Reviews

Waiting for Sunrise by William Boyd

jdintr's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A clever spy story that takes begins in Vienna on the eve of the First World War. Lysander Rief travels from London to seek help from the new therapy of psychoanalysis, but what he finds in fin de siecle Vienna is a "river of sex" that promises to do far more than cure his mama issues.

Just outside his therapist's office, Rief meets Hetty Bull, a seductive sculptor who casts him under her spell until dramatic events: a false rape charge, the death of the crown prince, send Rief back home to London and plunge Europe into a great war.

I read this book in advance of a trip to Vienna, and I really enjoyed the Viennese scenes and the peek into the pre-war era that it provides. Once the action moves to Britain, Rief's acting skills are put to the test as he is forced to uncover a spy embedded high in the British armed forces.

Waiting for Sunrise is more than a spy novel, more than a novel of place. It is a well-written, tightly paced, often surprising tale.

60degreesn's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Enjoyed early 19th century novel from Boyd. I found it quite comparable to Restless, better than Ordinary Thunderstorms, but slighter and without the weight of Any Human Heart, Brazzaville Beach , or New Confessions.

margaret21's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Lysander Rief is an actor taking time in Vienna to sort out his sexual problems. Betrayed after a tempestuous love affair, he gets drawn into the First World War as an intelliegence officer in quest of a traitor. Though the morally ambiguous Rief is not an entirely attractive character, Boyd's sense of time and place and his weaving of a complex pacey and plausible plot makes for a compulsive page-turner. I got a bit lost at the end: I'm obviously not cut out for a career as any kind of intelligence officer. But who cares? I had a very good read.

rpc_2024's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Confusing, enjoyed the story but too many unresolved questions.

kelbi's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Very complex but extremely good

bunnieslikediamonds's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

An odd but entertaining spy novel, or a psychological thriller, or maybe a period piece. Atmospheric and light-hearted, in starts off in Vienna in 1914 before relocating to London where the spying commences. I much preferred the Vienna setting and young Lysander Rief's efforts to sort out his sexual problems through psychoanalysis (which he does, succesfully, becoming quite the ladies' man). The rest of it isn't bad at all, just a little disjointed. A fun read.

mike_brough's review against another edition

Go to review page

I must be missing something. This was a relatively straightforward spy thriller, set just before and during the First World War. A bit of military action, a bit of psycho-analysis and a bit of sex. But, unless there was a sub-text or allegory that passed me by, that's all it was.

I believe that Boyd will be writing the next James Bond and, based on this, it will be very good but... that's about it.

Did I miss something?

pelicaaan's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Disappointing.

tuomosuominen's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I’ve become quite a fan of William Boyd’s historical espionage thrillers. Both Boyd novels I’ve read this far (’Restless’ and ’Before Sunrise’) offer a fresh and exciting twist of the Joseph Kanon and Alan Furst formula that I’ve enjoyed over the years. Must absolutely have a further look into Boyd’s extensive catalog. Highly recommended, if Kanon and Furst appeal at all.

fictionfan's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Spies and lies...

When young actor Lysander Rief consults an eminent psychiatrist in pre-WW1 Vienna about a problem, Dr Bensimon introduces him to the concept of parallelism. A technique developed by the good doctor himself, the idea is to identify the event at the root of a problem and then to invent an alternative history of the event, embellishing and repeating it until it feels like a truer memory than the thing that actually happened. And this book feels like an exercise in parallelism itself – a hazy, shimmering story that seems just a little unreal, a little off-kilter. As Lysander gets sucked into the shadowy world of spies and espionage, it all feels like a bit of a game – an adventure. And despite some dark moments, it continues to feel like that all the way through, as if Lysander is playing a role in one of the great spy thrillers of the past. There are scenes that reminded me of The Third Man, with shadowy figures hiding in alleyways, and the characters, with the exception of Lysander himself, feel like representations of fictional 'types' rather than real people – the mysterious femme fatale, the traitor, the manipulative spymaster, etc.
“Let's say that the world is in essence neutral – flat, empty, bereft of meaning and significance. It’s us, our imaginations, that make it vivid, fill it with colour, feeling, purpose and emotion. Once we understand this we can shape our world in any way we want. In theory.”

Lysander's little problem is of course sexual, arising from an excruciatingly embarrassing (but very funny) episode in his youth. Encouraged by Dr Bensimon, he keeps a journal which forms part of the narrative, allowing the reader to see the world through his eyes. Coincidentally, it's at Dr Bensimon's office that he first meets Hettie, the woman who will firstly help cure his problem, and then be instrumental in creating the situation that later forces him into the world of spying. And coincidentally, the man who will be his spymaster also first meets Lysander in the doctor's waiting room. All of these coincidences, and the many others that follow, are hardly coincidental though. Even Lysander begins to wonder eventually why everyone he meets seems to be something other than they appear at first sight.

The book is about deception, self-deception and lies. And that deception extends to the reader too. There are elements of the plot that are almost farcical in their unlikeliness, and dark moments that are glossed over with such subtle humour that sometimes it takes a moment or two to decide just how seriously they should be taken. Looking at reviews of the book tells me some people have taken it completely seriously and are therefore complaining about credibility issues, especially with the ending. And they may be right. But my perception of the whole thing is that it's a frothy construct, a parallel to the truly dark stories of wartime espionage, something imagined to shape the world in the way that Lysander wants. Having learned from Dr Bensimon how to obliterate unpleasant truths from his mind, it seems to me that the book extends this idea – so, bad things happen but Lysander, and the reader, choose not to dwell on them. It feels as if a false memory is being created as the reader watches, and to a degree the reader has to agree to be complicit in its creation.
Lysander had done his best to answer the questions seriously because he knew that Davison [the director of the play] had gone to Russia a year before, had met Stanislavski and had fallen under the sway of his new theories about acting and drama, and was convinced that all this extraneous material and information that one invented fleshed out the character and bolstered the text. Lysander felt like saying that if Shakespeare had wanted us to know that Angelo was well travelled or suffered from piles he would have dropped in a line or two in the play to that effect.

As always with Boyd, the writing is eminently readable – smooth, flowing, neither forced nor artificial, but with a lovely use of language. There is a lot about sex in the book, but it's not at all graphic or icky (yes, I still haven't got those scenes in Birdsong out of my head) – instead it takes the route of gentle mockery, highlighting the more ridiculous side of the act. Lysander is a great character, self-absorbed, self-deceiving, but fundamentally a good guy with a too-trusting nature and a kind of relaxed, go where the wind blows him attitude that makes him a pleasure to spend time with. Boyd is rarely laugh out loud funny, but I love the way he keeps a layer of gentle humour simmering beneath the surface, lightening the tone and keeping the reader slightly off-balance. He's one of those authors who can be off-form from time to time, but when he's on form, as he is in this one, there are few writers I enjoy more. Highly recommended.

www.fictionfanblog.wordpress.com