You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
17yo girl having more profound thoughts than a 30yo man
dark
emotional
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
First I’m going to start by saying that, I don’t know why, I’ve expected the writing style of this novel to be very minimalist and sober, and that I was pleasantly surprised by the more elaborated prose, which included some beautiful metaphors.
That been said, I think that this books suffers from the “80s and older sci-fi book” syndrome, aka it’s dated. In some aspects I can see why Fahrenheit 451 it’s considered a classic or cult novel. Some of the issues raised are scarily relevant even today, such as social interaction between humans in a world were machines acquire a huge importance, the obsession with certain forms of entertainment (that in this case reminded me of the social media of today) or the censorship and destruction of what can bother others based on the social criterion of their time. It’s the horrific side of this novel, how a man in 1966 could portrait our current society so well; but I guess that humanity moves in circles, even when things change a lot, at the core they don’t change that much. But let’s go back to what makes this novel dated in my opinion. For me they were the grandiose speeches appearing in casual conversation, the extremely impulsive and illogical actions of the main character and the jumpy narration in some parts. All of it made me think of a classic Hollywood movie, with all the overdone drama and affectation.
The best part of this novel, no doubt, it’s the premise of the novel itself. Firefighters turned into the ones that burn, destroying what can offend because it will make others think, to their comfort or discomfort. This is a novel to read, let rest in your mind and after that, reflect about.
The ending was explosive (pun intended), and in a way I think the perfect one for this novel. An open ending that lets the reader decide if this dystopia stays that way or turns into a utopia.
That been said, I think that this books suffers from the “80s and older sci-fi book” syndrome, aka it’s dated. In some aspects I can see why Fahrenheit 451 it’s considered a classic or cult novel. Some of the issues raised are scarily relevant even today, such as social interaction between humans in a world were machines acquire a huge importance, the obsession with certain forms of entertainment (that in this case reminded me of the social media of today) or the censorship and destruction of what can bother others based on the social criterion of their time. It’s the horrific side of this novel, how a man in 1966 could portrait our current society so well; but I guess that humanity moves in circles, even when things change a lot, at the core they don’t change that much. But let’s go back to what makes this novel dated in my opinion. For me they were the grandiose speeches appearing in casual conversation, the extremely impulsive and illogical actions of the main character and the jumpy narration in some parts. All of it made me think of a classic Hollywood movie, with all the overdone drama and affectation.
The best part of this novel, no doubt, it’s the premise of the novel itself. Firefighters turned into the ones that burn, destroying what can offend because it will make others think, to their comfort or discomfort. This is a novel to read, let rest in your mind and after that, reflect about.
The ending was explosive (pun intended), and in a way I think the perfect one for this novel. An open ending that lets the reader decide if this dystopia stays that way or turns into a utopia.
emotional
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
challenging
dark
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Het voelt niet goed om een klassieker een ster rating te geven, dus je zult merken dat deze ontbreekt aan mijn review.
Als je me een paar jaar terug had gezegd dat ik een klassieker zou oppakken uit vrije wil had ik je voor gek verklaard… but here we are.
De synopsis van Farenheit 451 heeft me altijd geïntrigeerd, dus ik vond het hoog tijd om het boek op te pakken. De lengte maakte het ook nog eens niet al te intimiderend (wat klassiekers in mijn ogen toch snel zijn).
En ik kan je vertellen dat ik de boodschap van dit boek heel goed vind, en daarmee ook helemaal snap dat dit tot de klassiekers behoort. Echter matcht de schrijfstijl van Ray Bradbury helaas totaal niet met mij en raakte ik soms zelfs haast overprikkeld door zijn manier van schrijven.
Of dit ligt aan hoe oud het boek is, of puur een stylistische keuze is geweest van de auteur weet ik niet, maar voor mij verminderde het helaas mijn leeservaring.
Als je me een paar jaar terug had gezegd dat ik een klassieker zou oppakken uit vrije wil had ik je voor gek verklaard… but here we are.
De synopsis van Farenheit 451 heeft me altijd geïntrigeerd, dus ik vond het hoog tijd om het boek op te pakken. De lengte maakte het ook nog eens niet al te intimiderend (wat klassiekers in mijn ogen toch snel zijn).
En ik kan je vertellen dat ik de boodschap van dit boek heel goed vind, en daarmee ook helemaal snap dat dit tot de klassiekers behoort. Echter matcht de schrijfstijl van Ray Bradbury helaas totaal niet met mij en raakte ik soms zelfs haast overprikkeld door zijn manier van schrijven.
Of dit ligt aan hoe oud het boek is, of puur een stylistische keuze is geweest van de auteur weet ik niet, maar voor mij verminderde het helaas mijn leeservaring.
dark
reflective
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
oh okay so we are like almost here! cool. genuinely great book with a great dystopia, i tried to read this in like middle school and got about three pages in before declaring it boring and stupid but what the hell did i know??? this is amazing some of the last lines about mildred just stopped me in my tracks
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes