thisisgabe's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

fishreadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

mandooh's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

_elisebeth's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

It was alright. Still not as good as I expected

cattytrona's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Really impressed by what a coherent and interesting collection this is. I didn’t have high hopes given at how obviously this is just making the most of the Jekyll and Hyde name and Stevenson being copyright free to make a quick book/buck, but I really enjoyed the selection of stories. They fitted together really well, even Weir of Hermiston, which is the obvious outlier given it’s not in anyway supernatural, but still has that interest in criminality and justice. And maybe that’s due to Stevenson’s interest in those themes, and the strength of the collection is because the guy can write, but it works.

I picked this up because I wanted to reread the titular story, but I actually really enjoyed getting to read more of Stevenson’s short fiction. Jekyll and Hyde is good fun — it’s got a lot of similarities with Dracula, now I’m returning to it, with the different voices (Stevenson’s so good at this, at tone of narration/narrator) and the slowly unfolding mystery. The story absolutely suffers because of its cultural weight: it would be a joy to read this and not know what’s up with Jekyll and Hyde. But unfortunately, we live in the world.

The Bodysnatchers is an interesting little tale — and I enjoyed it and Weir of Hermiston all the more for being an Edinburgh resident. There’s something very modern about the way it inserts its characters into a real (true?) crime. Of course, Burke and Hare are more character than anything else, really, but still.

The Bottle Imp is actually a great fable, and my first time getting to read anything reflecting Stevenson’s time in Polynesia (well, except Treasure Island, but that’s still about British people). I feel like his travels is not a thing people tend to know about him, nor is it highlighted in the writings people talk about, so it was a nice surprise to find it here. 

Markheim was probably my least favourite of the bunch, but felt like a very classic  Victorian spooky story - very fireside appropriate for this time of year. Plus it thematically fitted in really nicely.

As mentioned, Weir of Hermiston is the outlier, and the fact it’s incomplete is pretty frustrating — especially given the book is essentially selling itself as a short story collection. It came as a bit of a shock, and I ended up putting in a bunch of Wikipedia time just to work out what was up with this random half-novel. Having said that, I really liked it. I’ve been kind of rotten at regularly reading anything much before 1930 this year, and it was a nice reminder of how much I actually rate nineteenth century novels, in all their density. And Stevenson is a pretty adept renderer of Scots, too. It’s still a little weird that it’s in here, taking up so much (the most) of the book, but I’ve read it now, and it’s done me no harm. Good collection; good writer. 

adrianzm's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Of all the stories in the book, there were very few I liked; Jekyll and Hyde, Merry Men and Markheim being those few. There isn't really anything remarkable about the stories, some are strange, and some are just detailing the lives of people. I can't fully understand why so much of it bored me, whether it was the language or the subject matter, probably a mix of both.

endless_waffle's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

silviasbookreviews's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

La trama gira en torno al misterioso amigo del respetado Doctor Jekyll: el señor Hyde. Todo aquel que tiene la desgracia de encontrarse con el violento y desagradable señor Hyde, acaba sintiendo una especie de repulsión natural hacia él. Siempre creando problemas de los que luego el honorable Doctor Jekyll se acaba haciendo cargo, lleva a que el narrador de esta historia e íntimo amigo del Doctor, el abogado Utterson, investigue la extraña relación que une a estos dos hombres tan opuestos. Es una novella que se lee muy rápido y que enseguida te atrapa. Ansioso por querer saber más y más sobre el motivo de la extraña protección del Doctor de tan horrible personaje, te acabas devorando el libro en santiamén.

La concepción que tenía de la historia era completamente distinta a lo que en realidad es, pensé que iba a estar más centrada en los crímenes cometidos por el señor Hyde. Aún así, tampoco he quedado decepcionada, he disfrutado mucho de la lectura y, a pesar de conocer ya la naturaleza de la relación entre los dos personajes por ser este un relato bastante popular, sentía curiosidad por saber cómo se iba a desvelar el misterio. Es una novella que, cuánto más la hemos analizado y trabajado en clase, más me ha gustado

oliviasimmonds's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde only covered 20% of the book, the rest was the other stories. Sadly I hated the other stories, they seemed to be forgettable and often difficult to understand. I think it took a long time for me to read this as I really didn't want to pick it up again. I would like to read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde again to see if my rating were biased because of the other stories. Overall not an enjoyable collection of stories for light reading.




novel_ideas's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0