3.92 AVERAGE


Such a joy reading these. As mentioned before. Some of the comments made at times, sexism, racism, nationalism. I roll my eyes. The books are a product of their time. But, the mystery is always magnificently crafted. And these are passing comments. It’s not rampant. This book has a lot of: oh you know women have no sense! Regardless, I adore Poirot and his idiosyncrasies. Hastings too.

I love what Agatha Christie can do under 300 pgs that others can’t do in 600.

This was a really fun, Sunday-afternoon-type read for me. It was very easy to read and I found it generally enjoyable (even if Poirot could come across as very egotistical; it seemed to be portrayed rather comically so it didn't get too annoying). I'd definitely read more Poirot books after reading this one!

Agatha Christie's brilliancy in creating intriguing murder mystery plots is yet again displayed here. The final plot twist left me stunned. I didn't expect it at all!

Interestingly, here the great Hercule Poirot is a little baffled with the circumstances surrounding the mystery. For the first time, Christie shows that after all Poirot is human too, though a very clever one. Nevertheless, with so many tangled facts at hands, and after going a little astray, Poirot solves the puzzle at the end securing his unsurpassed reputation.

This is again a well-written story which keeps the reader engaged till the very end. I enjoyed it.

Review: https://clife.blog/2022/09/19/book-review-peril-at-the-end-house-by-agatha-christie/

Good twist.

This was a fun one. Extremely satisfying and witty in true Christie fashion.

I really enjoyed this one. I think I'll have to reread it so I can see all the hints along the way!
adventurous mysterious

I was able to guess this one! It was still a fun and interesting read though. 

Hastings and Poirot were kind of funny together. There were a handful of references to other Poirot books, which I hadn’t come across before.

I was surprised by how many typos were in the edition I have.
dark mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

I liked this one, overall. It stars the clever Hercule Poirot -- still clever, still Belgian -- and the steadfast Hastings once again serves as our narrator. It felt nice to read about the sun-drenched Cornish coast in summer, whilst I sat in lockdown on a grey January day. The characters were suitably mysterious and full of secrets, and the novel had all of the 1930s vibes that I long for in an Agatha Christie mystery -- cocktails, silk dresses, parties, extended stays in luxury hotels. I thought I had worked out this mystery before the end, though of course, I hadn't. I did feel a bit smart, though, because I had worked out a small part of it, and I had given consideration to the actual conclusion. But largely, no. Poirot, mon ami, those grey cells!

I would note, this novel includes several unfortunate references to Jewish stereotypes and others -- they really stood out to me this time. I know other Christie books have outdated, negative stereotypes, but they really irked me reading this book. More than usual. The ending was pretty clever, but until the mystery reveal I felt certain I'd give this book three stars, in large part because of these stereotypes. And of course, the last moment recalled a bit of a stereotype, too. *Sigh*

The peril at the end house was a four star read for me and I enjoyed it immensely