Reviews tagging 'Mental illness'

Truly Devious by Maureen Johnson

43 reviews

sevenletters's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

greatexpectations77's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

I thought this was so much fun, and the author seems extremely cool. I loved how realistic the characters seemed, and I'm such a fan of a puzzle. I'm really looking forward to reading more in this series. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

headinthepages's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

some_random_person_hi's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.75

Great until the ending in the way that I can't believe the ending even counts as an ending.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rylin_marie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

oh. my. goodness. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

m4rtt4's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

A good start for the series, though it was very obvious from the text that it's a part of something bigger and doesn't really work as a standalone. The characters felt pretty shallow and stereotypically one-dimensional, but I could brush that off as the book's focus was more on the murders and the atmosphere really managed to creep me out at times — also the surroundings of the boarding school were well created and described. I'm excited to read the sequel, but I seriously hope it's got some more depth and action in it🤞🏻

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emkaho's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

themoodreader's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

awebofstories's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Grade: A (subject to change upon completion of the trilogy)

My daughter has expressed interest in reading Agatha Christie and loves watching television adaptations.  When I heard about this series (on the All About Agatha podcast), I immediately purchased the boxed trilogy and the following 4th book for her for Christmas. 

And she still hasn't read it.

However, my interest was piqued.  I asked to borrow her books, and she handed over the still shrink-wrapped trilogy, promising that she would start it once summer break arrived.  I went into this book as an opportunity to discuss something with my daughter, but I ended up enjoying it on its own merits.

We meet Stevie, a student at an eccentric and exclusive Vermont Boarding school with a dark history.  In fact, it was the dark history that attracted Stevie to the school.  You see, Stevie wants to be the next iteration of Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot, and Miss Marple, and she is determined to solve the mystery at the center of the school's history.

Stevie is a wonderful character.  She's a believable teen dealing with many of the problems teens face today.  She also suffers from severe Anxiety.  If I could only choose one thing to praise in this book, it would be Johnson's depiction of Stevie's anxiety and how she works it into the story.  This is probably the best depiction of it that I have read anywhere.

I loved the world of this book.  Yes, the basis of the school is a little ridiculous if you spend too much time thinking about it, but it works perfectly here.  I wish I could have attended this school, or one like it, without all the murder.  I can't wait to come back to Ellingham Academy.

The one thing about this book is that it is the first in a trilogy, and readers need to incorporate that into their expectations.  While I gave this book a grade based on my enjoyment, I reserve the right to change that once I finish the trilogy. (To clarify, the first 3 books work as a trilogy.  After that, books are more or less series novels).

My only complaint about this book is that I had trouble keeping some secondary characters straight.  Set in a school, there is necessarily a not-small cast here.  One of the things that I respect most about the book's strongest influence, Agatha Christie, is that she could create a distinct cast.  Here, some of the students melted into each other, and I sometimes had trouble keeping track of who was who.

Other than that, this book was a great success for me.  I'm excited not only to read the next book but also for my daughter to start this series, as I know that she will enjoy it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tangleroot_eli's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
I really like many things about this book. It's fast-paced and witty and acknowledges its sleuthing roots without being completely wedded to the genre's tropes.

That said, I felt annoyed or outright alarmed about several things in the book that made it harder to get through than I'd expected.

  • I know how pedantic this sounds, but the kidnapper is not called "Truly Devious." They're called "Devious." The "Truly" is the letter's closing, like "Love, Tipper," "Sincerely, Your Friends at State Farm," etc. And while I bought that Stevie, a 21st-century teenager who probably doesn't write many formal letters, wouldn't know this, the idea that the 1936 characters would look at a letter signed "Truly, Devious" and call that letter-writer "Truly Devious" was one of the least believable parts of the book.
  • Relatively early in the book, Janelle tells Stevie that Vi uses they/them pronouns. Stevie proceeds to use she/her pronouns for Vi for the rest of the book. From this I have to conclude that either Stevie, Maureen Johnson, or the Katherine Tegen copyeditors don't care about respecting people's pronouns.
  • I did note the book's one solid clue as to Devious's  identity before Stevie starts putting things together in the end. But it was so obvious and heavy-handed in an otherwise subtle book that I immediately dismissed it as a red herring. The fact that it genuinely is a clue? I'm still not sure if that's sloppy writing or sheer genius on Johnson's part.
     
  •  
    The book never points toward an adult as a possibility for Hayes's killer. I think this is Johnson's way of showing how little adults matter to Stevie: they're either obstacles to overcome, like her parents, or mentors to learn from, like Larry. But in a book about and allegedly for teenagers, I was disconcerted that the only suspects were teenagers.
     
  •  
    How do I loathe David? Let me count the ways. He's not funny. He's not charming. He's a classist, misogynist, douchey edgelord who thinks that being an ass to pretty much everyone he meets is the way to stick it to his morality- and propriety-obsessed father and doesn't realize or care that he's actually recapitulating his father's worst behaviors. The first time he and Stevie kissed, I groaned, "Noooo! Not this asshole!" The “if a boy is mean to you, that means he likes you, and you should totally go along with that” trope needs to die yesterday. After the scene where David wheedles his way into lunch with Stevie's parents, I was so livid I almost couldn't read on. This isn't my first teen sleuth rodeo. I understand that Johnson writes David this way so that when Stevie starts to suspect that Hayes' death was murder, readers immediately think of disdainful, deceitful David and share Stevie's panic: Is he a killer? Has she been making out with a killer? But this is done in such a clunky way that Johnson may as well put David in a T-shirt that says, This schmuck isn't the killer. But if he's not a killer, he's still a schmuck. I'll read to the end of the original trilogy, because I'm too interested in the Ellingham case and Hayes' death not to know how they resolve. But if David continues to be a major player and doesn't have a major character transformation, I'll not be reading the standalones, because no one needs that much schmuck.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings