3.05 AVERAGE

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny informative sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

WTF did I just read 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

This might've been fun to write, but I don't think Mr. Palahniuk liked his characters very much. Seems like a kind of gross shock and awe, some moments of humor, and a bitter caricature of California.

2.5
funny lighthearted fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: N/A
challenging fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

poquito lameeee
dark funny fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Loveable characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Fuera del morbo que pueda levantar la contraportada, el libro no trata de perversión, porno, etc. Es el tronco del libro, pero no lo que le da sabor. A qué me refiero, bueno, cuando lees algo común como papas y bronceador en un libro de Palahniuk, no es precisamente la mejor imagen del mundo. Este sujeto hace que te de asco, pone interés en que te fijes en los detalles.

Todo gira alrededor de 4 narradores, señor 72, señor 137, señor 600 y Sheila. Sus puntos de vista de una situación, su historia, sus traumas, sus logros, sus temores, sus fijaciones, sus debilidades y el porqué están involucrados en la filmación de semejante película.

Awful! I'm a fan of an occasional Palahniuk book, but this was a waste of time. It was nothing but pornography, which isn't my thing.
dark slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes