Scan barcode
gtsantos83's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Louisa, Karina, Robert, and Preston. Four artists/main characters tied together by their presence at Wrynn - a prestigious art school in New England. They are uniquely talented, but at much different stages in their careers/goals and ambitions. Roommates Louisa and Karina are both misunderstood by the other until their mutual attraction spurs an intense romance. Preston is a PITA as a student and an artist, but his work does make an impact. I personally found him insufferable, although his childhood and challenges did humanize him. When a project/prank leads to our main 4 parting ways with Wrynn, they all begin to explore themselves more as artists and as people as their lives entwine and reconnect in new ways. I especially enjoyed following Louisa's growth. Karina is clearly her muse, and I loved how she began to take creative and personal risks, while still staying grounded and connected to the family and home she loves. Karina also grows in her ability to open up and eventually let Louisa into her heart. She leans into her talents and creativity and never stops to question or second guess it. Her relationships with Allison and Preston drag her down and appear toxic, and she equally drags them as well. Her reconnection with Louisa is fulfilling to them both. At first I found the Robert chapters to be kind of a drag, but around the time he connects with young tutee Adrian, a new confidence and happiness emerge, and his story ends on a more hopeful note. I like how there is an open-ended resolution that leaves several options on the table for all 4 characters, for better or for worse.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Suicide, Sexual assault, and Drug use
sealbrecht's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexual content, Sexual assault, Infidelity, Drug use, Toxic relationship, and Suicidal thoughts
Moderate: Mental illness, Physical abuse, Death, and Suicide
fionamclary's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
hopeful
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Well, I'm sad to say that the quest for a truly excellent sapphic academia continues. Although I liked this a good deal better than the last sapphic dark academia I read, I still found some things lacking.
Like many readers, I had a hard time seeing how all four perspectives fit together. Often it felt like I was reading two to three different books. I think if all four characters had personal connections to each other, it would have worked much better. As it was, basically the only character that Louisa had any relation to was Karina. This made the different perspectives feel additionally disjointed. However, all characters went through satisfying development, whether for better or for worse. Preston, falling into the latter category, ended up being an interesting vehicle for exploring the intersection of art, capitalism, and the 2010s internet through a lens that captured both the 2011-2012 setting of the book and the hindsight that the author has 10 years later.
Speaking of the early 2010s...a small thing that bothered the heck out of me was the timeline of Preston's Tumblr. The book says that he started it shortly after his mother's death, which happened when he was 14. This would have been 7-8 years before the events of the book. Tumblr was launched in 2007, 4-5 years before the events of the book. I was surprised that a Millennial author would get this detail wrong—and she could have resolved it by saying that he started on another platform and then migrated to Tumblr, but no, it explicitly says that he started his Tumblr soon after his mom died. This bugged me way too much but I don't think it's an unreasonable thing to get right. Am I crazy??
I read this book in April 2024, as I'm watching encampments protesting the genocide in Gaza go up on university campuses across the country, so the Occupy setting of this book felt especially timely. I might recommend this book to anyone looking for parallels in their reading life to current events.
Anyway, I think this would be a solid read for the art girlies looking for something meditative and gay. Just don't expect it to be The queer academia of all time.
Like many readers, I had a hard time seeing how all four perspectives fit together. Often it felt like I was reading two to three different books. I think if all four characters had personal connections to each other, it would have worked much better. As it was, basically the only character that Louisa had any relation to was Karina. This made the different perspectives feel additionally disjointed. However, all characters went through satisfying development, whether for better or for worse. Preston, falling into the latter category, ended up being an interesting vehicle for exploring the intersection of art, capitalism, and the 2010s internet through a lens that captured both the 2011-2012 setting of the book and the hindsight that the author has 10 years later.
Speaking of the early 2010s...a small thing that bothered the heck out of me was the timeline of Preston's Tumblr. The book says that he started it shortly after his mother's death, which happened when he was 14. This would have been 7-8 years before the events of the book. Tumblr was launched in 2007, 4-5 years before the events of the book. I was surprised that a Millennial author would get this detail wrong—and she could have resolved it by saying that he started on another platform and then migrated to Tumblr, but no, it explicitly says that he started his Tumblr soon after his mom died. This bugged me way too much but I don't think it's an unreasonable thing to get right. Am I crazy??
I read this book in April 2024, as I'm watching encampments protesting the genocide in Gaza go up on university campuses across the country, so the Occupy setting of this book felt especially timely. I might recommend this book to anyone looking for parallels in their reading life to current events.
Anyway, I think this would be a solid read for the art girlies looking for something meditative and gay. Just don't expect it to be The queer academia of all time.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Infidelity, Drug use, Classism, Alcohol, and Domestic abuse
Moderate: Sexual assault, Sexual content, Cursing, Mental illness, Terminal illness, Suicide, Death, Dementia, and Suicidal thoughts
Minor: Lesbophobia, Bullying, Police brutality, Grief, and Homophobia
paradicsomleves's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug use, Toxic relationship, Mental illness, Sexual content, and Alcohol
Moderate: Death of parent, Rape, and Sexual assault
Minor: Suicide
hannahleewhite's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
tense
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Content Warnings
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Sexual assault
Minor: Dementia, Mental illness, Drug use, and Suicide
noahbenoit's review against another edition
dark
emotional
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
beautifully written, but i'm getting tired of all queer books having the same kind of vibe and narrative (broken unreliable cold modern characters have toxic relationships together and dread on life), this is for sure playing that trope with very little plot! i feel like this masterful prose + fertile context could have given way more
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape
Moderate: Suicide and Domestic abuse
queenkath32's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
3.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Drug use, Infidelity, Toxic relationship, Death, Physical abuse, Sexual harassment, and Suicide
sophiamcd's review against another edition
hopeful
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault, Domestic abuse, and Suicide
m1923's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault
Moderate: Suicide and Death of parent
erinpoo's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
“Often, Karina would come home to find that Louisa had spent the evening painting swampy landscapes or fantastical birds or great, greedy, oceanic swaths of sky, the kind of sky that didn’t exist in New York and never would.”
my reverence for this book transcends all limits of language. in every way, this was a breathtaking kunstlerroman. it was magnetic, and it holds your attention even as it is fractured into different voices and perspectives; you’re never really broken out of the story until you arrive at the very ending (which still haunts me to this day). it’s just such an enrapturing depiction of the [contemporary] art world, of ambition and academia. at some point it unraveled a provocative discussion around how cutthroat the industry is, and how brutal it is to even pursue art in itself with capitalist forces, competition, commercialism, class, or generally the influence art has on its creators and audiences of all genders and ages. one thing i noted was also how it touches on the individualism that is demanded, if not coming naturally, in order to survive in the creative trenches lol
whilst this would have been a five star if there were no men (i don’t even say this to be funny, i genuinely thought their point of views were rather unnecessary and contributed nothing very substantial, louisa and karina is a love story for the ages and i stand by that!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Infidelity, Mental illness, Homophobia, Suicidal thoughts, Sexual assault, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Alcoholism, Death of parent, Domestic abuse, Drug use, Racism, and Rape
Minor: Suicide