You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

539 reviews for:

Bad Science

Ben Goldacre

4.09 AVERAGE


A must read, particularly for those who will never pick this book up. I found this to be slow at the start; maybe poor nutrition advice, homeopathy and nonsense health advise have become more accepted as BS in the decade since this book was published (maybe not)? That said, I learned a lot of terrifying specifics about many relevant topics!This should be required reading in high school psychology/health classes.

Big pharma lies, and homeopathy is bogus.

Reading this was quite an eye-opener. What started as a lighthearted, witty talk, by the end of the bok took some serious turns, for the good. Not only I learned about how one should assess scientific knowledge but also how it can be manipulated by some quacks and cranks for their own gain, risking lives of numerous innocents. Well, that justifies the aggressiveness of the author. But there is hope in this and I will stand by it, by science.

I'd recommend that everyone should read this book. I don't care what the review says, you can decide what you agree with or not after reading.

Interesting; fast read; good introduction to basic statistics and scientific methodology...however, he's seriously ranty. Two thirds of the way through most chapters I jumped forward because he had devolved into ranting. The first 2/3rds were fun though.

*3.5⭐️

My only disappointment is that going into this book, I thought I would be learning more about how to interpret date and statistics to make the best judgments/arguments regarding scientific studies. This book provides more of an application of someone who has already interpreted the data and their take on it, which is fine—and was still very insightful, it just wasn’t exactly what I had hoped for from this book. What I enjoyed the most about this book is the doctor speaking to the audience like they are not incapable of understanding scientific concepts, even without formal training, that if you have a passion for science, it is available to all.
funny informative reflective medium-paced

I expected more information and background about the science itself, but the book focuses more on media, journalism and personalities. Personalities I never heard about before, because I'm not in the UK and it's no longer 2008. But the theme is also still relevant. On some points more relevant than ever, since social media is even worse than the media he's fighting against. There are some useful bits throughout about what to pay attention to, to spot the bad science and unscientific reporting. They're well explained and easy to understand. Yet I had hoped for more. 

gunvorkirk's review

2.0

I had hoped this book had been about science. However, it is one long rant about journalists’ poor statistics knowledge (I agree, but several doctors I have met are on the same level, and they are also too self-absorbed to know when they are wrong). I don’t disagree with the criticism of snake oil vendors and bias, but this book is too self-absorbed to see the true reasons people buy into snake oil vendors. That many doctors have limited time for patients, don’t trust a patient’s experience and are unable to read and understand papers containing knowledge younger than when they themself attended med-school.
challenging funny informative slow-paced

I learned a lot about some shams, some of the actual science behind it. Not sure on the section on skincare, I think this guy naturally had great skin from birth because I dunno about him but personally my face doesn't auto-regulate itself into perfection without some products.
challenging informative reflective medium-paced