Scan barcode
cviii's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Body horror, Car accident, Violence, War, Classism, Gun violence, Islamophobia, Mass/school shootings, Colonisation, Death, Dementia, Gore, Grief, Murder, Police brutality, Religious bigotry, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Xenophobia and Stalking
annemaries_shelves's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
As a retelling of Frankenstein and its philosophy - who is the monster, what does it mean to be a person and to purse justice, how do you reconcile your past with your future, the balance of nature vs nurture - Frankenstein in Baghdad did a good job.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
Content Warnings
Graphic: War, Gore, Gun violence, Fire/Fire injury, Car accident, Grief, Violence, Blood, Body horror, Death, Torture, Murder, Police brutality, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Sexual harassment
directorpurry's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Torture, Vomit, Violence, Death, Police brutality, Murder, and War
Moderate: Animal death and Body horror
Minor: Child death and Mass/school shootings
mengzhenreads's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I really loved the concept and execution of this book, it was horrifying and thought-provoking and just a great exploration of the logic of violence and vengeance. This was definitely a difficult read but it was absolutely worth it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Violence, and War
Moderate: Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Police brutality, and Torture
Minor: Alcoholism, Blood, and Kidnapping
sophee_568's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Let's start by saying that I have no idea how to rate this book. This was a challenging read because of the amount of violence and death. I am aware this book was purposefully written and it was a clever choice to convey the story through the known tale of Frankenstein and his monster. Essentially, this is a story about death, the meaning of justice, how different people view it, how they put it into effect, and the differences between innocence and guilt. Who has the right to decide what is wrong or right, or who is innocent and who is a criminal?
The story takes place in U.S.-occupied Baghdad. The story follows a cast of Baghdad citizens showing how they navigate a city torn by bomb explosions. It shows the growing disparities between Sunnis and Shiites paramilitary troops and the American military troops trying and ultimately failing to bring peace into the city. One of the characters is Hadi, a scavenger who spends most of his time at a local cafe telling stories about his life to anyone willing to listen. Hadi is the Frankenstein of this novel but an accidental one. He collected body parts of the bombing victims and stitched them together to form one whole body, which resided in his shed. What brought it to life was a wondering lost soul who needed a body. It rose from the table and fled into the night. From then on Hadi's creation, called Whatsitsname or Criminal X, decided his mission was to avenge the death of people whose body parts formed his. That mission turned out to be more difficult than it seemed because every time he avenged a person or failed to do so, the body parts started to fall off. That propelled him to constantly look for more body parts, which led him to start murdering innocent people. That's where the innocent vs. guilty debate comes in. How can you know if someone is innocent or not when you see them on the street? If you witness a shoot-out on the street you may think they are criminals, guilty of murder, but that label might only fit at that moment. Before that, couldn't they have been innocent people, leading ordinary lives, who were forced to engage in combat? Who is the real enemy? That is a nerve-wracking topic to explore. As Saadawi said in an interview: "The book is a manifesto against war. It is critical of the American occupation, the former regime, and the current regime." I think the main idea was for the reader to see how senseless and pointless war is.
All the characters in this story come from different ethnic and religious backgrounds but face the same problem of staying alive. They have all been traumatized by war. Elishva lost her son in battle, and Hadi lost his best friend to a bomb explosion. It is a horrible and scary life to live. By the end, many characters will have either died or moved away. Unfortunately, I didn't find myself emotionally invested in the story. Perhaps that is due to the number of characters or the constant switching of POV between the characters. The book is divided into 19 chapters, every chapter having 5 parts. I thought each chapter was going to follow only one character, but after the 5th chapter POVs were constantly switching. I would have preferred for the chapters to have only one POV.
One thing that bothered me was the lack of female characters. Elishva is the only female main character, and she is portrayed as 'crazy' because she cannot deal with her son's death. The way Mahmoud (also one of the main characters) thinks about and treats Nawal is awful. He seemed like a decent character until he forced himself on her. Not to mention the way he treated the prostitute he was with. Those instances made me feel uneasy.
Overall I am giving this book 3 stars because I wasn't that impressed with the execution of the novel. I probably won't read it ever again.
