Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.97 AVERAGE
3.97 AVERAGE
Absolut excepțională. Am citit destule SF-uri, fantasy-uri, și steam-punk-uri, dar niciodată un melanj atât de fluid între ele nu mi-a fost dat să văd. Nu degeaba e Mieville considerat probabil cel mai bun autor de SF/fantasy al ultimilor 20 de ani.
Cartea asta e de o inventivitate interminabilă, plină de personaje unul mai memorabil ca altul (și sunt cu zecile), o intrigă care schimbă macazul după prima treime și un final pe trei nivele care îți zboară creierii. Gândiți-vă la un miez a la Tolkien, cu un mix de Michael Ende (în Neverending Story) și cu mizerabilismul post-uman al lui William Gibson (din primele două trilogii), și apoi puțin existențialism dostoievskian presărat peste tot. Totul se leagă atât de bine, lumea creată e foarte densă și are dubios de multă logică, cu aerul că totul e descoperit și nu inventat, și niciodată nu pare că se ridică în aer spre locurile alea insipide în care se duc să moară destule povești mult mai puțin credibile.
Singura chestie pe care voiam să i-o reproșez cărții e lungimea. Dar după final, m-am răzgândit. E perfectă.
Abia aștept să citesc The Scar, despre care lumea zice că e chiar mai bună decât asta.
P.S. Dacă Perdido era o carte de debut (nu e, a mai scris DOAR una înainte de asta) mă întorceam la toate celelalte cărți de debut citite și le scurtam ratingurile de câte o stea. ATÂT mi s-a părut de bună.
Cartea asta e de o inventivitate interminabilă, plină de personaje unul mai memorabil ca altul (și sunt cu zecile), o intrigă care schimbă macazul după prima treime și un final pe trei nivele care îți zboară creierii. Gândiți-vă la un miez a la Tolkien, cu un mix de Michael Ende (în Neverending Story) și cu mizerabilismul post-uman al lui William Gibson (din primele două trilogii), și apoi puțin existențialism dostoievskian presărat peste tot. Totul se leagă atât de bine, lumea creată e foarte densă și are dubios de multă logică, cu aerul că totul e descoperit și nu inventat, și niciodată nu pare că se ridică în aer spre locurile alea insipide în care se duc să moară destule povești mult mai puțin credibile.
Singura chestie pe care voiam să i-o reproșez cărții e lungimea. Dar după final, m-am răzgândit. E perfectă.
Abia aștept să citesc The Scar, despre care lumea zice că e chiar mai bună decât asta.
P.S. Dacă Perdido era o carte de debut (nu e, a mai scris DOAR una înainte de asta) mă întorceam la toate celelalte cărți de debut citite și le scurtam ratingurile de câte o stea. ATÂT mi s-a părut de bună.
I really wish I could give this book more stars. The author clearly loves it so much, and thinks everything in it is so great, that I feel almost guilty disagreeing. But that's the whole problem with it! You have to be willing to kill your darlings if they clutter the grander arc of the story. And this book is jam-packed with darlings he couldn't see his way to pruning. An embarrassment of darlings. There's too many cute ideas for the best characters and most interesting aspects of the plot to get developed as much as they deserve. (There will be spoilers in the following.)
My major problem, and this is initially going to sound kind of crazy, is that there's no antagonist. Clearly there's bad guys, we have literal demons menacing the city? Foul thought-vampires bent on destruction!
But they are not compelling to me at all, and it took some soul-searching to come to why. They're not interesting because the slake-moths are the fantasy equivalent of malarial mosquitoes. Their grand endgame is to eat a bunch and then breed. There can't be meaningful opposition if one side of the struggle isn't even sentient. It'd be like if the first 70% of Return of the Jedi were about Luke tracking down and finishing off the wendigo that roughed him up early on. If the solution to your dramatic tension is literally constructing a giant bug-zapper then the conflict can fundamentally not be emotionally compelling.
The 70% thing is the other painful part. There's this sinking feeling associated with reading poorly-paced novels, where it's dragged on and on getting to the confrontation with the main villain, and then you can look forward and see you've got another 100 pages to go. You just know the denouement is going to be painful and/or nonsensical, but at this point you're pretty well stuck, sunk costs.
Here's 7 stupid things that should've been cut:
1. sentient steam-punk robots
2. frog-people
3. hand-people
4. cactus-people
5. rare-beast-hunting mercenaries
6. chimeric crime-bosses
7. the newspaper woman
You're allowed maybe one crazy fantastic innovation every 200 pages. The Weaver, Lin (and associated bug-people), and the slake-moths are allowed to stay. All other darlings must die. Now the story is essentially that Isaac accidentally releases the moths, Lin helps him (instead of the newspaper woman), the moths are nesting in Perdido Street Station, he defeats them with the help of the crisis engine and the Weaver.
