Reviews

A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle

d0nkatsu's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious

5.0

nightwillowfox's review

Go to review page

3.0

I would give it a 3.5 stars if I could. I didn't mind the first part of the story but when it came to part 2 for the most part I just found it boring and like i was reading another book. that is why for me I am on'y giving it a 3.5 stars.

sidharthvardhan's review

Go to review page

4.0

“It's quite exciting," said Sherlock Holmes, with a yawn.”

“There are fifty who can reason synthetically for one who can reason analytically.”

“It is a mistake to confound strangeness with mystery.”

“When a man writes on a wall, his instinct leads him to write above the level of his own eyes.”


Awesome, really awesome - it had to be, for it brought forth one of the best fictional characters of all time in Sherlock Holmes. It is beautiful how Watson paints you picture of Holmes' nature. I would have given full stars but the story of criminal given in second part is bit boring making me take that last star.

ruthiethepage's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

5.0

andrewtungate's review

Go to review page

adventurous informative lighthearted mysterious medium-paced

4.0

bia_reicht's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

georgias7's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious

3.0

noriam_reads's review

Go to review page

5.0

I Don't know why I've waited this long to read it

kerrianne10's review

Go to review page

mysterious reflective relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

illusie's review

Go to review page

2.0

This book wasn't more me. I thought Sherlock was a smart but strange man. I liked the first part, but thought the second part was weird. It felt like a totally different story. Some parts of the book were very boring. I won't be continuing the series.