The story takes place in U.S.-occupied Baghdad. The story follows a cast of Baghdad citizens showing how they navigate a city torn by bomb explosions. It shows the growing disparities between Sunnis and Shiites paramilitary troops and the American military troops trying and ultimately failing to bring peace into the city. One of the characters is Hadi, a scavenger who spends most of his time at a local cafe telling stories about his life to anyone willing to listen. Hadi is the Frankenstein of this novel but an accidental one. He collected body parts of the bombing victims and stitched them together to form one whole body, which resided in his shed. What brought it to life was a wondering lost soul who needed a body. It rose from the table and fled into the night. From then on Hadi's creation, called Whatsitsname or Criminal X, decided his mission was to avenge the death of people whose body parts formed his. That mission turned out to be more difficult than it seemed because every time he avenged a person or failed to do so, the body parts started to fall off. That propelled him to constantly look for more body parts, which led him to start murdering innocent people. That's where the innocent vs. guilty debate comes in. How can you know if someone is innocent or not when you see them on the street? If you witness a shoot-out on the street you may think they are criminals, guilty of murder, but that label might only fit at that moment. Before that, couldn't they have been innocent people, leading ordinary lives, who were forced to engage in combat? Who is the real enemy? That is a nerve-wracking topic to explore. As Saadawi said in an interview: "The book is a manifesto against war. It is critical of the American occupation, the former regime, and the current regime." I think the main idea was for the reader to see how senseless and pointless war is.
All the characters in this story come from different ethnic and religious backgrounds but face the same problem of staying alive. They have all been traumatized by war. Elishva lost her son in battle, and Hadi lost his best friend to a bomb explosion. It is a horrible and scary life to live. By the end, many characters will have either died or moved away. Unfortunately, I didn't find myself emotionally invested in the story. Perhaps that is due to the number of characters or the constant switching of POV between the characters. The book is divided into 19 chapters, every chapter having 5 parts. I thought each chapter was going to follow only one character, but after the 5th chapter POVs were constantly switching. I would have preferred for the chapters to have only one POV.
One thing that bothered me was the lack of female characters. Elishva is the only female main character, and she is portrayed as 'crazy' because she cannot deal with her son's death. The way Mahmoud (also one of the main characters) thinks about and treats Nawal is awful. He seemed like a decent character until he forced himself on her. Not to mention the way he treated the prostitute he was with. Those instances made me feel uneasy.
Overall I am giving this book 3 stars because I wasn't that impressed with the execution of the novel. I probably won't read it ever again.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, War, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcohol
mme_carton's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Grief, Injury/Injury detail, Mass/school shootings, Misogyny, Police brutality, Sexism, Blood, Body horror, Child death, Death, Death of parent, Gore, Medical content, Gun violence, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Toxic friendship, Toxic relationship, Violence, War, Sexual assault, Religious bigotry, and Torture
Moderate: Cursing and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Animal cruelty
ryster's review against another edition
4.25
I adored this book! It's well-told, with different, but very interesting perspectives. I didn't care much for the last 20 pages, in which I thought hte book became kind of lost in itself, I see what it was going for, but I just didn't click with that part. Overall though, it was a very enjoyable read, I would definitely recommend it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence and Death
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Death of parent
spinesinaline's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
This book follows the original classic with a murderous creature formed out of multiple corpses. However in Saadawi’s story, these corpses are victims of suicide bombings, the story set in Iran following the USA’s invasion, and the creature sets out to seek justice for these parts of it’s self.
While the author doesn’t directly comment on foreign conflicts and warring governments, we see the horrific impacts of this violence on each character in the book and the larger implications and realizations are subtly pushed forward throughout the story for the reader to come to on their own.
Because of this more subtle undertone, it does feel that the descriptions of death and destruction are at times callous or impartial but I think the author’s intentions and style work beautifully in getting his point across.
While the author doesn’t directly comment on foreign conflicts and warring governments, we see the horrific impacts of this violence on each character in the book and the larger implications and realizations are subtly pushed forward throughout the story for the reader to come to on their own.
Because of this more subtle undertone, it does feel that the descriptions of death and destruction are at times callous or impartial but I think the author’s intentions and style work beautifully in getting his point across.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Suicide, War, Death, Murder, Gun violence, Violence, Gore, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Sexual content
savvylit's review against another edition
dark
informative
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
More of a political commentary than a horror story, Frankenstein in Baghdad was a fascinating glimpse into post-Hussein Iraq. The story was engaging for two distinct reasons: (1) the literal setting and (2) the multiple points of view. By including the perspective of multiple residents of Baghdad, Saadawi demonstrates how an entire community experiences daily violence and trauma. Each character has suffered immense loss and been witness to unfathomable brutality. Many of the characters have also resigned themselves to daily danger and are unsurprised to be nearly killed.
The multi-character narration is also what conjures the powerful setting. Saadawi portrays a Baghdad that has been utterly destroyed by the U.S. invasion. Not only that, but he also demonstrates the resulting corruption and in-fighting that went hand-in-hand with the invasion. Baghdad is in ruins, no one can be trusted, and the streets are littered with corpses. Residents are fleeing to the countryside or leaving Iraq entirely. The glimpses of the true reality of senseless modern war in this novel are incredibly sobering.
