hannahlois's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

ameliez's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional inspiring tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

lillianareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

punisher's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.75

pvnmeh's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

spacestationtrustfund's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Sarah Ruden!!!

platosfire's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

rpmiller's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

These 16 plays constitute half of the surviving dram manuscripts from ancient Greece. All were from the 5th century BCE. No other complete plays are in existence beyond these 32, while the Iliad and Odyssey are much earlier, although perhaps not in original form, and later Greek literature did not survive except as fragmentary texts. Much is known, still, from reference in later texts, mostly Roman. Anyway, this was an excellent selection that included introductory material regarding the author and each play. Three authors are represented here and the plays of Aeschylus include a complete trilogy which is how the tragedies were performed in the Athens theater in an annual competition, at least at that time, the competition also included a short comedy from each author, as a kind of interlude between competitors. The book has extensive notes on translations, missing and replacement text, and background details, as well as six appendixes to help a modern reader understand the plays in the way ancient Athenians did.

I should point out that I have read Homer's works many times, and a few of the plays years ago, and various literary an video adaptions over the years and recently read a very contemporary novel "Elektra". In comparison, each of the playwrights had a play called Elektra or, for Aeschylus, a trilogy about the same subject, although the three plays were all based on Orestes, Elektra's younger brother. The novel probably had a similar scope to Aeschylus' trilogy, while the detail on Elektra corresponded more closely with Euripides' version. An interesting aspect, for me, was how there were variations in detail among the Greeks. Another example of variation was Euripides' "Helen" which presents an alternative history of Hellen's adventure. Finally, in "Bacchae", Euripides seems to have had a premonition of the 1960's "tune in, turn on and drop out" cultural phenomena.

It is well worth the effort to read and understand these important examples of ancient literature.

archytas's review

Go to review page

5.0

Many people have that thing you studied in high school that just clicked, that opened worlds and brought passion. For me, that was Greek drama. Something about the intensity, the poetry, the surprise that humanity could be so recognisable over millennia - that a poet living so long ago on the other side of the world could see into me. Fast forward a few decades, I finally travel to Athens, and to prep go looking for this love of my youth. I landed on this volume because of the emphasis on accuracy, context and the use of Greek words. I majored in Greek at uni, meaning I had read all of the plays in volume before, in original or translation, sand connecting to the Greek was important. I also re-read Thucydides, an unexpectedly tedious experience - so entered the book with the fear that the magic had gone.
I shouldn't have worried. From the opening lines of Aeschylus' Persians, I was hooked. These plays demand your attention. There is no need to elucidate meanings through stilted prose - characters lay their emotions out in articulate, raw, boastful verse that speaks straight to your own emotions. There is complexity for the reader/viewer aplenty, which comes from trying to sort through what it all means - who is right and who is not, and how can everyone be right when they are trenchantly opposed? The Gods appear onstage at times, but are often most powerful when absent: forces to which humans surrender, fight or adapt to (The Bacchae, in which Dionysus is remarkably human, is an exception not rule). This ensures a delicate balance of agency and inevitability, where serves somehow to place more emphasis, not less, on that agency.
It is a treasure to have so many plays in a single volume, all with decent translations. I took it to Greece with me, read Hippolytus as the plane descended, sat in the Theatre of Dionysus and read Medea's main monologue in the heat, returning to consume Oedipus at Colonus in a cooler early evening. I dipped into Eumenides while watching over Aeropagus Hill, and ran through Antigone tucked up in bed. My beloved Bacchae I left until last when I was home and processing. To adolescent me, the Bacchae was the greatest literary work ever. I read it over and over. I remember trying to explain how real the intensity of emotion, the tragedy, the stupid arrogance felt. As I got older, its glory faded, replaced by an appreciation for the shading of Antigone and the rest of Sophocles' Oresteia, of Prometheus Bound, and in Euripides work, the strong anti-war message of Trojan Women* and the possible feminist readings of Medea and Alcestis. To my pleased surprise, I rediscovered an appreciation for the Bacchae, without the same identification with emotion, but recognising the greatness of the structure, the mingling of ecstasy, despair, grandeur, pettiness, awe and the crash to reality. Sure Euripides is not subtle in his messaging, but he paints in a flurry of colours with detail that can be obscured if you don't take your time with it.
The extra detail here is mostly excellent. The short essays at the end cover key topics succinctly - and if you are thinking of taking this to Greece, the performance details help the imagining-how-theatres-actually-looked thing. But the footnotes - well - many of the footnotes are excellent, especially those relating to translation issues and meter. But many are just irritating, repeating definitions already given or just explaining very basic mythology (which was often clear from context in any case). If these had been distinguished between, it would have solved the problem, but I found myself continuously yanked out of the text uselessly, eventually being forced to choose between losing the interesting textual info or severely disrupted reading.
On the whole, however, I would highly recommend this volume to Greek drama newbies and oldies alike.

*One advantage at least of having just reread Thucydides was that I had the timeline of the Peloponnesian War fresh, and could appreciate the timing of the plays - and their undoubted critique of Athenia war atrocities -  better.
More...