Scan barcode
sadhamster's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault
Moderate: Toxic relationship and Domestic abuse
Minor: Sexism and Vomit
fionamclary's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
hopeful
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Well, I'm sad to say that the quest for a truly excellent sapphic academia continues. Although I liked this a good deal better than the last sapphic dark academia I read, I still found some things lacking.
Like many readers, I had a hard time seeing how all four perspectives fit together. Often it felt like I was reading two to three different books. I think if all four characters had personal connections to each other, it would have worked much better. As it was, basically the only character that Louisa had any relation to was Karina. This made the different perspectives feel additionally disjointed. However, all characters went through satisfying development, whether for better or for worse. Preston, falling into the latter category, ended up being an interesting vehicle for exploring the intersection of art, capitalism, and the 2010s internet through a lens that captured both the 2011-2012 setting of the book and the hindsight that the author has 10 years later.
Speaking of the early 2010s...a small thing that bothered the heck out of me was the timeline of Preston's Tumblr. The book says that he started it shortly after his mother's death, which happened when he was 14. This would have been 7-8 years before the events of the book. Tumblr was launched in 2007, 4-5 years before the events of the book. I was surprised that a Millennial author would get this detail wrong—and she could have resolved it by saying that he started on another platform and then migrated to Tumblr, but no, it explicitly says that he started his Tumblr soon after his mom died. This bugged me way too much but I don't think it's an unreasonable thing to get right. Am I crazy??
I read this book in April 2024, as I'm watching encampments protesting the genocide in Gaza go up on university campuses across the country, so the Occupy setting of this book felt especially timely. I might recommend this book to anyone looking for parallels in their reading life to current events.
Anyway, I think this would be a solid read for the art girlies looking for something meditative and gay. Just don't expect it to be The queer academia of all time.
Like many readers, I had a hard time seeing how all four perspectives fit together. Often it felt like I was reading two to three different books. I think if all four characters had personal connections to each other, it would have worked much better. As it was, basically the only character that Louisa had any relation to was Karina. This made the different perspectives feel additionally disjointed. However, all characters went through satisfying development, whether for better or for worse. Preston, falling into the latter category, ended up being an interesting vehicle for exploring the intersection of art, capitalism, and the 2010s internet through a lens that captured both the 2011-2012 setting of the book and the hindsight that the author has 10 years later.
Speaking of the early 2010s...a small thing that bothered the heck out of me was the timeline of Preston's Tumblr. The book says that he started it shortly after his mother's death, which happened when he was 14. This would have been 7-8 years before the events of the book. Tumblr was launched in 2007, 4-5 years before the events of the book. I was surprised that a Millennial author would get this detail wrong—and she could have resolved it by saying that he started on another platform and then migrated to Tumblr, but no, it explicitly says that he started his Tumblr soon after his mom died. This bugged me way too much but I don't think it's an unreasonable thing to get right. Am I crazy??
I read this book in April 2024, as I'm watching encampments protesting the genocide in Gaza go up on university campuses across the country, so the Occupy setting of this book felt especially timely. I might recommend this book to anyone looking for parallels in their reading life to current events.
Anyway, I think this would be a solid read for the art girlies looking for something meditative and gay. Just don't expect it to be The queer academia of all time.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Infidelity, Drug use, Classism, Alcohol, and Domestic abuse
Moderate: Sexual assault, Sexual content, Cursing, Mental illness, Terminal illness, Suicide, Death, Dementia, and Suicidal thoughts
Minor: Lesbophobia, Bullying, Police brutality, Grief, and Homophobia
hannahleewhite's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
tense
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Content Warnings
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Sexual assault
Minor: Dementia, Mental illness, Drug use, and Suicide
noahbenoit's review against another edition
dark
emotional
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
beautifully written, but i'm getting tired of all queer books having the same kind of vibe and narrative (broken unreliable cold modern characters have toxic relationships together and dread on life), this is for sure playing that trope with very little plot! i feel like this masterful prose + fertile context could have given way more
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape
Moderate: Suicide and Domestic abuse
emilycmarshman's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
This book was so, so good. I sat down to read it the day after I bought it and read 100 pages in a single sitting, and then found myself doing what I always seem to do when I'm enjoying a book: put off finishing it, because I can't stand the thought of it being over.
