Scan barcode
amac_reads's review against another edition
2.0
This book was a slog to get through. I disliked the author's writing style; it made what should have been a fascinating retelling of legends boring. Rather than storytelling and interesting dialogue, it was almost completely exposition, which made the book really dry. Also I believe the author was trying to make the reader like the characters, but they weren't well-written. They were also written as people with mostly negative/bad traits but the author tried to present it positively, which I found problematic. I won't be reading anything else by this author.
lauramcc7's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence
brianwork's review against another edition
4.0
The stories are wonderful, but the writing itself can be a little tough to get through due to the archaic (and oftentimes repetitive) style.
edb14's review against another edition
3.0
Shockingly, this is my first time reading one of the traditional King Arthur tales. Up until now, I gleaned all of my knowledge through cultural osmosis and the Disney animated movie "The Sword in the Stone." I was familiar with names like Sir Launcelot, Sir Gawain, the Round Table, and Excalibur, but I didn't really know how all of those stories fitted together and who did what to whom. So, having obtained a beautifully bound copy of this book from a friend, I gave it a go.
The stories are full of knights going out into the woods looking for "adventure" which always inevitably ended up being jousting with some other random knight. Clearly these people had way too much time and money on their hands. How could there possibly be this many knights in the woods in full armor? Many of them were doing nothing more than guarding a bridge or watching a group of women throw mud at a shield because they had been asked to. At one point, Sir Gawain breaks up a fight between a pair of knights who were arguing about which of them should go on an adventure. He berates them for starting a serious quarrel over something so trivial, then proceeds to go further into the wood and fight with another mystery knight over which of them can go on an adventure. It becomes ludicrous, and much of the drama and interest is sapped from these stories for me because of these shenanigans.
However, I thought it came to life again anytime magic or the fay were involved. Then the adventures had more peril and more nobility and interest. It opened up the stories to more than just knights whacking each other with sticks. King Arthur himself was an interesting character who had flaws but was generally likeable and good-hearted. Anytime Arthur was the focus of a story, I was engaged and interested in the outcome. The other knights could just go and fill their helmets with sand for all I cared.
These stories are of course beautifully captured in Pyle's classic prose style; his descriptions are gorgeous and I love his summation of the stories, especially when he cheekily criticized his own characters for their bad decisions or pointless posturing. He is a master of writing in the spirit of classic stories while infusing them with modern and more relatable sensibilities. If you are wanting a classic-feeling introduction to these old tales that are still readable, then Howard Pyle is your man.
The stories are full of knights going out into the woods looking for "adventure" which always inevitably ended up being jousting with some other random knight. Clearly these people had way too much time and money on their hands. How could there possibly be this many knights in the woods in full armor? Many of them were doing nothing more than guarding a bridge or watching a group of women throw mud at a shield because they had been asked to. At one point, Sir Gawain breaks up a fight between a pair of knights who were arguing about which of them should go on an adventure. He berates them for starting a serious quarrel over something so trivial, then proceeds to go further into the wood and fight with another mystery knight over which of them can go on an adventure. It becomes ludicrous, and much of the drama and interest is sapped from these stories for me because of these shenanigans.
However, I thought it came to life again anytime magic or the fay were involved. Then the adventures had more peril and more nobility and interest. It opened up the stories to more than just knights whacking each other with sticks. King Arthur himself was an interesting character who had flaws but was generally likeable and good-hearted. Anytime Arthur was the focus of a story, I was engaged and interested in the outcome. The other knights could just go and fill their helmets with sand for all I cared.
These stories are of course beautifully captured in Pyle's classic prose style; his descriptions are gorgeous and I love his summation of the stories, especially when he cheekily criticized his own characters for their bad decisions or pointless posturing. He is a master of writing in the spirit of classic stories while infusing them with modern and more relatable sensibilities. If you are wanting a classic-feeling introduction to these old tales that are still readable, then Howard Pyle is your man.
soph_gawryla's review against another edition
adventurous
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
paterson's review against another edition
4.0
Arthurian legends were a favorite of mine in middle school.
greeniezona's review against another edition
4.0
A bedtime story book that I read aloud to my eight-year-old. I found it a lot less stuffy than the collection by Roger Lancelyn Green that I read to my older son some years back. The language was very stylized, and there were a few phrases that it took my brain several chapters before it stopped trying to replace "missing" words -- but it didn't seem to borrow my kid at all.
