3.71 AVERAGE


So I tried. I remained curious for a bit to the author’s pompous and pretentious pseudo intellectual musings. However, he stayed annoying and many of his comments I found misinformed and completely inaccurate. Particularly those about autism — particularly here, “They see others as inanimate objects, like machines, moved by explicit rules. They cannot perform such simple mental operations as "he knows that I don't know that I know," and it is this inability that impedes their social skills. (Interestingly, autistic subjects, regardless of their "intelligence," also exhibit an inability to comprehend uncertainty.” — this is simply untrue!

Probably the best book I've ever read. Taleb is the consummate erudite.
medium-paced

The Black Swan really changed the way I think about forecasting and uncertainty. As someone who’s been down the rabbit hole with probabilistic predictions, this book challenged a lot of the ideas I’ve found useful, especially compared to people like Philip Tetlock. Taleb’s core message is humbling: we usually know a lot less than we think, and the events that matter most are often the ones we can’t predict at all. While it gets dense in parts, Taleb’s style makes his arguments clear and direct. If you’re interested in exploring the boundaries of what we know—or think we know—I’d definitely recommend checking out The Black Swan.

Some incredibly important ideas ... from an author who's mighty full of himself, while bemoaning this quality in others.

Author is very full of himself to the point of being annoying. Very repetitive, could have been < 100 pages long and gotten the same message across. This was supposedly a classic...maybe I should have read it when it 1st came out.
informative reflective slow-paced

Taleb explains his ideas regarding 'Black Swans', highly unlikely and largely unforeseen random events that nevertheless have significant impact. Taleb maintains that Black Swans dominate the history of the human race but are largely ignored due to a combination of psychological biases and what he dismissively refers to as "Platonic" theories like the classical theory of statistics centered around the Gaussian distribution.

It's a lot to digest but NNT, as he styles himself, is a very entertaining and largely lucid writer. I would say he raises far more questions than he answers but the book is no worse for that and may be one of his central points -- we just don't know nearly as much as we think we do.

informative reflective medium-paced

the author is an pompous ass who loathes and mocks pompous asses. that aside, there are a some important observations about risk and misuse of models :- people overestimate what they know, and underestimate what they don't- people are prone to confirmation bias- many use models to forecast things leaving them fatally exposed to events which cannot be incorporated by their models. attempts at managing risk can result in greater exposure to risk in the long term- people misuse logic (would have been useful for readers if the author provided the formal names : inverse, converse and contrapositive)supposedly the author's earlier book, Fooled y andomness, is more to the point and less asinine.