Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.07 AVERAGE
4.07 AVERAGE
emotional
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
emotional
funny
lighthearted
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
challenging
dark
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Turns out I've been reading the wrong Brontës. Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights have never been my favourites, Jane Eyre being simultaneously overly prosaic and overly romantic, and Wuthering Heights overblown with unsympathetic and uninteresting characters. But the Tenant of Wildfell Hall is realistic, radical and passionate in its advocacy for women. Its treatment of addiction and misogyny is light years ahead of its time and all tbe characterisations nuanced and sensitive. This stands up well woth the best of 19th century novels, for me, as readable and relevant as Middlemarch or Emma. So glad to finally read this.
And behold....
...my favorite Brontë book!
(though I'll have to reread Villette and Jane Eyre just to be sure)
The first chapter introduces us to a compelling man, Gilbert Markham, writing a letter to his brother-in-law about Mrs. Helen Graham, who has moved into the neighborhood with her child. Eventually her neighbors draw her out and she and Gilbert clash quite a few times: she, quick to judge him, and he, eager to prove her opinion of him wrong.
As he grows to know her, Gilbert is stimulated by her mind and grows to admire her quiet intellect and strength. Eventually we come to read her diary about her former life before she moved to the neighborhood, a necessity after the shocking things Gilbert hears circulated about her.
Suffice to say, the strength and be beauty of this novel requires me to reveal one spoiler, Although it's pretty easy to guess, even before you begin your read, I'd caution you to stop here if you don't want that spoiler revealed.
Now enjoy my buffer-gif so you don't see any spoilers if you've decided to stop reading.
Wow, the strength that is in this novel!!
I applaud Anne for being the first author in the regency era to show that a woman can leave her abusive husband and go on to live a happy, full life. Here is a woman who loves, learns, leaves, and loves again without succumbing to sickness or poverty (as was often the depiction).
There is some popular, "romantic" notion that a bad boy (or the more appropriate reformed rake in regency lingo), if tamed by a pure, loving heart, makes the best lover and the happiest marriage. Especially if he loves a virginal woman.
Can I ask why this trend became popular? Between the two classes of bad boy: someone with a tortured past and hedonism (the partier playboy), we are examining the second.
"Everyone knows reformed rakes make the best husbands."
Why? Why would an emotionally unhealthy person, someone used to thinking of themselves and doing whatever they wanted to do, regardless of others, be the ideal partner?
When Helen first meets Mr. Huntingdon, he is high spirited and handsome. He's utterly charming, and utterly in pursuit of her, and, though she knows he's not as virtuous as he might be, she makes the decision to trust that he is essentially good, and that she will break him of his partying ways. Her steadfast love, her devotion and heart, can save him.
Sadly, that is not the case.
Perhaps this is another point that makes this novel so compelling: Helen isn't dumb. In fact, she's the opposite: sharp and discerning and strong-willed. This novel shows that it can happen to anyone. Even your friend with her feet most firmly planted on the ground can ignore every red flag and fall into a toxic relationship.
In a gradual fall to disillusionment, Helen still struggles to save her husband. She gives herself again and again to an ungrateful recipient. Though never physically abusive, her husband is certainly a psychological abuser.
Helen is only ever good to him, but he claims it must be to serve her own ego or so that she can feel self-righteous and lord her morality over him. She cries when she hears about the wild way he "used" to live his life, and he laughs and claims she's jealous. Huntingdon is unable to comprehend that someone might act selflessly towards another because he has never done so, and thus he treats her kindness accordingly.
He falls into alcoholism, an issue I've never seen so frankly addressed in a regency novel before this one. (Again, bravo Anne!) He embodies every vice, every vulgar habit that Helen despises.
Her unfailing hope, her seemingly endless strength, her power to stick to her beliefs and personal morality, her unwillingness to abandon her husband to his evils if she thought she could be of service to his soul, is nothing short of incredible.
And then there is poor sweet Gilbert.
Ah, now we come to the heart of that matter.
This book is challenging and powerful and, I might add, feminist. Feminism is a broad spectrum where there are many different thoughts, sometimes contradicting beliefs, but what in life is perfect? Examine the character of Helen! Test her fiber. I found much to admire.
And with that everyone, I urge you to go read this book!! It's very, very good.
...my favorite Brontë book!
(though I'll have to reread Villette and Jane Eyre just to be sure)
The first chapter introduces us to a compelling man, Gilbert Markham, writing a letter to his brother-in-law about Mrs. Helen Graham, who has moved into the neighborhood with her child. Eventually her neighbors draw her out and she and Gilbert clash quite a few times: she, quick to judge him, and he, eager to prove her opinion of him wrong.
As he grows to know her, Gilbert is stimulated by her mind and grows to admire her quiet intellect and strength. Eventually we come to read her diary about her former life before she moved to the neighborhood, a necessity after the shocking things Gilbert hears circulated about her.
