Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.71 AVERAGE
3.71 AVERAGE
So absolutely sad. I wish there was more said about how the parents neglect and oppression of the girls caused them to commit. but this was super unique
dark
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
dark
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
N/A
Diverse cast of characters:
N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
challenging
dark
reflective
slow-paced
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I was curious about the what life in the Lisbon household before any suicides was like, but like that that's never divulged. I like Eugenides' writing.
I oscillated on my rating for this novel quite a bit, mostly out of my changing ideas of what the author is trying to say. It is evident to me as a young woman that I cannot and should not have any sympathy for the collective that is narrating, but my conflict with them arises more for me in Eugenides’ depictions; in one breath they are heroes and collectors and in the other they are stuck so squarely in time in a moment where their obsessions prevent them from living their lives.
Regardless of Eugenides’ intentions, it’s clear that despite the “evidence” presented, our narrators are unreliable. The girls exist as a collective, an allegory for their own lives and loves, a blank canvas on which any member of the suburb could project. The male fantasy of being with the “perfect” woman colors so desperately the narrators’ perceptions of the girls that stains on sheets from sickness and neglect become “lemon” and “rose” colored, collarbones jutting out from a malnourished chest become holy curves of a mature body, and misplaced hypersexuality to cope with grief and abuse becomes “promiscuity” and “making love.” Lux is the only character with a personality in the Lisbon household with a personality because her weaponized sexuality is exactly what this collection of male onlookers want to see; a beautiful woman that fits their perspective of what a woman should use her looks for. Therese has one or two known interests that become the frame for every time we hear from her. Bonnie and Mary have no such luck.
Suicide does not have a point. It is not a metaphor. It is not a window to a broken home, nor is it the lantern blinking in the window for help. In this case, it is the accumulation of every person’s thoughtlessness and abuse at the cost of a human life. It is the key word here- human- that readers without a keen eye can miss in Eugenides’ narrators’ perceptions. By the end, it’s a little more clear, but the subtlety that surrounds this single-point perspective could easily get lost in the romantic prose of a small town stopped in a single moment.
Regardless of Eugenides’ intentions, it’s clear that despite the “evidence” presented, our narrators are unreliable. The girls exist as a collective, an allegory for their own lives and loves, a blank canvas on which any member of the suburb could project. The male fantasy of being with the “perfect” woman colors so desperately the narrators’ perceptions of the girls that stains on sheets from sickness and neglect become “lemon” and “rose” colored, collarbones jutting out from a malnourished chest become holy curves of a mature body, and misplaced hypersexuality to cope with grief and abuse becomes “promiscuity” and “making love.” Lux is the only character with a personality in the Lisbon household with a personality because her weaponized sexuality is exactly what this collection of male onlookers want to see; a beautiful woman that fits their perspective of what a woman should use her looks for. Therese has one or two known interests that become the frame for every time we hear from her. Bonnie and Mary have no such luck.
Suicide does not have a point. It is not a metaphor. It is not a window to a broken home, nor is it the lantern blinking in the window for help. In this case, it is the accumulation of every person’s thoughtlessness and abuse at the cost of a human life. It is the key word here- human- that readers without a keen eye can miss in Eugenides’ narrators’ perceptions. By the end, it’s a little more clear, but the subtlety that surrounds this single-point perspective could easily get lost in the romantic prose of a small town stopped in a single moment.
GUESS WHO FINISHED!!! After like five months... anywayyy
*ੈ✩‧₊˚
This book was good, I just went into such a bad reading slump during it and I think that kinda ruined my experience
QUOTEEE!!!
"In the end, the tortured tearing the Lisbon girls pointed to a simple reasoned refusal to accept the world as it was handed down to them, so full of flaws."
*ੈ✩‧₊˚
This book was good, I just went into such a bad reading slump during it and I think that kinda ruined my experience
QUOTEEE!!!
"In the end, the tortured tearing the Lisbon girls pointed to a simple reasoned refusal to accept the world as it was handed down to them, so full of flaws."
I think I kept waiting for a moment of self awareness from our narrator(s)(?) throughout the whole book. What’s supposed to be a tragedy that shook a family, and a whole town for that matter, to its core, is filled with weird and frankly sometimes disgusting sexual commentary about young underaged girls that ultimately killed themselves. There are many instances in which I felt compelled to stop reading because the narrator crossed some line, the book is well written and does keep a reader interested but it was just not made for me. Conspiring and delving into the deaths of five girls to give them meaning to you is disturbing and results in an interesting social critique at the cost of a reader’s peace of mind. I would not recommend this book to most people.