Scan barcode
cry279's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Violence, Slavery, Racial slurs, Homophobia, Death, Hate crime, Murder, War, Suicidal thoughts, Police brutality, and Racism
kylosten's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Racism, Racial slurs, Slavery, War, and Violence
Moderate: Hate crime and Homophobia
what_is_emma_reading's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Death, Violence, and Slavery
Moderate: Homophobia and Sexual content
Minor: War
voela321's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Murder, Racism, Homophobia, and Slavery
therainbowshelf's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Alcohol, Blood, Ableism, Emotional abuse, Fire/Fire injury, Classism, Medical content, Death, Death of parent, Gaslighting, Homophobia, Slavery, Injury/Injury detail, Police brutality, Toxic relationship, Confinement, Gore, Gun violence, Racism, Violence, Grief, Hate crime, Medical trauma, Murder, Racial slurs, and Suicidal thoughts
Moderate: Homophobia
Minor: Infidelity, Sexual content, and War
Death of family membersspark_879's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Racial slurs and Racism
Moderate: Homophobia
Minor: Fire/Fire injury
saff10's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Pros :
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, and Homophobia
deedireads's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
TL;DR REVIEW:
I found The Sweetness of Water to be easy to sink into, a compelling story. I’m not sure I would have put it on the Booker longlist, myself, but I did like it. (PSA: It’s not a queer story, as the cover blurb suggests.)
For you if: You like historical fiction.
FULL REVIEW:
I read The Sweetness of Water because it was longlisted for last year’s Booker Prize. It was one I was most eager to read, particularly because the cover blurb positioned it as a partially queer novel set during American reconstruction. Unfortunately, this is a significant mischaracterization. Fortunately, I was warned beforehand and was able to go into the reading experience without that errant expectation.
The story is about two brothers, recently freed from the institution of slavery, who find themselves in the woods of George and Isabel Walker, who are white. (Minor spoiler ahead.) When their son, against all odds, returns from the Civil War, it sets off a violent chain reaction that leaves our characters’ lives overturned, and exposes just how far their town still has to go.
I read this book in just a few sittings — I sank into it easily and found myself swept up in first the characters, then the story (as the first and second halves of the book seem to focus on those things one at a time, respectively). The prose, too, is beautifully written. I think it had some interesting things to say about masculinity and deciding to speak up for what you feel to be right even when you know it’s the self-destructive thing to do. That said, as many of my fellow book club members expressed, the reader is left uncertain what Harris’s thesis is — because if it’s the obvious one, we remained a bit unconvinced.
All in all, a solid read if you need something compelling, although I’m note sure I’d have put it on the Booker list myself.
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Slavery, and Murder
Moderate: Gun violence, Violence, and Grief
Minor: War, Homophobia, and Death
amndaj's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Death, Slavery, Murder, Racial slurs, and Racism
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury, War, Colonisation, Outing, Physical abuse, Classism, Grief, Hate crime, and Homophobia
Minor: Blood, Child death, Death of parent, Grief, Gun violence, Injury/Injury detail, Bullying, Mental illness, and Panic attacks/disorders
eddie_dee's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Slavery, Blood, Death, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Violence, War, and Homophobia
Minor: Gun violence and Fire/Fire injury