Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.71 AVERAGE
3.71 AVERAGE
This book was very long. I read it for a book club so I was kind of rushed. During most of the reading I didn't like the book very much. However when I read the ending of the book I loved it and it was by far my favorite part of the book. So over all I would give the book three and a half stars. However for the ending I would give it four and a half.
adventurous
challenging
emotional
funny
inspiring
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
Loveable characters:
Yes
Perfect book to read on the Camino tbh! Little adventures while I'm on my little adventure. First modern novel, first metafiction, first #ownvoices autistic protagonist. Why did finishing it make me so sad?
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
Why did no one tell me this book is hilarious? I can't believe it took me so long to finally pick it up.
[b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842] is densest in the early chapters, which are packed full of footnotes that should be read for full context. I highly recommend using two bookmarks-- one for your place in the story and one for in the notes. If this seems too much like hard work, I want to reassure you that the notes become less frequent as you progress through the book, but they add some very helpful background information in the beginning.
If you don't know what it's about, [b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842] follows the titular character and his lovable squire, Sancho Panza, as the former declares himself a knight-errant and goes looking for noble adventures. The context is important here because, at the time of the novel, chivalry romances like [b:Amadis De Gaula|86244|Amadis De Gaula (Odres Nuevos)|Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1347396304s/86244.jpg|13514589] had become so popular in Spain that monarchs of the time feared the influence of them on the impressionable minds of young people.
[a:Cervantes|4037220|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1276109217p2/4037220.jpg] responded by writing a parody of these knightly adventures. [b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842] has read so many of these books that they have had a profound effect on his mental state. He gets caught up in a fictional world created by his imagination and truly believes that not only is he a knight, but the inns he encounters are castles, the prostitutes are princesses, and the windmills are... giants. This latter is, apparently, an iconic moment in the novel and I can definitely see why-- it is so funny. I read it through about five times and laughed each time. I think it's the way I hear Sancho saying "What giants?" in my mind that cracks me up.
The adventures do feel repetitive at times, and I don't feel like either Part 1 or Part 2 needed to be as long as it was. The buffoonish squabbles get old after a while. However, I really enjoyed the switch to a more meta style in the second part, which the notes will tell you was published some ten years after the first. In this, [a:Cervantes|4037220|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1276109217p2/4037220.jpg] explores the idea of characters knowing they were being written about, and the book takes a more philosophical - and arguably darker - turn.
I read some critical interpretations alongside the book, and I found [a:Edith Grossman|2599|Edith Grossman|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1321519146p2/2599.jpg]'s especially interesting. She says she saw [b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842] as a terribly depressing book. [a:Nabokov|5152|Vladimir Nabokov|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1482502806p2/5152.jpg], too, called it "cruel and crude" (that's the guy who wrote about the stalking and raping of a child). And though there are many moments of humour, I don't disagree with them. There is something undeniably sad about this book, too.
Maybe it is sad because this man is so deluded, so wrapped up in fictions. Maybe it is the way he allows himself to be deceived, and the ways others take advantage of this chance at deception. But I think, personally, that it is sad because none of it is real. [b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842] wants something admirable, to do good, defend the weak and defeat the bad guys, but it is all in his naive imagination.
I don't know what was truly intended by the ending but, unlike some, I don't see it as a final victory. Instead I see it as a sad loss of something important. Either way, I am glad to have finally read this book. We can argue about interpretations, but [b:Don Quixote|3836|Don Quixote|Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1546112331s/3836.jpg|121842]'s impact on western literature cannot be overstated.
Blog | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Youtube
One of the best novels ever written. Had me laughing out loud so often.
Reading the history of this book makes it even more fascinating, it was the first 'modern novel', by the fact that the characters develop over time and change as people. Just a wonderful, timeless book.
Reading the history of this book makes it even more fascinating, it was the first 'modern novel', by the fact that the characters develop over time and change as people. Just a wonderful, timeless book.
adventurous
funny
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
An incredibly slow book. Not worth reading. Interesting idea, interesting characters, fascinating that it was written 400 years ago. Some amusing anecdotes, but an incredible amount of unnecessary dialogue and filler. A modern rewrite with careful editing would be amazing.
This book took me 10x longer to read than any other book I've ever attempted, and has put me off 'classics' for a time.
'Part 2' is significantly better than the first half of the book. I read the 'Edith Grossman' translation.
This book took me 10x longer to read than any other book I've ever attempted, and has put me off 'classics' for a time.
'Part 2' is significantly better than the first half of the book. I read the 'Edith Grossman' translation.
adventurous
funny
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence
My favorite book of all time. The first and best novel ever written. F the haterz