Reviews tagging 'Ableism'

My Darling Duke by Stacy Reid

15 reviews

turnthepages_nl's review against another edition

Go to review page

De disability rep stond me enorm tegen. Het zwabbert alle kanten op.
Ik heb de laatste hoofdstukken even gelezen en mijn vermoedens werden bevestigd...
ze hebben PIV seks, hij kan een stijve krijgen én klaarkomen. Ookal werd eerder brweerd dat hij dat niet kon na zijn ongeluk. En Katherine raakt zelfs zwanger. *zucht*



Maar waar ik vooral op afknapte is de scene dat de koets in het water reed en de hertog haar, zijn personeel én de paarden uit het water wist te halen. Terwijl hij chronische pijn en stijfheid heeft in zijn bene  en net een heel aantal uur heeft paardgereden dus zijn lichaam al bekaf is.
Vervolgens tilt hij de man op zijn schouders en loopt zo het bos in. Terwijl hij meestal met een stok moet lopen...
Dit was allemaal zo onrealistisch en gemakkelijk. Daarna even kort noemen dat hij pijn heeft en verder niks?! Nee sorry dan knap ik echt af. Heel jammer dit.



Expand filter menu Content Warnings

boundbyemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

“I would lay the world at your feet if I could, Katherine.”
“I do not need the whole world. Just a little bit of you, Alexander,”

The angst in this one was so good — the disability rep was written well but the pacing of this book was what stopped it from being really good.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

readingsugar's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maeverose's review against another edition

Go to review page

Despite the interesting plot, this could not keep my attention. It was very slow and repetitive. Every time Kitty and Alexander interact they have the same thoughts about each other over and over: Kitty is horny for him but convinces herself she isn’t, Alexander is bewildered by how unique and unlike other girls Kitty is.

I feel unsure about the disability rep. As far as I read (39%) there was nothing outright offensive, but some things gave me pause. I am disabled but not in the way that Alexander is so I’m no authority on this, but it annoyed me somewhat that (even though I know plenty of wheelchair users can walk) he seemed to be able to do pretty much anything an able bodied person could (walk almost whenever he wanted, dance,
swim in rushing water to rescue two people plus horses
), even if it was always clearly accompanied by pain. I’m not sure how I feel about that. I don’t want to discredit his pain, but it feels like his disability was at least partially written away when convenient. He was described as having muscular legs despite supposedly needing a wheelchair for the past seven years (though considering he seems to rarely use it, maybe that does make sense). It feels like he was written to be ‘palatably disabled’. He’s very stubborn about not using the wheelchair despite how it would help him and I assume that is addressed later in the book, but I never got that far.

There was one scene in particular that bothered me as well. (Mild spoilers) In chapter seven after the dance when Kitty goes to find him on the bench, instead of strictly being concerned for him, Kitty’s mostly thinking about how sweet he was to endure the pain to dance with her, how attractive he is, how her reputation could be affected if anyone found them alone, and how ‘admirable’ he is for being able to hide his pain so well (why is that admirable? Hiding his pain to ‘appear normal’? He shouldn’t have to grin and bear it). I felt like that scene would’ve been great if she had just wanted to make sure he was okay, then helped him, then they had the romantic moment. Rather than her clearly seeing him in pain and distress but being horny for him in that moment. It felt so off.

Also, in the book it says the left side of his face/body is scarred, but on the front cover it isn’t at all…. 🤨

I don’t know if any of these things are corrected later in the book, they could be, but it’s not holding my attention enough to read the rest of it to find out.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chrisljm's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional relaxing fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emilyharmonica's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional relaxing sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

 “You are the only person I’ve ever wanted to share my silence.”

There’s little I love more than a quality Beauty and the Beast retelling, and this one was just… *swoon*

In a desperate attempt to save her family from poverty, Katherine Danvers announces her engagement to Alexander Masters, Duke of Thornton, a man she has never met and who hasn’t been seen in society circles for nearly a decade. The duke, meanwhile, has shut himself away in his Scotland estate after a tragic accident left him brutally scarred and confined to a wheelchair. When he gets wind of rumors that a young lady has announced their engagement to the society pages, he travels to London to get to the bottom of her deception. And the rest, as they say, is history.

I’m a sucker for stories where the love interests find healing and redemption in one another. I loved how self-aware these characters were, how honest they were with themselves and each other in spite of their stubborn resistance to their chemistry. The strongest moments of the book were in the protagonists’ quiet moments together, sharing bites of an apple alone in an abandoned cottage, or spending time in the Duke’s library, or admiring the Scottish countryside from high up in a tree. It’s not the spiciest romance novel out there, but the sexual tension and romantic angst were off the charts.

I’d recommend this book to all readers of historical romance, as well as any reader who enjoys leaning into a tad bit of melodrama. I’m looking forward to reading more books in this series, as well as others from Stacy Reid’s backlist!

Bonus quote just because:

“You make me hope,” he snarled low and dangerous. “Like a goddamn idiot, you make me pray, you make my throat burn with the need to scream and beg God to give you to me, to treasure, to worship…to love until the end of my days.” He had to close his eyes to control his ragged breathing.

Overall rating: 4/5
Spice level: 2/5

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cup_of_rosie's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

It was a good easy read, i wished there would be more though as I usually do with these types of books. It was a very good retelling of beauty and the beast, and I enjoyed their romance and the disability representation. Overall good read.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

iisa's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kim03's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

My thoughts.
Positive:
  • Truly adored the writing style.
  • The characters. Even side characters were well fleshed out and felt like their own people instead of just a means to an end for the plot and main characters.
  • The portrayal of chronic illness. Also the insecurities that come with it.
  • The development of the relationship. Well paced, though I wasn't quite d'accord with everything. (Meaning I would've made different choices)

Negative:
  • What in the everliving shit was the main man thinking. I do not support a lot of his choices.
    The things he said in anger were inexcusable for me and the fact that the main woman's friends encouraged her to go back to him??? She deserves better (was my opinion after he behaved like the typical proud douchebag). Still happy for their happy end tho.
  • His pride (and that is what I identify this as) was my main problem. It stops him from true intimacy, from trusting her and himself, and though I can understand the origin of his insecurities, I still find his reactions... Questionable.
    Case in point: why would anyone insult the woman they love? That made it so hard for me to believe that he actually loved her. This was me during the Fallout scene: 🤨

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

the_vegan_bookworm's review

Go to review page

lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.75

I found the text to be overly wordy and flowery, which made it tough to get through. The plot was also very reminiscent to "The Duchess Deal" by Tessa Dare, though this book was less polished and the plot was much slower. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings