4.06 AVERAGE

adventurous mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
adventurous challenging dark mysterious sad tense fast-paced
hopeful informative mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I really struggled with the Davian chapters. not sure if I'll continue.
adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful mysterious sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Fate.
adventurous dark mysterious

Don't get me wrong... I know The Will of the Many is a better written book from a technical standpoint. I accept that. This was a much more interesting story. 

There are plenty of times when you can tell this is a new writer and a first published book -- repetitive descriptions, clunky time/location jumps, McGuffins (plural) -- but I was interested in the characters from the beginning, and it was really easy to convince myself I should just read one* more chapter.  (* "one more" rarely meant only one more)

(I will say that I thought John Gwynne's Malice was better in almost all phases with fairly similar plot points.)