Scan barcode
rebuiltbybooks's review
informative
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
seigele93's review
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
3.5
rhiannagrime's review
challenging
informative
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
samstillreading's review
4.0
Thank you to Bloomsbury and The Reading Room for the copy of this book.
I’ve been fascinated by the story of Los Alamos ever since I saw a documentary on the men that worked there during World War II. (I didn’t even think about their wives, girlfriends or daughters – how narrow minded of me!) When I saw The Wives of Los Alamos, I knew this was a book I wanted to read for the perspective of what it was like to live, not just work on a top secret mission. I thought this was a non-fiction book, but it’s actually a novel that has been really well researched and tells the story of the women stationed there, no part of their lives left uncovered.
Los Alamos was the secret place in New Mexico, USA where scientists were recruited to work on a top secret mission for the government during World War II. Men and their families came from all parts of the US and further afield, such as Europe. For the wives, it was a complete upheaval. They had to leave their jobs (some were well respected academics in their own field) and their families, but couldn’t say where they were going. Heck, they didn’t even know where they were going. They were given new names. Their future address was nothing but a postal box. To get to their new home, they had to cross the country and then ask for directions in a shop. Once they arrived in Los Alamos, they needed passes to leave. They simply had no idea where they were going and what the essence was of all this secrecy. Their husbands were smart men, good men. So why didn’t they know what their new house would be like? The children’s school?
Nesbit captures all these worries and the adjustments the wives of Los Alamos had to make. I found it fascinating how there is no one main character, but the story is told from the collective first person of all the wives of Los Alamos. I imagine that this was not an easy thing to do, as the women were so different – from newlyweds to older wives, no children to many. They came from varying educational and cultural backgrounds, but they all had to make a living for their families in huts without bathrooms, stores that held very little and in complete isolation from their families and friends. It was no wonder that such strong bonds were formed between these women as they made the best out of what little they had. Nesbit’s writing captures this beautifully – the sense of a community thrown together that becomes very close out of shared need.
I did find it took me a little while to get used to the ‘we’ (the wives) of the narrative, but once I hit my stride, I was eager to read more. Even though I knew what the Project was, I was just as shocked as the wives when they found out what their husbands had been up to. Nesbit captured all the differing feelings so well – from shock and horror to jubilation at their role in ending the war. (From visiting Hiroshima and the Peace Museum, I was familiar with the effects of the bomb on the Japanese, but I hadn’t deeply considered the reaction of those who had invented the bomb. It was an eerie, uncomfortable feeling to know the feelings of both sides). Was the use of ‘we’ as the character in the novel to show the bomb was a team effort, or that the responsibility for the outcome could not be laid at the feet of one individual? Was it simply to show the coming together of individuals in the war? Or, to show that women are at heart the same?
If you’re looking for a story about particular named characters, you may not enjoy this book. But if you’re looking for an overall story of the lives of the women in Los Alamos (a place that didn’t really exist to the rest of the world in WWII), written in a unique voice, you’ll love it.
http://samstillreading.wordpress.com
I’ve been fascinated by the story of Los Alamos ever since I saw a documentary on the men that worked there during World War II. (I didn’t even think about their wives, girlfriends or daughters – how narrow minded of me!) When I saw The Wives of Los Alamos, I knew this was a book I wanted to read for the perspective of what it was like to live, not just work on a top secret mission. I thought this was a non-fiction book, but it’s actually a novel that has been really well researched and tells the story of the women stationed there, no part of their lives left uncovered.
Los Alamos was the secret place in New Mexico, USA where scientists were recruited to work on a top secret mission for the government during World War II. Men and their families came from all parts of the US and further afield, such as Europe. For the wives, it was a complete upheaval. They had to leave their jobs (some were well respected academics in their own field) and their families, but couldn’t say where they were going. Heck, they didn’t even know where they were going. They were given new names. Their future address was nothing but a postal box. To get to their new home, they had to cross the country and then ask for directions in a shop. Once they arrived in Los Alamos, they needed passes to leave. They simply had no idea where they were going and what the essence was of all this secrecy. Their husbands were smart men, good men. So why didn’t they know what their new house would be like? The children’s school?
Nesbit captures all these worries and the adjustments the wives of Los Alamos had to make. I found it fascinating how there is no one main character, but the story is told from the collective first person of all the wives of Los Alamos. I imagine that this was not an easy thing to do, as the women were so different – from newlyweds to older wives, no children to many. They came from varying educational and cultural backgrounds, but they all had to make a living for their families in huts without bathrooms, stores that held very little and in complete isolation from their families and friends. It was no wonder that such strong bonds were formed between these women as they made the best out of what little they had. Nesbit’s writing captures this beautifully – the sense of a community thrown together that becomes very close out of shared need.
