arijones91's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective medium-paced

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

albon's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

niamhreadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective fast-paced

4.75

A really hard read in terms of the content, but the writing style makes it very 'readable.' This is a thoroughly researched book which documents the Missoula rape crisis that left women and girls vulnerable to the unwanted advances of college and football students. Krakauer is not afraid to call out blatant lies and misleading information throughout this book when it was clear that police and state officials were lying or misrepresenting facts. He was consistently on the side of the victims while also providing interesting - but harrowing- interview transcripts from the rapists at the heart of some of the accusations. While vile to read, they provide an interesting insight into how these acquaintance rapes are thought of by those who commit them (hint: they don't think of them as rape in the slightest, despite their own disgusting tellings of some incidents). Well worth a read, if you can stomach it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gracerowland's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sonygaystation's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

beautifuljames's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

qsick's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cateyackerman's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

devanyb21's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

floratristan's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative sad tense fast-paced

4.25

Extremely depressing, infuriating and frustrating read. At some point it's just hard not to scream, it seems like any man, even your close childhood friend, could be a potential threat and rape you. And no matter how much evidence you gather, how obvious your case is, there are a multitude of hurdles: the slim chance of the police taking you seriously, then of the DA accepting to prosecute your case, then of the case verdict being "guilty". And even if all this happens, there are still extremely mild sentences and many options to appeal. 
I find it interesting that colleges in the US have a kind of legal system. I wonder if that's the case for any European universities (not as far as I know) and why that is. Is it because expulsion is only possible once a criminal investigation happens? Reminded me of the UdK case. 
I also find it interesting that there are different levels of how much proof you need, even in court between criminal and civil cases. Beyond a reasonable doubt or just through the sheer multitude of evidence. 
Lastly, I think it's important to know statistics in order to talk about the subject in an informed way: over 90% of accusations of rape are true, and most rapists are serial rapists. What makes me especially angry is when female friends or people like Kristin Pabst betray victims of rape. I just don't get it! I empathie so much with the women telling their stories, with the feelings they describe even if their reactions don't make sense in a rational way, about the trauma afterward, etc. So how someone like Pabst can turn off her empathy or forget what it's like to be a woman in a misogynistic society is beyond me. 
4,5 stars because I found it a little bit strange that in the beginning, Huguets story was partly told from the perspective of her father and how hard it was for him to face his daughters rape. I get that Krakauer is a middle aged man who probably empathises with the father's position the most, but especially at the beginng of the book this perspective should not have so much weight, because it promotes the idea of paternalistic, macho, "my daughter's innocence and purity are virtues that I as a father need to protect vehemently more than other qualities she might have" narrative

Expand filter menu Content Warnings