Scan barcode
nikkixiuling's review against another edition
2.0
The premise of the story was good. I felt like the words/commentaries that were made did not strike a chord with me or maybe they were too sophisticated for me.
Its written in a way where I felt like I was observing people who were observing people and so I always felt somewhat removed from those characters. So as the high rise society began to break down, I couldn't quite get into it. Like damn Daniel why do you need reduce yourself to this animalistic nature, go get some food from the shops, we know you have the money.
Like the Snickers chocolate bar slogan goes: You're not you when you're hungry.
Its written in a way where I felt like I was observing people who were observing people and so I always felt somewhat removed from those characters. So as the high rise society began to break down, I couldn't quite get into it. Like damn Daniel why do you need reduce yourself to this animalistic nature, go get some food from the shops, we know you have the money.
Like the Snickers chocolate bar slogan goes: You're not you when you're hungry.
petaq's review against another edition
dark
What are you doing living on the 20th floor. Our monkey ancestors did not climb down from the trees for you to live on the 20th floor. The trees they lived in never got higher than the 4th floor anyways. Now you are feasting on dog meat and your necklace is composed of scavenged human teeth from your neighbour's living room. Should I be surprised. NO. You lived on the 20th floor.
(Wowowowww the high-rise is like the internet* MAN... We love a book about social isolation and class stratification in the context of structures that ostensibly put us closer together! )
*I know the internet as it is didnt exist as it does now when Ballard wrote this nor am I making an argument about him predicting a bunch of stuff. but. it appears. things do be the way they be
(Wowowowww the high-rise is like the internet* MAN... We love a book about social isolation and class stratification in the context of structures that ostensibly put us closer together! )
*I know the internet as it is didnt exist as it does now when Ballard wrote this nor am I making an argument about him predicting a bunch of stuff. but. it appears. things do be the way they be
charlie_bevis's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
funny
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
4.25
matthewptaylor's review against another edition
challenging
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
tomstbr's review
2.0
DNF. I'll probably keep listening to it, but just want to mark it as finished at the halfway mark because...
I did not like it. Extremely contrived. Ballard inserts himself very clearly here. He is opposed to urbanisation, and makes much commentary on social norms around work and class. Blah blah. Could have been an interesting concept but he focused too much on the needless details.
Actually, thinking about it, this is similar to Ian McDonald's Luna:
- Contrived encapsulation of humanity.
- Needless detail and excessive verbosity.
- People immediately resorting to violence.
- Unlikeable characters who do ridiculous things.
The only difference is that Ballard forces the book to look at themes, while McDonald just writes a 'what if?' story.
I honestly think that Dredd is a more realistic vision of futuristic high rise life.
I did not like it. Extremely contrived. Ballard inserts himself very clearly here. He is opposed to urbanisation, and makes much commentary on social norms around work and class. Blah blah. Could have been an interesting concept but he focused too much on the needless details.
Actually, thinking about it, this is similar to Ian McDonald's Luna:
- Contrived encapsulation of humanity.
- Needless detail and excessive verbosity.
- People immediately resorting to violence.
- Unlikeable characters who do ridiculous things.
The only difference is that Ballard forces the book to look at themes, while McDonald just writes a 'what if?' story.
I honestly think that Dredd is a more realistic vision of futuristic high rise life.
carmenthecowboy's review against another edition
2.0
definitely not what i expected! it was a lot more gory and sexual when i thought it would be more of a psychological thriller
bigenk's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
High-Rise is an analysis of complete social collapse within a self-contained and advanced luxury apartment complex. The strata of floors separate the tenets into three classes, yet all are wealthy enough to afford an apartment in the first place. The novel splits it's time between three different perspectives, one for each class. High-Rise begins with the last apartment being filled, as nearly everybody in the building is partying. Already there is friction between individuals, but it's minor, hardly something out of the ordinary in everyday life. The intensity of this friction ramps up over the chapters, as it seems to the characters that everybody is just waiting for an excuse, waiting for a mistake, to unleash their pent up id.
Ballard paints the scene of the tower so vividly; the slowly crumbling infrastructure and services that incite stress, and then the subsequent piles of refuse in the hallways, ubiquitous crass graffiti on the walls, makeshift furniture blockades in stairwells, entire floors completely devoid of electricity and running water. The tenets can leave the ever growing hellhole, but they begin to choose not to, choosing instead to wallow in their own filth and decay. I can picture it clearly because Ballard spends so much time detailing it. Yet I also think that he repeats the same examples a bit too frequently. I wish that he had been less reliant on the same motifs over and over again, even though those motifs are well drawn. It's also a disturbingly gruesome book that has scenes that left me revolted.
The tension and pacing is stunning. The escalation of violence is perfectly slow, to the point that you can't quite tell which event was the defining line between an outlier, and something that started the collapse. Ballard has excellent endings to chapters that are memorable moments looking back and were thrilling increases in tension that left me dying to read on. The prose is similarly strong, making for something that is both extremely readable without lacking style or depth.
The pacing is good in spite of Ballard's proclivity to lengthy bouts of metaphor and symbolism. Everything in High-Rise is seemingly a metaphor. Of course the book deals with social class and status, but it goes much deeper than that. The role of the structure that supports hierarchy in the oppression of lower classes, the ability to control our base instincts, tribalism, consumerism, and masochism to name a few. What Ballard really nailed was the quietly simmering violent tension that sometimes grows when there's an erosion of any sense of commons between people. That feeling of waiting for something to happen, something that you know will happen, and preparing yourself for it.
High-Rise is extremely memorable in a gnawing way that I see sticking in bits of my mind for a long time. One thing I can see is that it's certainly not for everyone. It's an acquired taste for sure, but I happen to like it a lot.
Ballard paints the scene of the tower so vividly; the slowly crumbling infrastructure and services that incite stress, and then the subsequent piles of refuse in the hallways, ubiquitous crass graffiti on the walls, makeshift furniture blockades in stairwells, entire floors completely devoid of electricity and running water. The tenets can leave the ever growing hellhole, but they begin to choose not to, choosing instead to wallow in their own filth and decay. I can picture it clearly because Ballard spends so much time detailing it. Yet I also think that he repeats the same examples a bit too frequently. I wish that he had been less reliant on the same motifs over and over again, even though those motifs are well drawn. It's also a disturbingly gruesome book that has scenes that left me revolted.
The tension and pacing is stunning. The escalation of violence is perfectly slow, to the point that you can't quite tell which event was the defining line between an outlier, and something that started the collapse. Ballard has excellent endings to chapters that are memorable moments looking back and were thrilling increases in tension that left me dying to read on. The prose is similarly strong, making for something that is both extremely readable without lacking style or depth.
The pacing is good in spite of Ballard's proclivity to lengthy bouts of metaphor and symbolism. Everything in High-Rise is seemingly a metaphor. Of course the book deals with social class and status, but it goes much deeper than that. The role of the structure that supports hierarchy in the oppression of lower classes, the ability to control our base instincts, tribalism, consumerism, and masochism to name a few. What Ballard really nailed was the quietly simmering violent tension that sometimes grows when there's an erosion of any sense of commons between people. That feeling of waiting for something to happen, something that you know will happen, and preparing yourself for it.
High-Rise is extremely memorable in a gnawing way that I see sticking in bits of my mind for a long time. One thing I can see is that it's certainly not for everyone. It's an acquired taste for sure, but I happen to like it a lot.