Scan barcode
gemmasdilemma's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Minor: Sexual assault
kayahcherie's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Violence
Moderate: Child abuse and Sexual assault
amiegold's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Child abuse, Gun violence, Incest, and Sexual assault
pershie13's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Cancer, Murder, Child abuse, Domestic abuse, Pedophilia, Terminal illness, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Injury/Injury detail, Suicide, Adult/minor relationship, Blood, Sexual violence, and Sexual assault
Moderate: Medical content, Kidnapping, Infidelity, Sexual content, Mental illness, Pregnancy, Panic attacks/disorders, Cursing, Grief, and Religious bigotry
ollie_again's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Graphic: Violence, Murder, Grief, and Death
Moderate: Sexual assault, Child abuse, Homophobia, Hate crime, Cancer, Pedophilia, and Suicide
Minor: Racism, Torture, Religious bigotry, Pregnancy, and Incest
alexcribbs's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
4.75
Minor: Child abuse and Sexual assault
meemawreads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
2.0
I don’t read much by cishet dudes but I’m more willing to try when they’re not American. It didn’t work. Plot spoilers ahead!
✈️
An Air France plane hits turbulence but lands in America in March. In June, the same plane lands with the same people who are atomically identical with identical memories. In the months between, one of the March passengers has committed suicide so the June version is now the only one, a March passenger has gotten pregnant and her June copy isn’t but they’re both in love with the same man, March-landing children have had birthdays while no time has passed for June children. I was excited to see an exploration into how these characters who were introduced in the first half of the book reacted to having a copy self in the world. But rather than focus on characters, the book seemed more caught up in the philosophy. Was this string theory? Time travel? Are we living in a simulation? Those abstract things don’t interest me nearly as much as exploring the characters and relationships. I was socialized female, so I see the world in terms of relationships and I’d love to see how this topic would be written about differently by a woman/femme. As it is though, it was unsatisfying and a little interesting. Two taters 🥔🥔/🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔
Moderate: Sexual assault and Child abuse
lesenilpferd's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Sexual assault, Cancer, Pedophilia, Incest, Sexual violence, Suicide, and Terminal illness
bobin's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Sexual assault, Pedophilia, Suicide, Suicide attempt, Child abuse, Murder, and Gore
carrington's review against another edition
I know this book is meant to help us ponder our own existence, but I felt it leaned it too far to our own similarities than our differences. If you saw your double, perhaps you’d have identical thoughts but odds are… you wouldn’t. Because, in this case, the two individuals have had different lived experiences (for the past 3 months). I wanted more from the meeting of the minds, mainly because the author does such a fantastic job creating these minds at the onset of the novel.
Lastly, this is the second book I’ve read this year in which a male author writes about a sexual assault done to a woman/girl. It does next to nothing for the story and feels largely unnecessary to include/ describe to some detail, which was honestly upsetting.
Minor: Sexual assault