We thoroughly enjoyed this, and if I ever get around to picking up a kid-appropriate grail story, I'm sure that I'll look for Pyle's version.
We thoroughly enjoyed this, and if I ever get around to picking up a kid-appropriate grail story, I'm sure that I'll look for Pyle's version.
metalmakubex's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
This was a really great introduction to Arthurian legend. It hits a lot of the iconic stories, while still going through lesser known ones as well. I was entertained by the whimsical way it was written.
However, this book is being marketed as appealing to 10-13 year olds. While I think the content of the stories would definitely entertain that age range, I have a hard time imagining most preteens having the patience to make it through the difficult Middle English language. If I had picked this up at that range, I would have lost interest quickly. I can imagine reading this to a kid, however. The length of the individual stories would be very conducive to a good bedtime story for many nights in a row.
I would recommend this to anyone interested in Arthurian legend, but isn't sure about where to start.
drigoangelo's review against another edition
4.0
3.5
Acho que é uma boa leitura para quem tem interesse pelas lendas arturianas. Conta a história de como Artur se tornou rei, o início da Ordem dos Cavaleiros da Tavola Redonda e algumas aventuras de Artur e outros cavaleiros.
No geral, é uma leitura divertida. Acho que quem gostou da série Merlin vai gostar deste livro.
Fiquei também com a sensação que seria um bom livro de histórias para contar para crianças antes de dormir, pois o livro é composto por pequenos episódios de trama simples.
O foco do livro é mais as passagens/aventuras do que as personagens, mas à medida que fui lendo as histórias, consegui ir formando uma imagem mais profunda das personagens.
Algumas passagens ficaram um pouco repetitivas, como todas as vezes que ele descreve um duelo (estilo as antigas justas) entre cavaleiros. Mas entendo que os próprios duelos, se fossem na vida real, seriam sempre praticamente iguais uns aos outros, então tudo bem. Depois que me acostumei ao ritmo do livro, a leitura fluiu bem.
Outro detalhe é que, diferente de As Brumas de Avalon, este livro tem um ponto de vista extremamente católico, ao ponto de ter momentos em que o narrador se dirige ao leitor dando alguma lição de moral, ou pedindo que siga este ou aquele preceito dessa religião.
Acho que é uma boa leitura para quem tem interesse pelas lendas arturianas. Conta a história de como Artur se tornou rei, o início da Ordem dos Cavaleiros da Tavola Redonda e algumas aventuras de Artur e outros cavaleiros.
No geral, é uma leitura divertida. Acho que quem gostou da série Merlin vai gostar deste livro.
Fiquei também com a sensação que seria um bom livro de histórias para contar para crianças antes de dormir, pois o livro é composto por pequenos episódios de trama simples.
O foco do livro é mais as passagens/aventuras do que as personagens, mas à medida que fui lendo as histórias, consegui ir formando uma imagem mais profunda das personagens.
Algumas passagens ficaram um pouco repetitivas, como todas as vezes que ele descreve um duelo (estilo as antigas justas) entre cavaleiros. Mas entendo que os próprios duelos, se fossem na vida real, seriam sempre praticamente iguais uns aos outros, então tudo bem. Depois que me acostumei ao ritmo do livro, a leitura fluiu bem.
Outro detalhe é que, diferente de As Brumas de Avalon, este livro tem um ponto de vista extremamente católico, ao ponto de ter momentos em que o narrador se dirige ao leitor dando alguma lição de moral, ou pedindo que siga este ou aquele preceito dessa religião.
cat_queen005's review against another edition
adventurous
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0