Reviews with content warning for Genocide - Elantris

Some more top-notch fantasy from Brandon Sanderson. I didn't love it quite as much as Mistborn era 1 - I just didn't gel with one of the POVs and felt myself rushing through those bits to get to the others, and the ending didn't feel as powerful to me - but I appreciated having a little standalone reading 'break' in my Sanderson journey!

Elantris spends more time exploring the politics if and relationships in a fantasy world, more than the magical elements of it, which I personally enjoyed but others may not.

Content Warnings

iono's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Content Warnings

apersonfromflorida's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Content Warnings

leocancer's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Content Warnings

lilifane's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Everyone warns people not to start reading Brandon Sanderson with this book, but I always want to experience a complex book universe in the publication order. So I started with Elantris, but told myself that it doesn't matter how much I hate it, I will definitely still read Mistborn at least.

To my biggest surprise I actually really enjoyed this book and if this is his weakest one... okay.

It certainly has its issues. Most of the characters are pretty flat and boring (although I like most of them without a doubt). I think there is only one character that is actually complex and interesting. And the whole political plot didn't interest me that much, I just didn't care for it and I think it dragged on for too long. I didn't care for the king and this baby monarchy, I didn't care for the nobility. I might have cared for the peasants, but they were basically absent from the plot, although they had so much more potential?

The rest of the book? I loved it! The world building is phenomenal, I enjoyed the magic system a lot, everything about Elantris (history, mystery, present state) is so cool and fascinating, and I flew through these chapters. The story was really well plotted in my opinion, all the small details that became important at the end and fit perfectly together. Ah, I love this. (I'm just a little sad the final Elantris mystery wasn't really explained. That scene was so confusing, and I don't know what happened there. I have a vague idea, but it's bothering me not to know the details!)

Also: Although I know, Sanderson discusses mental health in his books, I wasn't aware it was already so present in this first one. The way the suffering of Elantrians can be compared to depression really impressed me.

Content Warnings

diana_barv's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25

Well I'll be dammed. I am back on my fantasy-loving bs; expect a lot of cosmere reviews in the next months. I had intended to read more of them but finally, Jack convinced me by constantly making references to them and I wanted in on the joke.
Oh Elantris, for a first work it is surprisingly solid and I could see the roots of the style I so loved in Mistborn. The 3 POVs were very solid as was the world building. I could read an entire book on pre Shaod Elantris tho.
Sarene has everything I could wish in a protagonist, she was witty and bold and yet she had insecurities and fears. I loved her banter with Spirit.
Raoden was every bit a "good Prince this kingdom needs" but it slaps. His endless optimism was wonderful and I would have loved to see what he could have achieved with new elantris, separated from him as king of Arelon. Galladon (my beloved) was right, this dude was a sappy romantic and you know what? Some straights do deserve rights and him and Sarene were meant to be.
Hrathen's arc... sir, Mr. Gyron... holy shit. I am still unconvinced if I liked the last bit. His story was so complex and I loved the way he approached his mission and how strong his morals were, autodeception aside. He had purpose despite his lack of faith and he tried to mend his ways at the very end. BUT I do question his motivation. He and Sarene had mutual respect as opponents and barely. This was not an enemies to lovers and I think respect->admiration->love would have taken a bit more time. I feel that he could have realized he had faith in the people more than in his God's will (which was more Wrym's than a divine mandate but theological discussed will take us nowhere) And avoid parting with a dumbass confession he didn't even voiced.
Other random things that kept me from 5 stars are the weird shit with the king's rituals and lack of acknowledgement later. The "pope" who just came to read the frankly ex-machina decree. Sarene taking advantage of the shock; no way the people would have just calmly accepted an elantrian as king, not even their beloved returned-from-death prince.
Adien or whomever. He... No. Bad autistic rep. I am not well informed to give the particulars of why (Jack had however told me he IS bad rep and I trust her first-hand judgment) but even I know that was so wrong.
The pace was a bit funky, the last 3rd was super packed! But all in all I enjoyed it immensely. I even cried when I thought all elantrians lost forever. I am definitely going into the storm light archive next. Wish me luck.

Content Warnings

sashafriese's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

ggcd1981's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

Essa é minha segunda experiência com Brandon Sanderson (a primeira foi White sand) e dessa vez eu “remei” mais do que na primeira experiência. Em 2021, até o momento, este foi o livro que levei mais tempo para concluir. Elantris não é ruim, na verdade é uma história bem diferente do que tenho lido até agora. Assim, foi novidade para mim um livro tão focado em maquinações políticas. Porém tive a sensação que a narrativa era lenta, tanto pela história ser de passo lento quanto pelo narrador, Jack Garrett, narrar de forma bastante espaçada (Vale acrescentar que pode ter sido a edição do áudio e não a narração de Garrett que deixou a história lenta, é difícil determinar a causa). Acrescentando o fato de que há relativamente pouca ação na narrativa e Elantris me deu a sensação de que se movia a passo de tartaruga, apesar de ter sido um bom livro.

Vamos ressaltar os pontos positivos da obra: Personagens agradáveis por quem pude torcer, como Raoden, Sarene, Galladon e até mesmo Hrathen, o antagonista inicial; Ótima personagem feminina (Sarene), mentalmente forte, com muita agência, e enredo próprio em separado de seu par romântico; Raoden foi um excelente protagonista que resolvia os problemas com inteligência e diplomacia já que não possui muitas habilidades de combate; Hrathen foi um antagonista interessante com aspectos de personalidade conflitantes que deixavam o seu futuro ambíguo, com um final que satisfez (ele ter começado como antagonista e terminado como herói do país foi um ótimo final); O desenvolvimento da histórica foi em maior parte imprevisível para mim e a conclusão foi satisfatória, respondendo todas as minhas perguntas razoavelmente bem.

Não houveram muitos pontos negativos para mim, os únicos que posso apontar foram mais uma questão de gosto pessoal: gosto de um pouco mais de ação em livros de Fantasia, mas compreendo porque Sanderson concentrou a ação no fim; as tentativas de humor durante a história foram um pouco embaraçosamente executadas, apesar de terem sido importantes para mostrar personagens desenvolvendo laços; Por último, o que já havia mencionado, seja pela edição de áudio ou pela narração, em conjunção com o enredo de passo lento e pouca ação fizeram com que eu tivesse a sensação de que a história era muito mais longa do que realmente era.

Um ponto ambíguo foi o personagem Dilaf, porque por muito tempo no livro eu considerei o personagem muito interessante e assustador. Por ser fanático religioso o personagem parecia não ter limites para seu ódio. Isso para mim, por causa de minhas experiências pessoais com fanatismo religioso, é bastante assustador. Contudo, no final o fanatismo religioso foi na verdade revelado ter por base o desejo de vingança por uma perda sofrida, e de certa forma Dilaf perdeu, em minha opinião, a aura de perigo e imprevisibilidade. Acho q foi um ótimo personagem que se perdeu um pouco na conclusão.

Minha opinião geral é que foi uma história de intriga política e religiosa bem escrita e com personagens interessantes, contudo a sensação de lentidão da história me impede der dar uma nota maior. Desta forma dou 4 estrelas.

Content Warnings

More...