Perhaps because the novel was originally released in twenty instalments, but I found I was practically dragging myself through most of the story. Although some characters, like Mr Squeers, the Mantalinis, Newman Noggs, John Browdie, and of course Sir Mulberry Hawk, were very memorable and entertaining, I found the Nicklebys to be rather bland in comparison. Perhaps I have read too much of other English literature (Ralph Nickleby is another version of Ebenezer Scrooge, and Mrs Nickleby reminded me forcibly of Jane Austen's Mrs Bennet). I wonder if I simply prefer when Charles Dickens' writes about the experiences of children rather than from a grown like Nicholas Nickleby. But beyond relatively uneventful or at least unexciting plot lines, Dickens delivers his usual insights into human nature and descriptions of 19th century London with his characteristic poetic and stylised prose, and that in itself is worth reading, to my view.

***EDIT***
Having watched the film today (the 2001 two-part version, which I think is much better than the Hollywood 2002 one), I have changed my mind a bit. I still think the plot is not as well-spun as other Dickens' works, but I really quite like Nicholas. This might be due to his resemblance (especially in the film) to someone I am very fond of.

Also, I am beginning to realise that Dickens struggled with creating well-developed female characters. They all seem rather flat; they are caricatures of different (those that are celebrated and those that are treated with derision and contempt) aspects of women. In reality, if he had combined the obvious characteristics of Fanny Squeers, Tilly Price, Madeline Bray, Kate Nickleby, and Mrs Nickleby (to name the major players) he might have managed to paint a truer portrait of the female psyche. Or at the very least a more realistic female character.

This is my first time reading a full-length novel by Charles Dickens. It was a great book. Next up, David Copperfield!
challenging dark emotional funny medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

I think this is my favorite of Dickens' novels yet.
adventurous funny hopeful medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
challenging dark emotional reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

While NN benefits from its author's delightful writing style, its characters don't seem to evolve. The title character begins as a noble young man and ends as a noble old man. The villain lives a villain and dies a villain. Consequently, NN feels more like the tale of a bunch of interesting things that happened to or around its title character than a novel in the modern sense of the word.
adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous emotional funny hopeful sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes