You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
inspiring
lighthearted
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
funny
inspiring
reflective
I'm astounded at how good this book is. I seldom give 5 stars, but it's warranted.
I was exceedingly heartbroken and furious to the point of boiling for about 99.9% of the book, and it was perfect.
Read this, and get mad.
Read this, and make change!!
I was exceedingly heartbroken and furious to the point of boiling for about 99.9% of the book, and it was perfect.
Read this, and get mad.
Read this, and make change!!
emotional
funny
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
challenging
emotional
inspiring
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
emotional
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I am grateful that this book did not go the way of "it's the 60s and this feminist woman has a bad time" but the end which much too perfect for me to rate it higher than 3 stars
funny
inspiring
reflective
emotional
funny
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
I absolutely despised the first 50% and loved every word of the second. I simply cannot believe how stark the difference was. Every interaction between scientists in the first half: bad, smugly written, my head has been squished to pulp with the hammer of SEXISM BAD IN THE 50S. Every interaction between any other combo of people in the second: not that.
But the dog and the precocious child. Why. Why those things.
But the dog and the precocious child. Why. Why those things.