Suffice to say, the strength and be beauty of this novel requires me to reveal one spoiler,
Spoiler
the alcoholic, abusive husband Helen leaves.Now enjoy my buffer-gif so you don't see any spoilers if you've decided to stop reading.
Wow, the strength that is in this novel!!
I applaud Anne for being the first author in the regency era to show that a woman can leave her abusive husband and go on to live a happy, full life. Here is a woman who loves, learns, leaves, and loves again without succumbing to sickness or poverty (as was often the depiction).
There is some popular, "romantic" notion that a bad boy (or the more appropriate reformed rake in regency lingo), if tamed by a pure, loving heart, makes the best lover and the happiest marriage. Especially if he loves a virginal woman.
Can I ask why this trend became popular? Between the two classes of bad boy: someone with a tortured past and hedonism (the partier playboy), we are examining the second.
"Everyone knows reformed rakes make the best husbands."
Why? Why would an emotionally unhealthy person, someone used to thinking of themselves and doing whatever they wanted to do, regardless of others, be the ideal partner?
When Helen first meets Mr. Huntingdon, he is high spirited and handsome. He's utterly charming, and utterly in pursuit of her, and, though she knows he's not as virtuous as he might be, she makes the decision to trust that he is essentially good, and that she will break him of his partying ways. Her steadfast love, her devotion and heart, can save him.
Sadly, that is not the case.
Perhaps this is another point that makes this novel so compelling: Helen isn't dumb. In fact, she's the opposite: sharp and discerning and strong-willed. This novel shows that it can happen to anyone. Even your friend with her feet most firmly planted on the ground can ignore every red flag and fall into a toxic relationship.
In a gradual fall to disillusionment, Helen still struggles to save her husband. She gives herself again and again to an ungrateful recipient. Though never physically abusive, her husband is certainly a psychological abuser.
Helen is only ever good to him, but he claims it must be to serve her own ego or so that she can feel self-righteous and lord her morality over him. She cries when she hears about the wild way he "used" to live his life, and he laughs and claims she's jealous. Huntingdon is unable to comprehend that someone might act selflessly towards another because he has never done so, and thus he treats her kindness accordingly.
He falls into alcoholism, an issue I've never seen so frankly addressed in a regency novel before this one. (Again, bravo Anne!) He embodies every vice, every vulgar habit that Helen despises.
Her unfailing hope, her seemingly endless strength, her power to stick to her beliefs and personal morality, her unwillingness to abandon her husband to his evils if she thought she could be of service to his soul, is nothing short of incredible.
And then there is poor sweet Gilbert.
Ah, now we come to the heart of that matter.
Spoiler
They cannot be together, for she is a married woman.This book is challenging and powerful and, I might add, feminist. Feminism is a broad spectrum where there are many different thoughts, sometimes contradicting beliefs, but what in life is perfect? Examine the character of Helen! Test her fiber. I found much to admire.
And with that everyone, I urge you to go read this book!! It's very, very good.
In it's first publication 'The Tenant of Wildfell Hall' was described as being 'course' and 'disgusting.' I I can well imagine the impact that it had on prudish Victorians. However, it's very tame by today's standards and the shock element at all the debauchery portrayed in the novel is missing. A modern reader would just be like: 'Meh I've read worse.'
Nevertheless, the message of this novel remains as firm as ever: don't marry a scumbag with the expectation that you can one day reform them through the power of love.
I enjoyed The Tenant of Wildfell Hall more than I expected. I thought that due to its lack of popularity that it would be lame or boring in comparison to the other novels written by the Bronte sisters. Although the novel is not as great as Jane Eyre, I think it's equal to Wuthering Heights.
The Romance between Gilbert and Helen did not interest me. It was quite lukewarm. I suppose that's the reason for its lack of popularity. It was Helen's story that really gripped me. If the story had revolved only around Gilbert (as it did in the beginning), I would have given it only two stars. Gilbert was quite a childish and petulant character. On the other hand, Helen was more of an admirable heroine.
Nevertheless, the message of this novel remains as firm as ever: don't marry a scumbag with the expectation that you can one day reform them through the power of love.
I enjoyed The Tenant of Wildfell Hall more than I expected. I thought that due to its lack of popularity that it would be lame or boring in comparison to the other novels written by the Bronte sisters. Although the novel is not as great as Jane Eyre, I think it's equal to Wuthering Heights.
The Romance between Gilbert and Helen did not interest me. It was quite lukewarm. I suppose that's the reason for its lack of popularity. It was Helen's story that really gripped me. If the story had revolved only around Gilbert (as it did in the beginning), I would have given it only two stars. Gilbert was quite a childish and petulant character. On the other hand, Helen was more of an admirable heroine.
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
emotional
reflective
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
dark
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
reflective
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
I get that classics like to be lengthy, but that really is the fault at times.