Scan barcode
whitneyborup's review against another edition
2.0
What smut! And smut's great and all, but it got very repetitive and by the end I was getting really sick of penises.
lorenrs's review against another edition
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.5
josephinelemonade's review against another edition
2.0
i skipped the last 20 pages of this because it made me too angry lmao.
as a literature enthusiast, this is a really interesting book to read. aside from that though, it's incredibly outdated.
i will say though, props to john cleland for writing basically 200 pages of porn and somehow making it somewhat interesting.
as a literature enthusiast, this is a really interesting book to read. aside from that though, it's incredibly outdated.
i will say though, props to john cleland for writing basically 200 pages of porn and somehow making it somewhat interesting.
droemmelig's review against another edition
1.0
Thank goodness! I managed to plough through that horrible ranting writing style - only because I wanted to be able to say "I've read Fanny Hill!".
Now, I don't even know why I ever thought it would have been cool to claim such a thing. The story is pretty much incomprehensible, except for the graphic smut scenes - which are EVERYWHERE. I found it easiest to read while being (slightly) inebriated.
Now, I don't even know why I ever thought it would have been cool to claim such a thing. The story is pretty much incomprehensible, except for the graphic smut scenes - which are EVERYWHERE. I found it easiest to read while being (slightly) inebriated.
peachani's review against another edition
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Content Warnings
Moderate: Sexual content