world. Good prose.

Unfortunately, the rest of this book doesn’t meet the expectations set by that first story. There are a few fairly run-of-the-mill gothic tales; decent, but nothing spectacular. The last two or three stories abandon the supernatural elements altogether, instead detailing the romantic exploits of some American artists in Paris. I have to admit I skimmed those (they were quite boring). They feel very out of place and weaken the collection as a whole. 
The Three Electroknights by Stanisław Lem

Go to review page

funny inspiring reflective fast-paced

4.0

Sci-fi fairytales. Whimsical and absurd. Refreshing after being bogged down by Dune.
These stories were taken from a collection called Mortal Engines. I want to read that full collection at some point.
Heretics of Dune by Frank Herbert

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious slow-paced

2.5

‘You offer us slavery?’
‘That is one of your options.’

I struggled with this book. The narrative meanders a lot as various factions try to assert their influence. I found their scheming too abstract; it was unclear what any of these factions wanted or planned to do. Mysterious machinations are fine if anchored by compelling characters, ideally a single compelling protagonist who propels the plot forwards in such a way that the factions are forced to respond. Maybe that’s the point? Humanity is on the Golden Path but has no Tyrant to guide them now. Maybe the lack of momentum is a deliberate contrast to the narrative thrust implemented by Paul and Leto; their stories are over and this is the aftermath.
Authoritarian structures are collapsing, or at least being complicated. Where the adult-child dynamic was used to exemplify authoritarianism in the previous book, here we have a child commanding priests (and worms) as well as a millennia-old adult mind in an adolescent body.
There’s a gear shift in the final quarter and it becomes overtly sexual, I think because the balance of power is shifting in favour of women (again, the complicated gender politics of the Dune franchise; a matriarchy informed by patriarchal ideas of what women are capable of). A new form of manipulation replaces the action and violence we’d seen previously. That said,
Rakis does get blown up at the end.

Heretics of Dune was supposed to be the start of a new trilogy, but only the first two books were written before Frank Herbert’s death. I will read Chapterhouse Dune but I doubt I’ll read Brian Herbert’s contributions to the franchise (I hear they’re not great). Like many readers, I feel obligated to finish the main series of six novels due to the sunk cost fallacy if nothing else. The fandom consensus that each subsequent Dune novel is weaker than the last is holding true.
The Book of Queer Saints by Mae Murray

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced

3.0

I liked “The Love That Whirls” by Joe Koch and “Therianthrope” by Briar Ripley Page. I also enjoyed “Heliogabalus Fabulous” by Belle Tolls but that wasn’t a horror story in the slightest. Ironically it might be the collection’s best example of “Queer Saints” (as promised by the title of the book) – I had expected more religious/spiritual imagery. Christianity does inform this anthology, though; in the introduction the editor talks about being “a queer person who grew up in the repressive Bible Belt” which maybe explains why some of these stories felt a bit lacklustre to me personally – I don’t think vaguely sapphic witches are particularly shocking or revolutionary, but maybe they would be in Arkansas or whatever. idk... This book came out in 2022 but you wouldn’t know it.