You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

adventurous funny tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes

I don’t know. I never knew what was going on. Maybe there’s meaning in that. Maybe there isn’t. Maybe I’m just stupid.

I can see why the book was ground breaking and is so well revered. It was just hard for me to get traction in either understanding or caring about what was going on.

I’m sure I’ll revisit at some point and my views might drastically change by then.

3.5
adventurous challenging mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
adventurous dark tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix

1,5 Sterne für die Originalität der Idee für seine Zeit. Ansonsten finde ich das Buch sehr schlecht geschrieben. Die Erzählung fühlt sich nicht flüssig an und mir fiel es schwer ihr zu folgen. Würde es Niemandem weiterempfehlen.
adventurous challenging dark fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: N/A
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Ummm.... Look, old school sci fi is a tricky thing. Some of it ages well, some doesn't. Some of it resonates. Some of it doesn't. 

Neuromancer was absolutely ahead of it's time, and it's got some really interesting things to say. But I'm not really feeling it. It was good enough to finish (I got no issue with a DNF), but not enough that I'm going back for book two. 

If you're on the fence, read the first couple chapters. If you aren't hooked early on, you're not going to enjoy it any more by the end. 
adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous dark fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

William Gibson is very clearly very talented.  His writing is sharp, his ability to describe the world he creates brings it to life.  He is very prescient, even coining the term cyberspace.

However, as with a lot the cyberpunk genre that this novel spawned, I don’t find it to be particularly my thing.  The world is dark.  His characters extremely flawed and mostly unlikable.  The best character in the whole novel may be a virtual copy of a dead man.