2.61k reviews for:

The Godfather

Mario Puzo

4.25 AVERAGE


Esse livro oh *chef's kiss
adventurous dark emotional informative mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

loved everything except for the weird plot with lucy mancini in the middle of the book and the racism

The Godfather story is insurmountable, it is beyond a classic, it is unashamedly ignorant of cultural, geographical or age boundaries – it resonates with all of us and has so ever since it first appeared in print in Mario Puzo‘s epic novel in 1969.

Nino Rota‘s world famous main theme song is etched in the depth of my memory from my childhood days when the music filled my grandparents’ house in Iran. My grandfather loved the movie and music and from that tender memory, the Godfather has held a special place in my heart all my life. I knew the music many years before I watched the movie first, and that came a decade or so before I read the novel.

Now, and only now, after reading the novel do I understand why he loved this story so much and why he repeatedly watched and listened to the music. Now I feel closer to my grandfather and marvel at his taste in what I find to be a remarkable story. How I wish he could be here today to tell me his thoughts on the Godfather, now that I can appreciate it. We may express the gratitude we feel toward our families while we have the chance, but why is it that the true understanding of that gratitude often greets us bitterly late in life?

The ingenuous story and remarkable characters aside, the writing of Mario Puzo is of highest quality. Puzo’s novel speaks to every reader from every walk of life, and evidently through different generations. It runs through themes understood by all humans: family and brotherhood, sacrifice and justice, trust and betrayal, revenge and retribution, business and friendship – friendship that the Godfather held so tenderly and seriously, friendship that he offered openly and generously, friendship in the name of which he offered favors and collected them in due time. In the core of this magnificent story is Mario Puzo’s writing.

On the surface, it mostly appears to be a crime novel with grotesque scenes and unhappy outcomes but it is only the surface. The writing is solid, authentic, lustful and obsessive through and through – it takes your imagination into the scene, it places you inside the situation with the character and it demands that you fully partake in the intensity of every moment. The story endures and the writing of this remarkable author is the solid foundation of support which upholds it.

“Amerigo Bonasera sat in New York Court Number 3 and waited for justice….” And so we enter the under world of Italian immigrants in New York city. We encounter characters we can never forget. The depiction of these unforgettable characters – Luca Brasi, Tom Hagen, Sonny Corleone, Kay Adams, Johnny Fontaine – while secondary to our main characters, paints a permanent picture before our eyes in the hands of Mario Puzo’s masterful prose. Through these characters, we get to know our heroes, Don Vito Corleone as the head of the Corleone family and business, and the mastermind of the ingenious mafia world, and Michael Corleone, the Don’s favorite son, who refuses to follow in his father’s footsteps, joins the army and keeps a distance from the family, until one day in the deep countryside of Sicily, he meets his ultimate fate.

Perhaps, in its essence, in its very core, the Godfather is a story about father and son and their undeniable bond, which can be weakened but not broken, in the company of family loyalty and devotion reciprocating that of the Corleone family.

“I will reason with him.” – Don Corleone’s famous motto, a phrase that, when used, immediately translated to Tom Hagen, his consigliere, that the Godfather will not be persuaded otherwise, and that it would be in the best interest of the opposing party to acquiesce to Godfather’s terms because no matter what terms presented to them at this time, if they should fail to agree, it would most certainly be subject to harsher circumstances.

Some of the sub-plots running through the Godfather, non-central to the overall theme and missing from the movie, still make up my most cherished parts of this genius story. The indelible, lustful, raw passion which Lucy Mancini and Sonny enjoy for a short while is on top of that list. Even the sweet brief romance of Michael Corleone and his first wife, the Italian bella Apollonia, deliciously described as it was, pales in comparison to the passages imparting the details of Sonny’s wild affair with Lucy. Mario Puzo proves no less a gifted author in his creation of the erotic love scenes between the impassioned lovers. The love making is predatory as Lucy and Sonny devour one another with voracious appetite.

