schmidtmark56's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

A boring transcript of a circlejerking echo chamber. The few times there was any dissent things completely broke down and their inability to deal with hetrodoxy within their own ranks was palpable. Dawkins made a good point about needing to read the bible to understand western literature and culture, but all the rest of it was simply rehearsing old cliches or talking past each other when they got too excited or when someone spoke in too nuanced a way.

rutajwaha's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Great interchange of ideas and viewpoints between Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens and Dennett, I wouldn't be a radical free thinker without these four. I enjoyed the discussion and really miss Christopher Hitchens.
For me the four horsemen of the apocalypse are stupidity, ignorance, denial and delusion.

msroark's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Ah, to hear Hitchens's "voice". I will look up the video now.
But I am glad to have these words to look back on.

brettcarl's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny hopeful informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

4.0

mariag's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective fast-paced

3.0

i think that there’s enough people who think this book is super important for me to say that i did want to shout at them every 10 pages for saying blanket statements that were just not in my opinion that well informed and so so western centric 
made me go uh no every page but still a lot of fascinating things to think about 

tayzza6966's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative lighthearted fast-paced

4.5

alisonwong_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

3.75

athos's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

4/5. Although there are points that I don't agree with (which is natural, of course) and there are some points I don't understand (as I haven't researched nowhere near as in-depth as the Four Horsemen), I found this book to be really important and interesting.

Above all, the atheism advocated by the Four Horsemen is one of reason and science. This is not about judging people based on their faith (as you can have a moral and immoral Muslim, a moral and immoral atheist, it is subjective to the individual), but it is about tackling belief based on blind unsupported faith, and encouraging individuals to assess the world based on evidence and reason. It is about challenging the harmful aspects of religion: terrorism, conversion camps, misinformation and indoctrination and discrimination based on the teachings in scripture, to name a few.

Everyone has a right to their beliefs, and one should not be judged solely because of their faith. One should be judged based on if they advocate harmful and prejudiced beliefs, pedal misinformation and if they use faith as an excuse (or justification) of punishment and totalitarianism (I recommend YouTuber Darkmatter2525's channel and series "Power Corrupts").

annaposch's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

jenmulsow's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Very good!