debo03's review

Go to review page

3.0

I mean, this was something.
The rating is a classic anthology rating, because to nobody's surprise there are very different approaches to the topic of female submissives in this book and as per usual I didn't like all of them. Some were pretty far off from sexy to me, some were really sensual and some didn't affect me whichever way. As far as kinks go, the diversity is pretty solid. As far as other diversities go, there was a vast spectrum of ages, but ONE which had a gender dysphoric Black MC and sadly that was it. I especially missed a f/f perspective. I suppose CWs for a SM anthology won't be a surprise and I hope nobody picks this up without being sure they can vibe with that. The most relationships depicted here really go for the punishment/discipline, humiliation and force aspect, this isn't simple bondage content, so be aware that there's consensual (!) physical abuse between adults. (From choking to spanking to flogging to caning to submission of bodily autonomy)

dav's review

Go to review page

1.0

I once volunteered as an extra in a photo shoot with the model on the cover, Mischa. I'm a fan of hers, and I always liked the stuff from the old nerve.com so I gave this a shot.

Damn awful. Although to be honest, I didn't make it past the second short story. My wife and I tried reading it together. I read one aloud, she read one. Somehow it seemed somewhat entertaining when you were the listener, but it was painful to read.

The best erotic literature is first and foremost literature. The only acceptable difference is that when the sex scenes start it doesn't shy away from the details. This was just crap.

Skip this and just reload the Fifty Shades Generator based on [b:Fifty Shades of Grey|10818853|Fifty Shades of Grey (Fifty Shades, #1)|E.L. James|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1300842729s/10818853.jpg|15732562] (which I hear is also crap but the random passage generator is hilarious in a scatological way).
More...