Reviews

Crooked Kingdom by Leigh Bardugo

cynthia21's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It’s hard to articulate why I didn’t rate this higher, but it was a drag to read in the middle and the multiple POVs became tedious. I almost quit around 33%. I started to enjoy it again around 65%.

Overall I’m glad I finished it because the resolution was satisfying. I love this duology for Kaz’s ridiculously genius schemes, and his brain carries the plot across the finish line.

The middle was a struggle because I could not care less about the character development for the side characters. There’s so many schemes building up to the final scheme, but it was excessive. She could’ve cut out some filler scenes.

3 stars because each plot point on its own is a banger, but somehow when it’s all strung together, it was laborious to keep reading.

I really wanted to like it, but I needed more Kaz and Inej, especially more Kaz. He’s the star of the show.

kassibaby84's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This book was good, but I preferred the first book in the series. I loved the budding romances between the characters in SOC. Kaz and Inej are so broken, they make each other whole. Jesper and Wylan are adorable. But I think Bardugo did wrong by Matthias. His death was too abrupt and unnecessary in my mind. I felt for Nina having suffered so much, growing her abilities, only to have Matthias get taken out. While I found it hard to believe that this group of ragtag teenagers could best a group of hardened older men, I still loved their strength as a group.

While I LOVED the characters in SOC, I actually preferred the plot in Shadow & Bone. For a long time, I've heard people rave about how much better the Six of Crows duology is than Shadow & Bone. But this book felt slow compared to the heists in the first, a lot of plotting and introspection. I wanted the action to be drawn out. I kept putting the book down and not feeling drawn to picking it back up. It was frustrating that they kept plotting to have everything go wrong then plotting some more then failing over and over again. Kaz felt a little too bullet-proof to me. He kept He reminded me of Aelin in Throne of Glass, planning things behind people's backs, but at least Aelin frequently paid the price.

This was a good book, but Ninth House is my favorite Bardugo book by far!

rb8985's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

ilomilona's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Joo lukeminen ja arvostelun kirjoittaminen venähti taas vähän. Tää kirja <333. En nyt selitä tarkemmin, samat jutut kuin SoC arvostelussakin. MUTTA tää loppu... tiesin mitä sieltä tulee ja just siks en halunnut lukee. Emotional damage. Tällä kertaa oli oikeesti yks mun lemppareista. En pysty tarpeeks korostamaan miten paljon rakastan tätä kirjaa/kirjasarjaa. Siis nää hahmot tuntu liian todellisilta

kotsemela's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous tense
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

i want to be a crow in my next life

zara93's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I’m about to rant, you have been warned.

I have some issues with this one.. i’m not saying it’s bad (3 stars is still pretty good) but I didn’t feel like it blew me away! Some parts of it were 5 stars worthy but some other parts were just .. fine I guess.

Ok, so one of my main issues with this book is that I didn’t buy half of it.. bear with me while I explain. First of all, the characters were inconsistent.. they are supposed to be this gang of the worst individuals the barrel can offer, especially our boy Dirtyhands. Kaz is supposed to be deadly, ruthless and blinded by revenge. And we saw him in action and we believed it in Six of Crows. Here he was kinda... soft? Like come on, you promised me ruthless so give ruthless!!

In this book he was all talk unlike in Six of Crows. Ok I get that he’s a bit changed, just like how Inej noticed some of his actions were unusual, like preparing a net for her etc. But that’s Inej, it’s understandable that he is acting differently towards her, doesn’t explain why he’s not so “dirtyhands”. You know how in The Folk of the Air trilogy we are told that Cardan is a cruel prince and boy did he deliver! Don’t tell me a character is supposed to be something and they are not, he kept telling Inej that he’s not a good guy but the author made sure he isn’t that bad either as if she was worried we are not going to root for him if he was “that bad”. He was so set on revenge, it was his sole purpose.. but it didn’t feel like it paid off.

Which brings me to the whole ya thing, it always comes back to the ages. This feels like when a production company decides to make a movie about let’s say Joker, but they insist on making it PG. It’s not going to work. Just imagine if these characters were older, if these two books were more gruesome. It was already quite dark why not go all the way? I think it was a bit of a wasted opportunity tbh.

With that said, Kaz still is my favourite character and I wish his part was bigger.. his relationship with Inej was so interesting, both of them are very interesting characters with so many scars and so much to explore and I hoped we got more time with them. It felt like Leigh Bardugo deliberately spaced out their POVs, especially Kaz’s. I think she intended for him to keep part of his mysterious side but to me It didn’t work. I just needed more Kaz!!

Nina and Matthias’s story was basically resolved in the beginning of the book and not much was happening with them, until Matthias dies and it’s a big deal.. I was actually surprised because few chapters back I was actually thinking that it didn’t feel like there are real stakes, they are all going to survive, I actually said that and then he died! It was a HUGE deal, so why was it just brushed off!! We should’ve spent more time on this, it should’ve been way more emotional. One minute Nina was grieving(?) and the next she was back to her usual self casually chatting with the rest of them! He’s the love of her life!!! Am I the only one who feels this way?

I know there is going to be a third book down the line, and the author is setting up for it.. but I didn’t like the way she went about it. You can set for a another book but don’t let that affect this one.

My second main issue with this book is the ending of the big conflict, not the ending itself, but the way she resolved the big climax. Similarly to the first book, it was so cartoonish and so left field. In Six of Crows it was the thing with the tank.. just no. And here it was the last bit in the church with Van Eak acting like a child rather than a believable villain.

My final issue is the size of the book, to be honest I think it could’ve been shorter. The author spent too much time going into details of the plans they made but it was so obvious that it wasn’t going to work the way these characters were hoping. So it kinda grew old every time they made a new plan.

I know it looks like I tore this book to shreds lol but I did enjoyed a big chunk of it, but I just can’t ignore these issues I had with it. I think i’m in the minority because I enjoyed Six of Crows way more than Crooked Kingdom.

j3ssica_susan's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I so wanted to love this. But it just felt a little repetitive, and the core storyline got lost. In the beginning, you think it's going to be about one threat, but they sort of disappear halfway through and are not mentioned again? It felt incomplete at the least, which is disappointing considering at this stage it is a duology.

christi12's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous tense medium-paced

4.25

andreahernaiz's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

rachparki's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0