Scan barcode
stargazerave's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
There's so much to say about A Clockwork Orange, I'm not entirely sure where to start.
I'll preface this review with the following: I've never seen the film and have limited exposure to Kubrick's works in general so I went into this novel relatively blind. I'd only heard of the film by name with no real explanation as to what it was about, making my first experience with Burgess' work a standout and leads me solidly into the camp of wishing the final chapter had been included in the film.
A Clockwork Orange is, at its core, a story about morality. We begin the novel with our protagonist, Alex, and his gang of lackies. Immediately from the jump, you're completely immersed in their world as Burgess spares no moment to explain anything from the setting to the distinct dialect we see used throughout the book's pages. To say I found it a touch hard to follow in the beginning would be an understatement. This, however, ended up adding to my overall takeaway from the novella. Bear with me, we'll get there. Spoilers to follow.
The story follows Alex, beginning our tale when he's the humble age of 15 and ending shortly after his 18th birthday. Throughout the course of its first chapters, the reader very quickly gains the understanding that Alex is not a good person. There are explicit, once you understand the dialect, depictions of murder, rape, and violence in general and Burgess makes no attempt to make you feel any amount of pity. It's explicitly clear that not only does Alex do these things of his own volition, he genuinely enjoys them too. The novella is written as though Alex himself is writing it, he refers to himself as "Your Humble Narrator" throughout the length of its pages, making the experience feel almost autobiographical in a way as if he takes pleasure in detailing his crimes.
This all changes however when Alex is arrested for the murder of an elderly woman and it is here that Burgess' delicate dance with morality begins. We see a short bit of Alex's time in prison, generally with the theme that he'll serve his years and then get back to how his life was before, though he exhibits a newfound enjoyment for the Bible and religion during his time behind bars. Burgess truly begins to challenge the reader's moral compass when Alex is taken into a State Center for Prison Reform.
There is really only one way I could describe Alex's 'treatment' in guise of reform. Alex is tortured and Burgess lays all out to bear. The question then becomes this. Does Alex's former involvement and perpetration of objectively heinous crimes entitle him to a fortnight of psychological torture? Does the perpetration of a crime warrant the criminal to undergo treatment of debatably the same severity? Why is this torture sanctioned and encouraged? Is it moral to sanction psychological torture if the outcome is a reformed criminal? Does it not just strip the individual of independent thought? Does the repentance of a murderer retain any meaning if the repentance is brought on by repeated Pavlovian conditioning and not the perpetrator's free thought?
Burgess continues to explore this as we follow Alex after his release, his 'reform' having been deemed successful. We see him return home only to find a stranger in his place next to his parents, the welcome he was expecting turned cold and unaccepting in reality. We follow Alex next as he revisits many of the places he and his cronies frequented in the book's opening pages, culminating ultimately in his brutalization and abandonment by his former 'friend' and former enemy. It is here Alex returns to a very prominent place in his story: the home of a man whose wife he brutally attacked and gang raped years ago which led to her untimely death.
At first, the man, a writer of a novel of the same name as the one I review now, doesn't recognize Alex and instead takes him in under a guise of kindness with the plan of using Alex and his story as a political pawn. And he does just that, handing our protagonist off to three of his colleagues just as he begins to realize Alex's true identity. It is with these three colleagues that Alex's mistreatment continues, culminating in the youth's attempted suicide. After a short stay in the hospital, Alex is released once again with the assurances of safety from the very people who initiated his first bout of torture in the name of 'reform'.
Unfortunately for them, Alex's suicide attempt seems to have undone a majority of the classical conditioning embedded into his psyche with much of his bloodlust and love for violence returning as he lays in his hospital bed. What we see now though, as Alex leaves the hospital, is a brief return to his former criminal compulsions before we see a genuine change in our protagonist. The final chapter of the novel, omitted from the film, shows us that, despite all he's undergone, Alex has grown. He longs for a family, specifically a son, and we end the novel with a final farewell from our leading man.
