Reviews

Alexandria by Paul Kingsnorth

jwebster's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious

3.25

This was weird but I didn’t hate it? Once you get into the style you can zoom through it but not sure enough happened in the end. 

sonofatreus's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I generally didn't care for this book for most of it. I almost quit it entirely somewhere around 1/4 through, but finished it out of my love for The Wake, the first of this trilogy. I came around a little more to it in the latter half, but it still wasn't my jam.

Like The Wake, this mostly isn't written in modern English. Here, it's another shadow tongue, I suppose, projecting what English might be like several hundred years in the future. Some of Kingsnorth's choices make sense (there are fewer double consonants like "ck" when a simple "k" will do; several double vowel diphthongs are also reduced), but others are real head scratchers (I'm not sure why "yesterday" would become "yester day" or "another" become "an other" (if anything, I'd guess that become "a nother")). There's also relatively little punctuation, and grammatical structure is looser. Some pronouns, like "my" are gone in favor of "me." On the whole, I found it pretty readable, if puzzling sometimes.

In terms of the story, it's set several hundred years after humanity has completely screwed up the earth with climate change. There are only a handful of humans left, and most animals seem to be gone too. At the same time, there is still this AI construct that exists at a distance. The story involves the handful of humans interacting with an emissary of that AI, who is trying to recruit them individually to join in the construct. It sounds like a stand-in for Heaven, but the remaining humans have their own religious system that makes this seem threatening to them. They even have a mythology, clearly derived from Christianity/Judaism, wherein a certain Sir Pent once deceived humans and set them on their course to ruin (

ekbehren's review

Go to review page

1.0

If I could give 0 stars I would

eplozano's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Boring, pretentious, a waste. 

andrewacashner's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

andreaedits's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

booccmaster's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

annarella's review

Go to review page

3.0

I discovered this is part of a trilogy so I assume that some of issues could be caused by not having read the other books.
I thinks it's well written but I could warm up to the story and it fell flat.
Not my cup of tea.
Many thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for this ARC, all opinions are mine

ipb1's review

Go to review page

4.0

Compelling, but this third in the 'trilogy' (in the loosest sense) is marred by a more obvious polemic than the first two books. As with the pseudo-Anglo-Saxon of the excellent [b:The Wake|21023409|The Wake|Paul Kingsnorth|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1394363896l/21023409._SY75_.jpg|27232308], Alexandria uses its own distinctive future dialect to good effect. More 3.5 than 4, but I've just had my Covid jab so am feeling generous.

jenhm's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5