All that being said, I ultimately felt neutral upon finishing Frankenstein in Baghdad. I think perhaps some of the dark humor that has been ascribed to this book fell flat for me, personally. Maybe it is an issue of translation or just general cultural differences. I'm not sure. I definitely got that some of the bureaucrats featured were exaggerated caricatures of real officials. However, I didn't actually experience comedy. Also, the portrayal of women in this novel is pretty terrible. Elishva is pitiful & disrespected and the way that Mahmoud acts around Nawal near the book's end is gross.
The multi-character narration is also what conjures the powerful setting. Saadawi portrays a Baghdad that has been utterly destroyed by the U.S. invasion. Not only that, but he also demonstrates the resulting corruption and in-fighting that went hand-in-hand with the invasion. Baghdad is in ruins, no one can be trusted, and the streets are littered with corpses. Residents are fleeing to the countryside or leaving Iraq entirely. The glimpses of the true reality of senseless modern war in this novel are incredibly sobering.
All that being said, I ultimately felt neutral upon finishing Frankenstein in Baghdad. I think perhaps some of the dark humor that has been ascribed to this book fell flat for me, personally. Maybe it is an issue of translation or just general cultural differences. I'm not sure. I definitely got that some of the bureaucrats featured were exaggerated caricatures of real officials. However, I didn't actually experience comedy. Also, the portrayal of women in this novel is pretty terrible. Elishva is pitiful & disrespected and the way that Mahmoud acts around Nawal near the book's end is gross.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail, Murder, Death, Body horror, Gore, Gun violence, Grief, War, Physical abuse, Violence, Suicide, Police brutality, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Misogyny and Sexual harassment
books_n_pickles's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
First off, know that this is not a straight-up <i>Frankenstein</i> retelling. It's not sci-fi lite: rather, Saadawi took the idea of Frankenstein's creation, and pulls a ship of Theseus with it--which is highly fitting, as you'll see in my spoiler-y description.
Saadawi has a lot of characters on the board here, and the book includes a handy list of them at the front to help you keep track. I absolutely love books chock-full of memorable characters, and Saadawi definitely delivers.
Like Mary Shelley, Saadawi structures his story in layers. We begin with a top-secret notice about this book and the activities of a government organization known as the Pursuit and Tracking Division. Apparently the division should be disbanded, the story destroyed, and the author <i>re</i>arrested. We hear the story itself as assembled by the nameless author, who is building on the work of disgraced young journalist Mahmoud al-Sawadi, who heard the story from a charismatic junk dealer.
I'm about to write a description that will refresh my memory in the future; pieces of the story not learned until late in the book will be included. Quit while you're ahead if you don't want the story to be spoiled.
Junk dealer Hadi is dismayed to discover, while identifying the remains of a friend, that when a person is killed by a blast from a bomb, not every piece of every body is retrieved. He decides that in addition to junk for resale, he will gather abandoned pieces of people, assembling them into a single body that may be given a proper burial.
What he does not expect his that his next door neighbor, a very old Christian woman named Elishva, will see in the body the miracle that she has begged from Saint George for years: the return of her beloved son Daniel, who was disappeared years earlier. She calls to this creation just as the spirit of a man freshly killed in a suicide attack finds the soulless body, and between Hadi's work and her call, the creature comes to life. Okay, so he doesn't look much like Daniel, but Elishva knows better than to question a miracle.
But he does not stay to comfort the woman in her old age. Instead, he is compelled to enact revenge on those who murdered the people whose components make up his body. Garrulous Hadi shares his insider knowledge of the murderer striking the city seemingly at random, though of course it's too wild a tale for any visitors to the local coffee shop to believe...except for Mahmoud, who convinces Hadi to take a recorder to Daniel so that he can tell his own story.
And what a story! Unlike Shelley's creation, Daniel has accumulated followers and factions, who see him as the ultimate Iraqi, a herald of a savior, and a savior himself. He also has a serious problem: if he kills someone or takes too long to do so, the part of his body associated with that victim starts to decay, and requires replacement. As he and his advisors try to decide how to handle this revelation, he begins to question just what makes someone a victim or a perpetrator in the first place.
The title of Mahmoud's expose based on Daniel's confessions gives its name to the title of the book. The article attracts the attention of the shady Pursuit and Tracking Division, which employs seers to identify threats both real and supernatural so that the government can thwart them or use them. The head of the division sees the capture of Daniel as his ticket to a cushier job, but his seers have very different opinions of what they should do when they locate the murderer.
Quite outside of Daniel's influence, several characters find their established ways of living coming apart at the seams. We come full circle back to the nameless author mentioned in the opening report, who takes over the story that Mahmoud abandons, only to come to the attention of the Pursuit and Tracking Division.