TL;DR: The ending of A Clockwork Orange is one that left me deeply contemplative and to say it didn't affect me would be a lie. Burgess' entrancing playfulness with language and the detailed horrific mistreatment undergone by his protagonist provides a haunting dichotomy that lingers with the reader as they near its final pages and leaves them pondering many sociological ideas, truly exploring the limits of human morality and what it means to make a choice.
I'll preface this review with the following: I've never seen the film and have limited exposure to Kubrick's works in general so I went into this novel relatively blind. I'd only heard of the film by name with no real explanation as to what it was about, making my first experience with Burgess' work a standout and leads me solidly into the camp of wishing the final chapter had been included in the film.
A Clockwork Orange is, at its core, a story about morality. We begin the novel with our protagonist, Alex, and his gang of lackies. Immediately from the jump, you're completely immersed in their world as Burgess spares no moment to explain anything from the setting to the distinct dialect we see used throughout the book's pages. To say I found it a touch hard to follow in the beginning would be an understatement. This, however, ended up adding to my overall takeaway from the novella. Bear with me, we'll get there. Spoilers to follow.
This all changes however when Alex is arrested for the murder of an elderly woman and it is here that Burgess' delicate dance with morality begins. We see a short bit of Alex's time in prison, generally with the theme that he'll serve his years and then get back to how his life was before, though he exhibits a newfound enjoyment for the Bible and religion during his time behind bars. Burgess truly begins to challenge the reader's moral compass when Alex is taken into a State Center for Prison Reform.
There is really only one way I could describe Alex's 'treatment' in guise of reform. Alex is tortured and Burgess lays all out to bear. The question then becomes this. Does Alex's former involvement and perpetration of objectively heinous crimes entitle him to a fortnight of psychological torture? Does the perpetration of a crime warrant the criminal to undergo treatment of debatably the same severity? Why is this torture sanctioned and encouraged? Is it moral to sanction psychological torture if the outcome is a reformed criminal? Does it not just strip the individual of independent thought? Does the repentance of a murderer retain any meaning if the repentance is brought on by repeated Pavlovian conditioning and not the perpetrator's free thought?
Burgess continues to explore this as we follow Alex after his release, his 'reform' having been deemed successful. We see him return home only to find a stranger in his place next to his parents, the welcome he was expecting turned cold and unaccepting in reality. We follow Alex next as he revisits many of the places he and his cronies frequented in the book's opening pages, culminating ultimately in his brutalization and abandonment by his former 'friend' and former enemy. It is here Alex returns to a very prominent place in his story: the home of a man whose wife he brutally attacked and gang raped years ago which led to her untimely death.
At first, the man, a writer of a novel of the same name as the one I review now, doesn't recognize Alex and instead takes him in under a guise of kindness with the plan of using Alex and his story as a political pawn. And he does just that, handing our protagonist off to three of his colleagues just as he begins to realize Alex's true identity. It is with these three colleagues that Alex's mistreatment continues, culminating in the youth's attempted suicide. After a short stay in the hospital, Alex is released once again with the assurances of safety from the very people who initiated his first bout of torture in the name of 'reform'.
Unfortunately for them, Alex's suicide attempt seems to have undone a majority of the classical conditioning embedded into his psyche with much of his bloodlust and love for violence returning as he lays in his hospital bed. What we see now though, as Alex leaves the hospital, is a brief return to his former criminal compulsions before we see a genuine change in our protagonist. The final chapter of the novel, omitted from the film, shows us that, despite all he's undergone, Alex has grown. He longs for a family, specifically a son, and we end the novel with a final farewell from our leading man.
TL;DR: The ending of A Clockwork Orange is one that left me deeply contemplative and to say it didn't affect me would be a lie. Burgess' entrancing playfulness with language and the detailed horrific mistreatment undergone by his protagonist provides a haunting dichotomy that lingers with the reader as they near its final pages and leaves them pondering many sociological ideas, truly exploring the limits of human morality and what it means to make a choice.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Police brutality, Sexual violence, Suicide, Murder, Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, Rape, Torture, Violence, Blood, and Medical content
theodoreeeeeeads's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
What a horrorshow vetsch. Lots ittying on with krovvy scenes and gullivers spinning physically and metaphorically, I defo smecked a malenky whilst viddying the pages. A tolchock in the yarbles when it got intense but I do recommend it to all the lewdies!! (this is what the whole book is like hehehe)
Now returning from the Nadsat language to English, wowowoeeee what a book, well-written, thought provoking, funny at moments and with a fantastic plot. The story poses lots of moral dilemmas and philosophical questions.