When Sonny dies, Lucy’s whole physical being aches for him, a loss and a wound that Sonny’s wife is far from experiencing. With the move to Vegas, thanks to Hagan’s arrangements to take care of “extended” relations of Sonny, Lucy embarks on a new life and adventures, including the nature of her relationship with Jules. Large or small, Puzo takes the time to first develop his characters fully – even if in isolation of others – and then to carefully weave each into the central plot. There is a reason and time for each character to play their part, pay their dues, return a favor, or bestow an act of friendship to the Godfather.

The Don, the mastermind of Mario Puzo’s creation, is the only one who knows well in advance of others – and that includes the reader – how and when each chosen one will be called to action.

The Godfather is a masterpiece and a classic, and a story that once read and consumed, leaves its readers and viewers changed permanently.

Read this for an Introduction to Criminology class many years ago. I finally saw the movie a couple of months ago. I'm probably being biased here, as I know most people prefer the movie, but I enjoyed the book more. I couldn't put it down and couldn't wait to talk about it in class. A lot of people prefer the movie because it steamlined the story a bit better and took out parts that weren't really relevant, such as a character undergoing corrective surgery on her reproductive organs. I totally understand that argument, and I wouldn't want those extra parts in the movie, but I actually found them really interesting while reading the book. I hope that doesn't make me too strange.
dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
dark emotional tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Prefacing by stating I haven’t seen the movie. My only prior knowledge was some Family Guy bits about it. 

I really liked the overall story within the Mafia families, but I felt like some characters got far more development than others. That ruined it for me, especially when they’re connected to main characters. The writing was also rushed in some parts (such as Apollonia’s death). 

I did really enjoy the ending, especially the parallels between Kay and Carmela. I just wish they had more interactions in order to mirror Michael and Vito, not two or three short conversations about Catholicism. A lot of characters also felt pointless in the end - Johnny Fontane is quite literally a b plot to the main story. I keep forgetting he was in the book, and I don’t mean that as him being a bad character, but rather I think his story would’ve been suitable in a spinoff novel.

جالب‌تر از همه در خواندن این کتاب برای من، مقایسه‌اش با فیلم بود. اقتباسی بسیار خوب را می‌دیدم که علاوه بر وفاداری بسیار زیاد به رمان، در مواردی هم خلاقیت‌های سینمایی قابل توجهی به کار برده شده بود. اما اگر کسی می‌بودم که رمان را ابتدا خوانده و سپس فیلم را دیده بودم (بنا به سنت معروف) احتمالاً قدری سرخورده می‌شدم چون رمان عمیق‌تر و باورپذیرتر، دقیق‌تر و قابل‌قبول‌تر است. در این میان، چیزی که به نظرم به شدت در فیلم از قلم افتاده که ضربه‌ی قابل توجهی را به آن زده است، تقریباً حذف نقش مادر در فیلم است که به زعم من یک خطای بزرگ از جانت کوپولا و پوزو در نوشتن فیلم‌نامه بوده است. نمی‌دانم چرا این خطا را کرده‌اند. علتش هر چه بوده با کم‌رنگ شدن مادر تا مرز حذف شدنش از فیلم، یک بخش معنایی از بافت مافیا (خانواده) به شدت ضربه خورده است.

از نکات مرتبط به خود داستان که بگذریم، به ترجمه و ویراستاری آن می‌رسیم. گرچه متن را با انگلیسی تطبیق نداده‌ام اما به نظرم ترجمه‌ی قابل اعتمادی می‌رسد و فارسی نسبتاً روانی دارد. اما ویراستاری آن وحشتناک است. نمونه‌ی شاهکارش صفحه‌ی ۵۴۰ خ ۳ و۴ است که نوشته شده: «کل اقتصاد بنا شده بر آبی را که طی صدها سال با زحمت ساخته شده بود، را بر باد می‌داد» یعنی دو نشانه‌ی مفعولی برای یک مفعول! باز هم هست...
adventurous dark tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

An unlikely book for me to choose, I loved The Godfather. The many characters were fabulous and the writing was done in a way I could really get into the mind set of something I disagree with which is always a fun trip.
dark emotional funny tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes