Reviews

The Hound of the Baskervilles - Anjing Setan by Arthur Conan Doyle

bouvabird's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

catburglar_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

2.75

i didn’t like this as much as the others as i felt with the edition i listened to it was all over the place. there was a lot of context that was either missing or went over my head. its maybe my fault for listening to the sherlock audiobooks exclusively when i go to the gym but i didn’t have that problem with the other 2

the atmosphere was cool and it seems like my sort of thing. i will come back to this in the future when i read it physically. 

d0nkatsu's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative mysterious

5.0

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Fear appeal has never worked with me; so I think I was never going to be a good judge for a story like that. There are a couple of awesome moments (specially the thing with cab driver said) but the plot was predictable. I could actually guess the identity of the villain among a couple of other things. This is low by Doyle's own standards - because normally, when reading him; I'm as clueless as Watson.

brokendesklamp's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

sarune's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

3.0

marquettelaree's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

nelo7's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

5.0

roisin_marie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated

4.25

willjacks's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The prose was more enjoyable than anticipated, but I think this style of novel isn’t my cup of tea (mysteries).

I appreciate the influence it had on the world, the millions of fans and hundreds of adaptations over numerous decades, but to me it felt like a literary equivalent of a children’s shape-sorting box. After a few chapters of square blocks not fitting into round holes, we eventually get all the blocks into the box and… it ends. Wahoo.

Doyle seemed to be petrified of plot holes. They are his hound on the moor.