Reviews

What Belongs to You by Garth Greenwell

shortsmarts's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

2.75

bren17's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

kkdelrey's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

6/5

creiland17's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional sad fast-paced

3.5

silver_lining_in_a_book's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

 
Love isn’t just a matter of looking at someone, I think now, but also of looking with them, of facing what they face.

Gorgeous writing, but was not the right time for me to read this. I will be updating my thoughts following a reread in the future. 

alicja_p's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

peewee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced

5.0

anesal's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

Intrigued by the first part. 
Really liked the second one. 
The third one was meh. 
Overall an interesting read with beautiful writing.

andrea59's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Esta novela se lleva, para mí, tres estrellas más por donde está ambientado que por la historia en sí.

Hablando de esta última, debo decir que entiendo y a la vez no entiendo porque a la gente le gusta tanto. Es realista. Pero a mí me resultó... ¿Apática? Me cuesta simpatizar con el alguien que paga para mantener relaciones sexuales, y más cuando es obvio que la persona a la que paga no parece disfrutar demasiado (por no decir nada) de su situación. ¿Que Mitko no era una buena persona y se aprovechaba de él? Vale, eso es verdad, pero no creo que nadie deba verse rebajado a vender su cuerpo por no tener otra forma de ganarse la vida. Esto no significa que odie al protagonista (cuyo nombre no conocemos), pero no empaticé demasiado con él, y me sentí frustrada con varias de las decisiones que tomó a lo largo de la historia, aunque encerraran cierta lógica.

Por otro lado, tampoco veo el por qué de tanto entusiasmo acerca del estilo narrativo. Lo leí en inglés, su idioma original, por lo que no puede decirse que perdiera nada en la traducción. Pero no lo entiendo. Es cierto que no soy una gran amante de la "prosa profunda", con elaboradas frases, pero a mí la prosa no me resultó especialmente bonita, me resultó especialmente liosa. No era tan horrible como mi odio incodicional hacia "Lolita", pero tampoco se acercaba, ni de lejos, al estilo de escritura de mi amado libro "La canción de Aquiles".

Sí me conmovió (a medias) el final, pero, aunque crudo como la vida misma, no hizo que la novela mejorase, solo la mantuvo al nivel del resto de las últimas diez o veinte páginas (que me gustaron, pero no encantaron).

Dicho esto, paso a hablar de lo que hace que la novela me resultase interesante de leer. ¡Está ambientada en Bulgaria! No hay muchas novelas que tengan como ambientación Europa del Este, y menos si el protagonista es un hombre extranjero y homosexual (lo cual, por otro lado, se entiende). Además, se parece taaaaanto a Rumanía: los edificios comunistas grises y viejos, los carros tirados por caballos de los gitanos, los trenes viejos, los perros callejeros (bastante violentos a veces), el mal funcionamiento de los servicios públicos... Sé que nada de esto suena bonito, pero la sensación de familiaridad es la sensación de familiaridad xD Obviamente, estas son las cosas que ve una persona extranjera en estos países, pero yo también soy extranjera en muchos sentidos, por lo que es agradable ver a alguien reflejando eso, aunque lo que se refleje no lo sea.

Me encantó también una frase, que traduciré muy libremente porque ni siquiera tengo la cita al lado y no la recuerdo del todo bien: "Todos aquellos con talento o medios, o ambos, se habían marchado hace mucho". Y los jóvenes que iban a la universidad de este profesor hablaban de Bulgaria como "un país muerto", un sentimiento que comparto para con Rumanía ._. El protagonista decía que todos estaban ansiosos por huir, y lo cierto es que me molestó que lo plantease así, ¿qué pasa, acaso no tienen derecho a marcharse de un lugar que acabaría con ellos? No creo que el autor lo dijese con mala intención, pero a veces, a los que somos hijos de extranjeros, nos preguntan si no queremos volver a los países de origen de nuestros padres. ¿Irías tú a un país como Nigeria, Afganistán o Albania para intentar mejorarlo? ¿No, verdad? ¿Por qué? Pues porque las condiciones de vida son lamentables, el acceso a servicios de calidad complicado y la integración cultural peliaguda (más en lugares tan conservadores como Europa del Este). Dicho esto, yo tampoco tengo la obligación de hacerlo, por mucha pena que me pueda dar que esos países estén así de mal. Si quisiera hacerlo, sería mi problema, pero no creo que sea algo de lo que deba hablarse como si debieramos algo a ningún país.

Dicho esto, si la historia no te interesa y la ambientación tampoco, no te recomiendo leer esta historia, pero si ves que alguna de las dos te atrae, tampoco resulta molesto acabarla (además, es cortita xD).

ndizz87's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Where to start....I got this novel because it had come with recommendations. After reading it, I think 3 out of 5 is being quite generous. The plot centers around an American teacher, the narrator, in Bulgaria looking for love in all the wrong places. These wrong places are where he meets Mitko, a jovial, extremely poor male prostitute operating out of dingy bathrooms. Their first encounter entices the narrator to continue seeing the younger man, who by all accounts, is only gay-for-pay. Throughout the novel they travel around Bulgaria being completely disappointed by one another until the spectre of death comes along. Fade to black.

Let’s first talk about the narrator who is wholly unsympathetic. This is a symptom of the larger issue with the novel as every single character in the novel is entirely unsympathetic. Not just that, but they’re all 100% pathetic. I don’t really like the narrator and there is nothing about him that makes me at least half heartedly attempt to like him. I also, by the end of the novel, don’t really feel like I knew him well enough. He puts himself in these situations and then laments about the situations he finds himself in. Really? The whole “A Grave” section nearly made me put the books down as the narrator talks, at length, about his relationship with his father that he just finds out is dying. Don’t get me wrong, the passages about the relationship with a red-haired boy was interesting. How they became physically close and then the red-haired boy makes him watch as he gets a blow job from a girl to prove his heterosexuality...piqued my interest. That gets destroyed when he starts talking about sexually suggestive things regarding his father and their showers together. I just really didn’t need that visual at all.

Mitko was probably the best fleshed out character, and yet I still felt completely distant from him. I wanted to know more and I wanted to get inside his perspective as it was clearly probably the superior perspective. However, I didn’t get that at all. And the language barrier, though understandable, kept me from having the closeness to Mitko that I wanted, and quite frankly needed.

The plot left a lot to be desired for such a thin novel. The two characters meet in a bathroom. Later, the narrator lets him come over to his place. After that they go to a seaside town and have a fight. They go without seeing each other for a long time (enter creepy Daddy issues). They reconnect after the narrator has a boyfriend and Mitko discovers he’s given the narrator syphilis. The narrator goes to a seaside town on a train with his mom. Creepy thoughts about a little boy being Mitko. Mitko comes back to say he’s dying. The end.

I won’t put much effort into reviewing this insubstantial novel. It was enough to take Greenwell’s follow up off my “to read” list. The characters were distant and unknowable, the plot was thin (like the novel itself), and I didn’t gleam much from it. It was a waste, but the upside was it was so thin it didn’t take up too much of my time.