The whole plot arc where they track the moths down to the cactuar stronghold is awful. It's the kind of garden path story device that makes you say "wait, what? why?" when you realize where China is going with it. I thought it had been fairly heavily implied that the moths were in the Station in the heart of the city... but no, they're nesting here, because oh my gosh I have this idea about my cactus people and Oh My Gosh It's So Cool Let Me Tell You About It! New bit-players are recruited and immediately dispatched in a sequence which doesn't move the main plot at all and worse, doesn't feel justified by in-world logic. It didn't serve any purpose, and was thus frustrating to read.
Also, Lin's kidnapping and subsequent replacement by a different character is totally bizarre and I don't at all understand why it was written this way. There's a love interest for the main character. She gets character development time and is arguably a more interesting person than the main character. Then she gets kidnapped. The main character writes her off as dead, because the kidnapper mailed him her ear-analogue. A new character who serves no narrative purpose joins the party and doesn't ever do anything useful. It's confusing, and weakens Isaac as a character because he doesn't behave like an actual person would. I mean this is his long-term girlfriend, and he's been previously characterized as having an obsessive personality. But no, that's it, he is fine with that answer, she's gone forever. Okay, extended simile time: In Harry Potter #7 during the teleport away from Grimmauld Place, Hermione gets captured by Death Eaters (instead of just getting injured by the botched apparation). Harry and Ron decide that she's probably dead by now and they shouldn't go back. They meet up with Dean Thomas in the woods, and the newly formed threesome decides to investigate Godric's Hollow together. (Hermione isn't mentioned for the next 500 pages then suddenly reappears during the Battle for Hogwarts.) That's what this feels like.
I would here and now like to propose a new rule for fiction, namely: Thou Shalt Have But One Dramatic Plot Twist In The Finale. Corollary: the twist must both enrich and be logically consistent with the rest of the story. You’re maybe allowed two if they’re both cool and seriously Sanderson-in-Mistborn levels of premeditation. The conclusion of this is like if at the end of Sixth Sense Bruce Willis was a ghost, and also the kid and also his mom, and Bruce Willis’s wife was really the murderer. Or maybe a better comparison is that at the end of The Village it turns out that the Outsiders are really the villagers but also! they are ghosts (i.e. the initial plot twist is disappointing and shabby and poorly calculated, perhaps even more so than the addenda). The love interest is alive! Ha-ha! But now she’s dead! I got you so good! Bleh. It’s tiresome and feels disingenuous. I don’t need emotional whiplash to compound your inability to convincingly conclude a story.
This has all been very negative, so why two stars? The first maybe third of the book is comparatively tightly written, especially the construction of the grand escape of the demon caterpillar, and the sketch of the main characters’ love affair. The Weaver is probably the most interesting creature I’ve experienced in the fantasy genre. China came up with a bunch of great ideas,but kept too many for any one or two to get fair shrift, and in general couldn't keep his arms around everything. There’s the skeleton of a great story in here, and it’s frustrating to see it choked by so much adiposity.
My major problem, and this is initially going to sound kind of crazy, is that there's no antagonist. Clearly there's bad guys, we have literal demons menacing the city? Foul thought-vampires bent on destruction!
But they are not compelling to me at all, and it took some soul-searching to come to why. They're not interesting because the slake-moths are the fantasy equivalent of malarial mosquitoes. Their grand endgame is to eat a bunch and then breed. There can't be meaningful opposition if one side of the struggle isn't even sentient. It'd be like if the first 70% of Return of the Jedi were about Luke tracking down and finishing off the wendigo that roughed him up early on. If the solution to your dramatic tension is literally constructing a giant bug-zapper then the conflict can fundamentally not be emotionally compelling.
The 70% thing is the other painful part. There's this sinking feeling associated with reading poorly-paced novels, where it's dragged on and on getting to the confrontation with the main villain, and then you can look forward and see you've got another 100 pages to go. You just know the denouement is going to be painful and/or nonsensical, but at this point you're pretty well stuck, sunk costs.
Here's 7 stupid things that should've been cut:
1. sentient steam-punk robots
2. frog-people
3. hand-people
4. cactus-people
5. rare-beast-hunting mercenaries
6. chimeric crime-bosses
7. the newspaper woman
You're allowed maybe one crazy fantastic innovation every 200 pages. The Weaver, Lin (and associated bug-people), and the slake-moths are allowed to stay. All other darlings must die. Now the story is essentially that Isaac accidentally releases the moths, Lin helps him (instead of the newspaper woman), the moths are nesting in Perdido Street Station, he defeats them with the help of the crisis engine and the Weaver.