It’s terrifically dark, the phrase “ultra-violence”, as used many times in reference to gang activities, is very accurate.
Easy to read classic (except the whole new language lol). Would massively recommend.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Suicide, Suicide attempt, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, Vomit, Blood, Child abuse, Death, Forced institutionalization, Gore, Murder, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Body horror, Medical trauma, Pedophilia, Police brutality, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, Physical abuse, Rape, and Torture
pt_barnum's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This is easily one of my all-time favorites. It's about nihilism, anarchy, and moral philosophy, all told through the perspective of an ultra-violent psychopath who changes drastically throughout the book. It's truly one of the greatest glimpses into the darkness of the human psyche ever put to page.
The gimmick of ACO is that contains a lot of non-english words, specifically a lot of Russian and Russian-influenced-yet-still-made-up slang, like the word "girl" is rarely used in the book, but the term "devotchka" is used in abundance. This is the biggest barrier to getting into the book, as you have to flip to the appendix to learn every new word. While somewhat frustrating at first, it makes it so much more fun to read once you get the hang of it (I was able to read without the appendix about a third into the book). It makes you connect with the setting so much more as it adds another layer of immersion. Just read it if you can get past all the red flags mentioned below, at least so you can brag that you did.
The gimmick of ACO is that contains a lot of non-english words, specifically a lot of Russian and Russian-influenced-yet-still-made-up slang, like the word "girl" is rarely used in the book, but the term "devotchka" is used in abundance. This is the biggest barrier to getting into the book, as you have to flip to the appendix to learn every new word. While somewhat frustrating at first, it makes it so much more fun to read once you get the hang of it (I was able to read without the appendix about a third into the book). It makes you connect with the setting so much more as it adds another layer of immersion. Just read it if you can get past all the red flags mentioned below, at least so you can brag that you did.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content, Gore, Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, Death, Murder, Body horror, Rape, Cursing, Forced institutionalization, Emotional abuse, Sexual assault, Mental illness, Sexual violence, Blood, Drug use, Drug abuse, and Sexual harassment
cjfooks's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
You know what, I actually enjoyed this. I got to say - I wasn’t expecting to.
It was one of those books I wanted to read to say I’d read it and to watch the movie, which I know is a cult classic (although tbh I don’t feel the need now). The only other thing I knew about it going in, was that it was very graphically violent - and wow it definitely is, but not in the way you’d expect.
It was one of those books I wanted to read to say I’d read it and to watch the movie, which I know is a cult classic (although tbh I don’t feel the need now). The only other thing I knew about it going in, was that it was very graphically violent - and wow it definitely is, but not in the way you’d expect.
Firstly, the first part is quite confusing because by this point, not only are you still trying to understand the book’s world and meet characters, but the language is actually its own unique dialect of English.
They mention it at some point, but it’s the young people slang of this fictional world and includes a lot of Russian-derived words in place of English ones. This means most commonly used nouns and verbs are totally incoherent at the start. But towards the middle and end I actually really enjoyed this part of it and now, after reading, sort of miss listening to it, in the way you might miss hearing an Irishmen speak after visiting Ireland for a week.
I’m also really glad I read it for the first time as an audiobook for this reason - I think I understood it quicker and better this way.
When it comes to all the violence though, it’s dampened considerably by the language factor in a very clever way, never using the words like ‘r*pe’, ‘screaming/crying’ or ‘bl**d’ instead ‘the ol’ in-out-in-out’, ‘screeching’ and ‘krovvy’. Between this and the matter-of-a-fact narration about atrocities from Alex (the main character) i think the point here is to try and make the reader read in Alex’s detached perspective, instead of their own.
