cillianc's review

Go to review page

1.0

DNF - too much religious rhetoric 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

scarroll178's review against another edition

Go to review page

This… seems like pseudoscience. The way Schwartz describes it, you can use IFS to label any “undesirable” parts of yourself as “other.” Your violent streak isn’t the “real you,” it’s one of your protectors. Donald Trump’s rampant xenophobia isn’t the “real him,” it’s a protector or a manager. I find Schwartz’s ideas naive at best and purposefully ignorant at worst. True, sometimes people act in violent or self-destructive ways because they’re trying to cope with trauma or protect themselves. However, this is not always the case, and pretending that it is ignores hundreds of years of evidence to the contrary. 

I feel for a lot of the people Schwartz had sessions with, and I don’t have anything against them. If Schwartz was able to help them, great. But it’s a hard pass for me. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katharina90's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

3.0

Read this book for therapy. I appreciate the concept at a high level and agree with many of the philosophical and theoretical aspects of IFS, but I have a hard time connecting with the practical side. In particular the transcribed therapy sessions did not resonate with me. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sierrascha's review

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

3.75

Richard Schwartz is a bit pretentious, but IFS is a really interesting theory that can be really helpful. A bit similar to narrative externalizing, this book offers a range of exercises that are great for self-help seekers and therapists. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...