Reviews

The Cat Who Could Read Backwards by Lilian Jackson Braun

sarahrheawerner's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

So... I finally gave in to my curiosity (no puns about cat-killing, now) and read what I had long viewed as a member of a weird fringe genre of literature: CAT MYSTERIES!

The Cat Who Could Read Backwards by Lilian Jackson Braun is the first in one such series (dubbed "The Cat Who..." mystery series).

I was a little disheartened that the cat (named Koko) was not the main character -- rather, he plays supporting actor to newspaper reporter Jim Qwilleran as the latter finds out who kills a local art critic.

Notably, The Cat Who Could Read Backwards was published in 1966, so there are no mobile phones in characters' pockets, no computers in the newsroom, all newspapers are printed on paper, etc.

And honestly, that just made this cozy mystery feel all the more cozy to me. There's just something about reading a paper book or newspaper by the fire with a cat curled up in your lap that's incredibly comforting. Despite, you know, all the murder that keeps happening.

This is a good-natured, cozy murder mystery that pokes fun at the pretentious nature of the art world while elevating the pretentious nature of cats. I liked it, much to my surprise. But I'm not incredibly sure it's worth your time.

Get the full scoop in the latest episode of the Write Now podcast.

crimsonsparrow's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

perfectpinkypie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

astha97's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted mysterious

3.5

vanillacomoro's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.75

book_concierge's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Book # 1 in a cozy mystery series featuring James Qwilleran, a newspaper reporter in an unnamed Midwestern city, and an extraordinary Siamese cat, Koko.

I’m sure I’ve read this before, because it was vaguely familiar, but I did not have it on my “read” list on Goodreads, so decided to give it a go.

I love cozy mysteries, and this is a great series. Qwilleran is a good amateur detective. As a reporter he is appropriately curious and has a great excuse for gathering information. In this first outing, he’s been assigned to the features desk, writing about the local art scene. No, he’s not the art critic, he does public interest pieces on artists and events. Being somewhat new to town, he has a lot to learn and he’s finding quite a lot of intrigue in the local art scene … even before a prominent gallery owner is found murdered.

I like the way that Braun uses Koko to help Qwilleran. This is not a talking cat! (Although Siamese are known for their loud and interesting vocalizations.)

An altogether satisfying cozy mystery, and I recommend the series.

ketutar's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

five stars for what it is - that is, a mystery.

The "detective couple" is an art journalist and a cat that used to belong to an art critique.

I like the characters, I liked the plot. I didn't like the solution, because I liked the murderer. :-D I would have wanted to have them in future books.

emwai's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious relaxing fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

barizley's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This series was my grandma’s favorite, so I thought I’d check it out. Sorry, Grandma. I did not like this book. Bad portrayals of women, too many dull characters and red herrings, and the ending was confusing. One bright spot: the overwrought art critiques were (sadly) spot on and hilarious.

natalumizz's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Miało być przyjemne, jesienne cozy mystery, a była tylko straszna nuda.