The language does change throughout the book and, man the way it’s written is so a unique, that I can’t help but respect the heck out of it (which is also why I don’t think the movie could ever do it justice).
Once Alex goes through ‘rehab’, the language he hears and starts using, changes to the ‘ugly’ words we’re used to (I.e. r*pe, etc.) and, this, combined with Alex’s correlated nausea, makes the impact of the violence that much stronger.
The language does change throughout the book and, man the way it’s written is so a unique, that I can’t help but respect the heck out of it (which is also why I don’t think the movie could ever do it justice).
In terms of plot, it’s heavily a character development, rather than plot. And seems to be making some sort of a point but I’ll admit - I still don’t really get it.
To me overall, it’s a cleverly written story about morality, cruelty, karma and a very clever use of language.
To me overall, it’s a cleverly written story about morality, cruelty, karma and a very clever use of language.
I wasn’t expecting to say I’d read this again but I think I would - and would recommend it in certain cases - but only for horror fans (though I wouldn’t actually call this horror) who can stomach a lot of violence in books.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Grief, Kidnapping, Misogyny, Animal death, Drug use, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, Mental illness, Torture, Violence, Sexual violence, Physical abuse, Death, Forced institutionalization, Murder, and Rape
gall_y's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
fast-paced
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence, Sexual assault, Rape, Suicide attempt, Torture, Sexual violence, Physical abuse, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
_sophahs_'s review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Not an enjoyable read but an important one.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug use, Emotional abuse, Sexual violence, Suicide attempt, Physical abuse, Suicide, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Death, Forced institutionalization, Injury/Injury detail, Murder, Rape, Sexual assault, Torture, and Violence
shoohoob's review
dark
emotional
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
I definitely should have read this instead of listened, but the audiobook narrator kinda ate
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Death, Gun violence, Suicidal thoughts, Alcohol, Injury/Injury detail, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Rape, Police brutality, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Drug use, Gore, Hate crime, Murder, Sexual assault, Suicide attempt, Physical abuse, Torture, and Toxic friendship
alext8086's review against another edition
challenging
dark
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
I felt like the slang language the main character uses is a bit over the top. I also feel like most of the book is just him doing awful things. I love the second half of the book, though, when he doesn’t get to be an absolute villain all the time. When he is just being his normal awful self, I did not love the book
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Animal cruelty, Antisemitism, Blood, Bullying, Police brutality, Sexism, Sexual content, Violence, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Animal death, Rape, Child abuse, Death, Forced institutionalization, Injury/Injury detail, Self harm, Suicide attempt, Confinement, Drug use, Murder, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, and Vomit
becandthebooks's review against another edition
4.0
"What's it going to be then, eh?"
I can understand how this book has divided readers throughout its time. This was the first Classics Readalong that I'm hosting with my friend Sam for 2024 and, oh my brothers, did it divided the group. Not in a bad way, but what an interesting discussion we all had. Some finished it and enjoyed it like myself, some DNF'ed it and the majority were on the fence with the general consensus being "it gave me the ick... but it is one of the most impressive pieces of literature" (as quoted by @exlibris_emily).
During Part 1 we are introduced to our narrator Alex who, along with his teenage friends, loves to go out at night partaking in "ultra -violence" - beating, stealing, bribing, raping, even murder. The language that Burgess has created within these pages, Nasdat, really helps to read through these horrifying ordeals, it almost creates a sense of putting it at arms length, you know what you are reading, but its not as graphic as what it would be in a normal language. Nasdat also helps to create a sense of the dystopian world we are visiting, dark, grungy and unsafe. "It's a stinking world because it lets the young get on to the old like you done, and there's no law and order no more."
During Part 2 we are with our self-proclaimed 'humble' narrator whilst he is in prison for a couple of years and ends up being the guinea pig for a new rehabilitation program designed to cause illness and stress whenever violence occurs and in turn take pressure of the criminal system. He is held down with his eyes pinned open and forced to watch "ultra-violence" on a screen while listening to classical music, which just so happens to be his favourite type of music. This, in turn, also destroys the enjoyment of the thing he appreciates the most. "Horrorshow is right, friend. A real show of horrors."
