Reviews

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3,000 by L. Ron Hubbard

maebinnig's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Whew. After an entire semester listening to this on my drive to and from school, the journey has finally come to a close. It’s the end of an era! (I also graduated, but finishing this book was the real accomplishment.)

Since I didn’t read a print version of Battlefield Earth, I’ve apparently been spelling everyone’s name wrong in my head. I’m sticking with my spelling in this review because my way is better.

Before I review the book overall, some notes on this recorded version: I was pretty impressed. The narrator is great, as are most of the voice actors and the sound effects. They salvage some unbearably cheesy scenes with the sheer emotion of their performances. When the narrative tells us that an explosion rocks the camp, we hear the sound of an explosion; when Johnny fiddles with a machine, we hear mechanical clinks and clanks. The music that plays quietly behind some scenes was also great for setting emotional tones.

My only complaint about this “movie of the mind” is the unfortunate “cinematic soundtrack”—not the music that sometimes plays quietly behind the narrative, but the thirty seconds of weird dissonant noise at the end of each track. Do yourself a favor and just skip to the next track when you start to hear it.

So, the book itself. Let me say this first: I didn't hate (most of) it. Parts of it had me sitting in my car in the parking lot because I couldn't go inside without finding out what happened next. The premise is fascinating, and Hubbard put a ton of work into (certain aspects of) this book. But, boy, does it have some very large issues--most of which boil down to authorial laziness.

1. The actual writing is bad. It's lazy and unpolished, full of passive voice and cliches. If I had turned in writing this bad for one of my classes this semester, my teacher would have ripped it apart.

2. The characters are all one thing. Johnny is All Hero. Chrissy is All Swooning Faithful Girlfriend. The Psychlos are All Evil.
(Yes, there's an explanation for that, but because all characters get the same one-dimensional treatment, that's no excuse.)
I felt sort of attached to them by the end of the story, but only because of familiarity bias (I had spent an entire semester listening to them, after all). He really couldn't have been any lazier with his character development, either. And along those lines...

3. The character depictions are terribly sexist and racist. I don't value political correctness for its own sake, but Battlefield Earth is sexist and racist to the point of dating the book badly and straining credulity. Historically, patriarchal roles tend to weaken after disasters; necessity demands that women step up and close the gaps. But in Hubbard's earth, women are helpless weaklings who WILL die if a man doesn't heroically save them.
When Johnny gets put in a cage, he plots and schemes to find his way out. When Chrissy and Patti get put in a cage, they all but die. When Earth's remnant humanity steps up to fight their enslavement, the men get to work learning languages, fixing machines, learning how to fly/drive/run machines, spying, mining, and building uranium detectors. The women? They make food for the men. Seriously.
This all culminates in the horrible ending that's supposed to be happy:
Johnny insists that his son learning a bunch of languages is not good enough; he also needs to be educated in the outdoors, to be able to catch and tame horses, to throw a kill club, to track and hunt and forage and tan. He's content, however, to let his daughter cook with her mother. KILL ME. (Oh yeah, and then he abandons his family forever, but it's cool because he needs his personal space.)


The racism chiefly comes into play
once the other Earth-tribes are discovered. The Asian characters don't stand up or sit down; they "bob up" and "bob down," constantly bow, wear long-sleeved robes, and beg for the privilege of serving Johnny forever. The Scottish characters wear plaid kilts and play the bagpipes (really! bagpipes survive the alien apocalypse!). The African brigantes rape, pillage, and cannibalize--they are literally more savage than the Psychlos. It's gross and, again, lazy. It would have been fascinating to see the different cultures that could have evolved over 1,000+ years, but instead of taking the time to create those, Hubbard just drew on present-day stereotypes.


4. The sci-fi parts of the novel are, more often than not, lazy and predictable. Again, there are some really interesting bits, and it's to Hubbard's credit that he sees them through. But there's plenty that just made me roll my eyes.
Can we just talk about the fact that the evil banking aliens who come to foreclose on Earth are described as physically resembling sharks? Come on.


My husband read the book along with me and enjoyed it. He likes Tom Clancy and light sci-fi--books that are much heavier on action than they are on character. If that's what you're looking for, you might quite enjoy Battlefield Earth--but then again, maybe not. It is really freaking long.

(I received this book for free through a Goodreads giveaway.)

jeffnichols's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

If I could give it zero stars I would. Don't bother.

pirate's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

It’s a solid legend, but the writing is horrible. Way too much plot. 

seano's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I read it because it was a >1000 page challenge over summer break. Looking back, it was pretty derivative.

micki's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I did not read this. I do not recommend anyone read this. Why review something I haven't read? Well, GR decided to send me an email this morning suggesting I read this garbage by the founder of a cult. I decided to write this instead.

So much GOOD science fiction out there (by people who didn't found cults). Read that stuff instead.

besw's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Supposedly the longest work of "pure" science fiction ever written, it contains interesting ideas and is a case study in how NOT to write your novel (from beginning to end without any idea where it's going and no retconning afterwards). If you're willing to lay aside the character drift and gaping plotholes, this is a good book with lots of action and intrigue. There's struggles for survival, air-to-ground combat, planet-eating "bombs," intergalactic industrial espionage, and space lawyers (who look like sharks).

matthewmurphy's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

So much pulp, but like really bad pulp.

ronpayne's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I read this back when I was in high school over 25 years ago before I knew anything about Scientology or L. Ron Hubbard besides those omnipresent Dianetics book commercials you'd see on off-hours basic cable back then. I remember thinking some parts of the book were tedious, but overall I thought it was great fun following along as humanity fought back against alien domination. Knowing what I know now, I definitely wouldn't re-read it, especially after having read parts of his Mission Earth series at a more mature point in my life, but I won't let that retroactively degrade my youthful impression of the book. So, if you're a dumb kid who just wants to read about people kicking some alien butt, I would definitely recommend this book to you.
More...