I did find it took me a little while to get used to the ‘we’ (the wives) of the narrative, but once I hit my stride, I was eager to read more. Even though I knew what the Project was, I was just as shocked as the wives when they found out what their husbands had been up to. Nesbit captured all the differing feelings so well – from shock and horror to jubilation at their role in ending the war. (From visiting Hiroshima and the Peace Museum, I was familiar with the effects of the bomb on the Japanese, but I hadn’t deeply considered the reaction of those who had invented the bomb. It was an eerie, uncomfortable feeling to know the feelings of both sides). Was the use of ‘we’ as the character in the novel to show the bomb was a team effort, or that the responsibility for the outcome could not be laid at the feet of one individual? Was it simply to show the coming together of individuals in the war? Or, to show that women are at heart the same?
If you’re looking for a story about particular named characters, you may not enjoy this book. But if you’re looking for an overall story of the lives of the women in Los Alamos (a place that didn’t really exist to the rest of the world in WWII), written in a unique voice, you’ll love it.
http://samstillreading.wordpress.com
cmocker's review
3.0
I too, like most reviewers, grew tired of the first person plural narrator. However, the book was enticing enough to make me want to continue reading, while independently reading about Los Alamos and its history. My husband was a nuclear engineer and has been to Los Alamos, so I've already been curious about it.
Some parts of the story were unbelievable to hear: how couples couldn't tell their families where they were, how their children away at college couldn't come visit, how the director of Los Alamos was a peer of Rutherford and Thompson and other pioneers that I've learned about in Chemistry class.
I feel badly that people didn't seem to know how to deal with these scientists afterwards. Whether you agree with the discovery of the atomic bomb or not, I truly believe these scientists were patriots who loved science and loved their country and hoped they were doing the right thing. This is really a part of history that many people don't seem to know much about.
Some parts of the story were unbelievable to hear: how couples couldn't tell their families where they were, how their children away at college couldn't come visit, how the director of Los Alamos was a peer of Rutherford and Thompson and other pioneers that I've learned about in Chemistry class.
I feel badly that people didn't seem to know how to deal with these scientists afterwards. Whether you agree with the discovery of the atomic bomb or not, I truly believe these scientists were patriots who loved science and loved their country and hoped they were doing the right thing. This is really a part of history that many people don't seem to know much about.
wildflower37's review
3.0
I was intrigued to read this book as I had visited Los Alamos and the museum told a story of a town that pulled together, created a unique society, and contributed to American History. This book did not discredit that museum storyline, but deepened it and showed a little bit more of the challenges and the concerns of the wives and eventually the husbands involved in building The Gadget.
I was also intrigued by the use of the "we" voice. It originally drew me in, showed me the similarities and differences in the wives. But over the course of the book I found it feeling more like an ethnography than a novel; I couldn't get close enough to the characters. A good read, but different.
I was also intrigued by the use of the "we" voice. It originally drew me in, showed me the similarities and differences in the wives. But over the course of the book I found it feeling more like an ethnography than a novel; I couldn't get close enough to the characters. A good read, but different.
terragoes's review
3.0
I really enjoyed the topic of this book. It provides an interesting look at the lives of women married to the scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos during WWII. While I know the basics of how and where the atomic bomb was developed, I had never considered what life might have been like for the women who joined their husbands in New Mexico. It was neat to read about these women packing up their lives and moving to an unknown location for unknown amount of time, all because that's what their nation and their husbands asked of them.
All that said, while I really did enjoy the topic, the first person plural was less fun. I spent the first 25 pages thinking eventually it would switch to a more personal story, but it never did. That first person plural sticks around for the entirety of the book. It made it difficult to feel any sort of connection with the women, and instead it felt more like a vague overview of something that happened to someone.
All that said, while I really did enjoy the topic, the first person plural was less fun. I spent the first 25 pages thinking eventually it would switch to a more personal story, but it never did. That first person plural sticks around for the entirety of the book. It made it difficult to feel any sort of connection with the women, and instead it felt more like a vague overview of something that happened to someone.
rinda's review
2.0
Did not care for her writing style. Each chapter was a topic she wrote about in the plural from as antidotes about the topic. I prefer a storyline plot rather than topical as it felt disjointed and shortstoryish. The girls of atomic city not by her but similar topic was much better. She just didn’t really seem to say much or develop any deep thought in what is a fascinating time especially for women.
danabrown's review
5.0
Excellent. It's about the unique experience of Los Alamos but it's also about young women - women's roles in marriage, family, and community. A very worthwhile and enjoyable read.