In the late 2000s, Louisa, a young artist from the deep south, is admitted to Wrynn College of Art in New England, and struggles to prove herself among her elite, mostly rich classmates. She finds herself drawn to her originally removed roommate Karina, and the two begin a torrid, emotional love affair. The story follows the two of them, in addition to Preston Utley, a boy in their class at Wrynn that Karina dates at the same time she's becoming involved with Louisa, and Robert Berger, a painter-turned-adjunct-professor at Wrynn who's battling his own internal conflicts surrounding his place in the art world, over the course of less than a year of their lives.
The reason I'm giving this book four stars instead of five is because I do think the pacing felt a little off. The beginning of the story seemed to stretch on, and the end rushed by very quickly. I also feel as though the inclusion of Preston's POV was only for us to learn information requisite to the plot - he was a compelling character, and I realize his involvement in the lives of the other three protagonists was vital, but I don't think an entire POV was necessary. On the other hand, I felt extremely emotionally connected to Robert, Louisa, and Karina's stories. Louisa really struggled with having to leave behind her family, whom she's very close with (not to mention her grandfather is very sick), in order to pursue her dreams of attending Wrynn, which I can relate to very closely.
Antonia Angress did an incredible job of making each of these characters feel like real, tangible people, and by the end of Sirens & Muses, I wanted nothing more than for each of them to find happiness.
In the late 2000s, Louisa, a young artist from the deep south, is admitted to Wrynn College of Art in New England, and struggles to prove herself among her elite, mostly rich classmates. She finds herself drawn to her originally removed roommate Karina, and the two begin a torrid, emotional love affair. The story follows the two of them, in addition to Preston Utley, a boy in their class at Wrynn that Karina dates at the same time she's becoming involved with Louisa, and Robert Berger, a painter-turned-adjunct-professor at Wrynn who's battling his own internal conflicts surrounding his place in the art world, over the course of less than a year of their lives.
The reason I'm giving this book four stars instead of five is because I do think the pacing felt a little off. The beginning of the story seemed to stretch on, and the end rushed by very quickly. I also feel as though the inclusion of Preston's POV was only for us to learn information requisite to the plot - he was a compelling character, and I realize his involvement in the lives of the other three protagonists was vital, but I don't think an entire POV was necessary. On the other hand, I felt extremely emotionally connected to Robert, Louisa, and Karina's stories. Louisa really struggled with having to leave behind her family, whom she's very close with (not to mention her grandfather is very sick), in order to pursue her dreams of attending Wrynn, which I can relate to very closely.
Antonia Angress did an incredible job of making each of these characters feel like real, tangible people, and by the end of Sirens & Muses, I wanted nothing more than for each of them to find happiness.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Domestic abuse and Alcoholism
Moderate: Sexual assault, Emotional abuse, and Physical abuse
elisammansur's review against another edition
relaxing
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Death, and Sexual assault
calicot's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
3.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Physical abuse
Minor: Rape
sophiamcd's review against another edition
hopeful
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault, Domestic abuse, and Suicide
_jennaalbright_'s review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
inspiring
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
A beautiful novel that explores how, despite someone’s wrongdoings or faults, there is still a person inside who is deserving of love and a second chance at life. The art world was, in my opinion, excellently explored at a level that was digestible to someone who is not well-versed in that field. The characters are raw, tangible, and sometimes absolutely infuriating, but you cannot help but flip the page, eager to know where their lives will lead. No one character is the same, and I found myself equally invested in different aspects of each character's life. A new favorite on my shelf that did everything I want out of a literary fiction novel.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Domestic abuse, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Classism, Suicidal thoughts, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Grief, Sexual assault, and Drug use
1414's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Sexual assault, Domestic abuse, Terminal illness, Suicidal thoughts, and Death
Minor: Child abuse and Rape