The whole plot arc where they track the moths down to the cactuar stronghold is awful. It's the kind of garden path story device that makes you say "wait, what? why?" when you realize where China is going with it. I thought it had been fairly heavily implied that the moths were in the Station in the heart of the city... but no, they're nesting here, because oh my gosh I have this idea about my cactus people and Oh My Gosh It's So Cool Let Me Tell You About It! New bit-players are recruited and immediately dispatched in a sequence which doesn't move the main plot at all and worse, doesn't feel justified by in-world logic. It didn't serve any purpose, and was thus frustrating to read.
Also, Lin's kidnapping and subsequent replacement by a different character is totally bizarre and I don't at all understand why it was written this way. There's a love interest for the main character. She gets character development time and is arguably a more interesting person than the main character. Then she gets kidnapped. The main character writes her off as dead, because the kidnapper mailed him her ear-analogue. A new character who serves no narrative purpose joins the party and doesn't ever do anything useful. It's confusing, and weakens Isaac as a character because he doesn't behave like an actual person would. I mean this is his long-term girlfriend, and he's been previously characterized as having an obsessive personality. But no, that's it, he is fine with that answer, she's gone forever. Okay, extended simile time: In Harry Potter #7 during the teleport away from Grimmauld Place, Hermione gets captured by Death Eaters (instead of just getting injured by the botched apparation). Harry and Ron decide that she's probably dead by now and they shouldn't go back. They meet up with Dean Thomas in the woods, and the newly formed threesome decides to investigate Godric's Hollow together. (Hermione isn't mentioned for the next 500 pages then suddenly reappears during the Battle for Hogwarts.) That's what this feels like.
I would here and now like to propose a new rule for fiction, namely: Thou Shalt Have But One Dramatic Plot Twist In The Finale. Corollary: the twist must both enrich and be logically consistent with the rest of the story. You’re maybe allowed two if they’re both cool and seriously Sanderson-in-Mistborn levels of premeditation. The conclusion of this is like if at the end of Sixth Sense Bruce Willis was a ghost, and also the kid and also his mom, and Bruce Willis’s wife was really the murderer. Or maybe a better comparison is that at the end of The Village it turns out that the Outsiders are really the villagers but also! they are ghosts (i.e. the initial plot twist is disappointing and shabby and poorly calculated, perhaps even more so than the addenda). The love interest is alive! Ha-ha! But now she’s dead! I got you so good! Bleh. It’s tiresome and feels disingenuous. I don’t need emotional whiplash to compound your inability to convincingly conclude a story.
This has all been very negative, so why two stars? The first maybe third of the book is comparatively tightly written, especially the construction of the grand escape of the demon caterpillar, and the sketch of the main characters’ love affair. The Weaver is probably the most interesting creature I’ve experienced in the fantasy genre. China came up with a bunch of great ideas,but kept too many for any one or two to get fair shrift, and in general couldn't keep his arms around everything. There’s the skeleton of a great story in here, and it’s frustrating to see it choked by so much adiposity.
adventurous
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
adventurous
challenging
dark
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Probably one of the best books I've ever read. A fantastically realized world, sculpted with immense detail but never tedious to learn about and never a thing I got lost in. The characters were distinct and interesting, and the plot was a wide web of fascinating ideas that continued to meld together in satisfying ways. The prose is gorgeous, the dialogue and emotion incredibly human, and the horror unfathomable.
Slightest spoilers ahead? My only issue is the ending, which really turned me off philosophically and morally in the last ten or so pages, but I don't think I can fairly fault a 700 page book that I considered one of the best I'd ever read for the last 10, especially when the book leading up to it wasn't particularly hopeful, optimistic, or moral (nor was the rest of the ending). For the story it was, the ending works well. Things stay shades of grey, and there is no set argument for what is right and wrong, but a simple assertion that reality lies somewhere in between.
Would highly recommend.
Slightest spoilers ahead? My only issue is the ending, which really turned me off philosophically and morally in the last ten or so pages, but I don't think I can fairly fault a 700 page book that I considered one of the best I'd ever read for the last 10, especially when the book leading up to it wasn't particularly hopeful, optimistic, or moral (nor was the rest of the ending). For the story it was, the ending works well. Things stay shades of grey, and there is no set argument for what is right and wrong, but a simple assertion that reality lies somewhere in between.
Would highly recommend.
adventurous
challenging
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes