Reviews

Pastworld by Ian Beck

tregina's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's the central concept and setting that really get the stars here. The characters tend to be lacking in personality and the plot is basically by-the-numbers, but the whole setting raises ethical questions that the narrative doesn't ignore. London is turned into a theme park depicting the Victorian era with such accuracy that murder is a known risk of entry, but in many ways its less a theme park than a zoo, where visitors come to gawk mostly at the living beings within, only in this zoo the visitors are inside the cages. The city now exists so much separate from the rest of the world that even its laws are dialed back to Victorian England. The past isn't sanitized for safe viewing, but it also isn't entirely authentic with visitors and residents alike knowing perfectly well what it is. But the visitors come to see the gory spectacles, to see the violence and poverty, and aren't really fussed whether they're real or staged. What does that say about us? About the world? These are the areas I would have liked to delve deeper into, but I'm glad they were there at all.

tarryncurrentlyreading's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I don't exactly know what the point of this book was. It just kind of...happened. And then it was done. Moving on.

flyingsails's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Soooo disappointing after the trailer, which made it look mysterious and interesting. My favorite part was the idea of the continually and repeated Jack the Ripper attacks and deaths being played out by the same two people.

zimtsterni's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Pastworld ist ein Themenpark im London. Wir schreiben das Jahr 2048 und das alte, viktorianische London in Pastworld zieht jeden Tag zahlreiche Besucher an. Die Buckland Corporation hat eine Welt geschaffen, in der man sich wirklich in die Vergangenheit zurückversetzt fühlt. Die Lampen, die Pubs, die Kleidung der Menschen – all dies hat mir dem Zeitalter der Technik und Moderne wenig zu tun.
Calebs Vater ist ein wichtiger Mitarbeiter der Buckland Corporation und nimmt seinen Sohn zu einem Ausflug in den Themenpark mit. Bevor sie den Park per Luftschiff betreten streifen sie ihr altes Ich ab und begeben sich in die viktorianische Zeit, mit all ihren Gesetzen und Regeln. Hier leben Menschen, wie zum Beispiel die junge Eve, bereits ihr ganzes Leben und einige ahnen nicht, dass sie sich unter einer Art Glocke befinden und ein ganz anderes Leben führen, als die Menschen hinter den Grenzen von Pastworld.
Als sein Vater und er in ein Handgemenge geraten, steht Caleb plötzlich unter Mordverdacht und die einzige Strafe dafür ist der Tod. Mithilfe von Biblemac flieht er vor dem Arm des Gesetzes und versucht verzweifelt seinen verschwundenen Vater zu finden. Dabei begegnet er Eve, deren Schicksal untrennbar mit seinem verknüpft zu sein scheint.

Mein lieber Herr Gesangsverein! Es ist sehr lang her, dass mich ein Buch so wenig von sich überzeugen konnte wie Pastworld.
Erzählt wird die Geschichte aus verschiedenen Perspektiven. Zum einen aus der Sicht von Charles Catchpole, dem Chefinspektor von Scotland Yard, der auf der Suche nach dem geheimnisvollen Phantom ist, das in Pastworld mehrere Morde begeht. Dabei berichtet er vor allem von seinen Ermittlungen und den Ergebnissen: Eine weitere Perspektive bekommt der Leser durch Caleb. Seine Erlebnisse als Tourist und später als Gejagter im Themenpark verknüpfen sich im Laufe der Handlung mit den Tagebucheintragungen von Eve, die eine weitere Ebene bilden.
Man sollte meinen, dass die zahlreichen Perspektiven eine gewisse Abwechslung bieten. Dies gelingt Ian Beck jedoch nicht. Im Gegenteil, der Autor schafft es nicht seinen Figuren eine Vielschichtigkeit zu geben. Als Leser hat man das Gefühl gesichtslose Protagonisten vor sich zu haben, die sich in keiner Weise von den Randfiguren abheben.
Leider ist auch die Handlung keinesfalls spannend gestaltet. Man spürt, dass der Autor unbedingt Spannung erzeugen möchte, aber es gelingt ihm einfach nicht. Selbst die düstere Atmosphäre die man in Pastworld erwarten würde schafft er nicht einzufangen, so dass man das Buch auch in jedem anderen Kontext platzieren könnte. Seine Versuche Handlungsstränge und Spannung aufzubauen scheitern kläglich und man dümpelt s durch die Seiten. Zwar schafft er es vereinzelt, dass man gerne wissen möchte, wie er letztendlich alles auflöst, doch das Ende schlägt dem Fass den Boden aus. Die Auflösung, die ich hier nicht verraten werde, ist grotesk und schlicht und ergreifend lächerlich und komplett zusammenhangslos und hat bei mir nur ein fassungsloses Kopfschütteln ausgelöst.

Fazit:

Langweilig, unlogisch, sinnfrei und grotesk. Pastworld lebt nur durch die gute Hintergrundidee, jedoch schafft es der Autor nicht eine entsprechende Handlung aufzubauen. Die Figuren sind leblos und bleiben selbst während der Lektüre nicht im Gedächtnis. Schade.

ce3725's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Interesting premise, starts off well but ending is very meh and very little is explained fully

emilyjackson's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I didn't make it all the way through this one. What first caught my eye about it was the cover: a dark, foggy London alley with St. James Cathedral looming in the background and a Jack the Ripper character chasing a young girl. The plot seemed interesting enough. A replica of Victorian London has been built as a theme park for tourists to come and experience what life was like in Dickens day and a young girl living in the park has no idea it's really the year 2050.
The biggest problem with the story was that it was coming from entirely too many perspectives. And none of them were really that interesting. The other big problem I had with this was that I already read this novel once as a kid. It was called [b:Running Out of Time|227658|Running Out of Time|Margaret Peterson Haddix|http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/11R6NQ7ZFSL._SL75_.jpg|888455] and it was by far superior.
I want to give this another shot sometime in the future, but mostly just because I'll read anything London related.

teachercap_e's review

Go to review page

2.0

The book was a little slow at points and while the premise was all right it didn't have what I was expecting. I think a lot more could have been explored with this book. It was ok over all but really it dragged for me and I was rather disappointed.

tregina's review

Go to review page

3.0

It's the central concept and setting that really get the stars here. The characters tend to be lacking in personality and the plot is basically by-the-numbers, but the whole setting raises ethical questions that the narrative doesn't ignore. London is turned into a theme park depicting the Victorian era with such accuracy that murder is a known risk of entry, but in many ways its less a theme park than a zoo, where visitors come to gawk mostly at the living beings within, only in this zoo the visitors are inside the cages. The city now exists so much separate from the rest of the world that even its laws are dialed back to Victorian England. The past isn't sanitized for safe viewing, but it also isn't entirely authentic with visitors and residents alike knowing perfectly well what it is. But the visitors come to see the gory spectacles, to see the violence and poverty, and aren't really fussed whether they're real or staged. What does that say about us? About the world? These are the areas I would have liked to delve deeper into, but I'm glad they were there at all.

jersy's review

Go to review page

2.0

This had so much potential but all it delivered was characters that can hardly be described as such and a focus on the least interesting aspects of the plot (in my opinion).
It started of quit interesting, until a certain point I liked Eve´s POV. There was not that much to her as a character, but it still was an interesting story. I also wanted to know more about the Phantom. Unfortunately, these two were the most rare point of views and most chapters featured Caleb whom I couldn´t have cared less about. He had no real characteristics and just existed throughout most of the story while his father or BibleMac took the most actions in his chapters. The investigators chaptors were fine, some were quit interesting while most of them were not necessarily needed.

I was ok with the book, not really paying too much attention to Calebs later parts and looking forward to everything else, until Caleb and Eve met each other. It happens a little later in the book than I would have thought and has the most weird and rushed insta-love-like moment. From then on I kind of lost interest. The ending seemed a little out of nowhere with no real clues being giving throughout the book and even after the explanation I did not really get why this was a thing (might have been because I just skipped through the pages at this point, might have been explained better than I noticed). The phantom and Eve kind of had some chemistry, though, which surprised me, and I liked the short part with the two of them even though I´m not a huge fan of what happened there plot-wise. I also wished it did a little bit more with the Victorian setting.

While this wasn´t utterly terrible it was not really good or intriguing either. With some things being changed it might have been fine, like information being shared more reguarily and more clues being given, the writing would need some final touches too, since some phrases were kind of off and the character´s blandness was probably the biggest problem.
However, the concept was great (if not fully utilized within the story), the idea for the mystery was good and I guess for young and less experienced readers this can still be fun. For me, it just could not keep my interest up.