As we move into Part 3 Alex is out of the program and attempting to find his place again in society. He ends up with a political party that want to use him for their plight. "To turn a decent young man into a piece of clockwork should not, surely, be seen as any triumph." He accidentally helps them out by a whim-of-the-moment choice and at the same time accidentally cures himself of the illness he feels when he comes into contact with violence, violent thoughts or Beethoven.
Will he go back to his old ways, or will he end up on the straight and narrow after all of his punishments?
"And all it was was that I was young."
I've never read anything like "A Clockwork Orange" before. I started off reading it with a Nasdat dictionary in one hand and the book in the other. Once I was through Part 1 I put the dictionary down and just went with the flow. It took a lot of concentration and for such a short book felt like a lengthy undertaking. Having said all of that, once I got into the flow I enjoyed the challenge and I can see how it has become a classic. It's so unique and it would have also been breaching on taboo subjects with the actions and mindsets the main characters demonstrate.
I can understand how this book has divided readers throughout its time. This was the first Classics Readalong that I'm hosting with my friend Sam for 2024 and, oh my brothers, did it divided the group. Not in a bad way, but what an interesting discussion we all had. Some finished it and enjoyed it like myself, some DNF'ed it and the majority were on the fence with the general consensus being "it gave me the ick... but it is one of the most impressive pieces of literature" (as quoted by @exlibris_emily).
During Part 1 we are introduced to our narrator Alex who, along with his teenage friends, loves to go out at night partaking in "ultra -violence" - beating, stealing, bribing, raping, even murder. The language that Burgess has created within these pages, Nasdat, really helps to read through these horrifying ordeals, it almost creates a sense of putting it at arms length, you know what you are reading, but its not as graphic as what it would be in a normal language. Nasdat also helps to create a sense of the dystopian world we are visiting, dark, grungy and unsafe. "It's a stinking world because it lets the young get on to the old like you done, and there's no law and order no more."
During Part 2 we are with our self-proclaimed 'humble' narrator whilst he is in prison for a couple of years and ends up being the guinea pig for a new rehabilitation program designed to cause illness and stress whenever violence occurs and in turn take pressure of the criminal system. He is held down with his eyes pinned open and forced to watch "ultra-violence" on a screen while listening to classical music, which just so happens to be his favourite type of music. This, in turn, also destroys the enjoyment of the thing he appreciates the most. "Horrorshow is right, friend. A real show of horrors."
As we move into Part 3 Alex is out of the program and attempting to find his place again in society. He ends up with a political party that want to use him for their plight. "To turn a decent young man into a piece of clockwork should not, surely, be seen as any triumph." He accidentally helps them out by a whim-of-the-moment choice and at the same time accidentally cures himself of the illness he feels when he comes into contact with violence, violent thoughts or Beethoven.
Will he go back to his old ways, or will he end up on the straight and narrow after all of his punishments?
"And all it was was that I was young."
I've never read anything like "A Clockwork Orange" before. I started off reading it with a Nasdat dictionary in one hand and the book in the other. Once I was through Part 1 I put the dictionary down and just went with the flow. It took a lot of concentration and for such a short book felt like a lengthy undertaking. Having said all of that, once I got into the flow I enjoyed the challenge and I can see how it has become a classic. It's so unique and it would have also been breaching on taboo subjects with the actions and mindsets the main characters demonstrate.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Injury/Injury detail, Rape, Sexual violence, Death, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, Police brutality, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide attempt, Violence, Drug use, Emotional abuse, and Gore
greenan26's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Blood, Death, Forced institutionalization, Gore, Injury/Injury detail, Mental illness, Misogyny, Violence, Sexual harassment, and Sexual violence
Moderate: Pedophilia, Police brutality, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide attempt, Torture, and Medical trauma
Minor: Vomit, Antisemitism, and Racial slurs