If that sounds like a lot, it is. The sprawling, diverse cast of characters includes Algerian immigrants, an Armenian family, country folks drawn to the city for opportunity, and city folks driven to the countryside and out of the country altogether for fear of their physical and political safety. Shady real estate dealers and suave editors rub elbows with good-hearted coffee shop owners, failing hoteliers, and exhausted priests; Christian families live in formerly Jewish mansions while old Baghdad families support and envy each other in turns; American forces barrel through the neighborhood with impunity; and independent female artists get lost in this male-dominated story. It's quite a collection, displaying a cross-section of a rich city slowly being destroyed by bombs, gangs, meddling foreigners, revenge, and greed.
What a book! I feel bad that it was probably only my emotional state at the time I read this that kept me from enjoying it fully. It's hard to convey more than the plot, because a major strength of this book was Saadawi's ability to build small scenes that help build human characters with unrealized emotional depth (as when a real estate broker full of confidence and bluster becomes a terrified shadow of himself in the face of unpredictable American soldiers) or make you realize that even a journalist main character isn't as reliable as you thought (as when Mahmoud finally meets the woman he's been fantasizing about for months and swings, on no evidence, from seeing her as a whore to an ideal to a slut to a victim of unwanted attention to an opportunist to an object of his own unwanted attention). There's a lot to the plot, but it's these small scenes and their fascinating characters, and the universal humanity of big questions in what may appear to be simple situations, that make <i>Frankenstein in Baghdad</i> a standout.
<b>Quotes</b>
<i>(I had a ton, but I winnowed them down. I'm not totally sure why I settled on only these two:</i>
p. 60) <i>Elishva promises God that if something bad happens to the man who betrayed her son, she will (do something special that I forgot because I'm reviewing this book after reading two others) in his honor.</i>
Having adopted many of the customs of the neighborhood, Elishva saw it as a vow she was now fulfilling, although Father Josiah always corrected her.
"We don't set conditions for the Lord, as Muslims do," he would say. "We don't say, 'If You do this, then I'll do that."
Elishva knew what he meant, of course, but she saw no harm in setting conditions for God, as Umm Salim and her other Muslim neighbors did. She didn't see the Lord in quite the same way as Father Josiah did. The Lord wasn't "in the highest"; she didn't see him as domineering or tyrannical. He was just an old friend, and it would be hard to abandon that friendship.
p. 123) <i>A debate occurs on a talk show about who is responsible for instigating a mass panic and subsequent deaths in Baghdad.</i>
"Honestly, I think everyone was responsible in one way or another. I'd go further and say that all the security incidents and the tragedies we're seeing stem from one thing--fear. The people on the bridge died because they were frightened of dying. Every day we're dying from the same fear of dying. The groups that have given shelter and support to al-Qaeda have done so because they are frightened of another group, and this other group has created and mobilized militias to protect itself from al-Qaeda. It has created a death machine working in the other direction because it's afraid of the Other. And we're going to see more and more death because of fear. The government and the occupation forces have to eliminate fear. They must put a stop to it if they really want this cycle of killing to end."
Saadawi has a lot of characters on the board here, and the book includes a handy list of them at the front to help you keep track. I absolutely love books chock-full of memorable characters, and Saadawi definitely delivers.
Like Mary Shelley, Saadawi structures his story in layers. We begin with a top-secret notice about this book and the activities of a government organization known as the Pursuit and Tracking Division. Apparently the division should be disbanded, the story destroyed, and the author <i>re</i>arrested. We hear the story itself as assembled by the nameless author, who is building on the work of disgraced young journalist Mahmoud al-Sawadi, who heard the story from a charismatic junk dealer.
I'm about to write a description that will refresh my memory in the future; pieces of the story not learned until late in the book will be included. Quit while you're ahead if you don't want the story to be spoiled.
Junk dealer Hadi is dismayed to discover, while identifying the remains of a friend, that when a person is killed by a blast from a bomb, not every piece of every body is retrieved. He decides that in addition to junk for resale, he will gather abandoned pieces of people, assembling them into a single body that may be given a proper burial.
What he does not expect his that his next door neighbor, a very old Christian woman named Elishva, will see in the body the miracle that she has begged from Saint George for years: the return of her beloved son Daniel, who was disappeared years earlier. She calls to this creation just as the spirit of a man freshly killed in a suicide attack finds the soulless body, and between Hadi's work and her call, the creature comes to life. Okay, so he doesn't look much like Daniel, but Elishva knows better than to question a miracle.
But he does not stay to comfort the woman in her old age. Instead, he is compelled to enact revenge on those who murdered the people whose components make up his body. Garrulous Hadi shares his insider knowledge of the murderer striking the city seemingly at random, though of course it's too wild a tale for any visitors to the local coffee shop to believe...except for Mahmoud, who convinces Hadi to take a recorder to Daniel so that he can tell his own story.
And what a story! Unlike Shelley's creation, Daniel has accumulated followers and factions, who see him as the ultimate Iraqi, a herald of a savior, and a savior himself. He also has a serious problem: if he kills someone or takes too long to do so, the part of his body associated with that victim starts to decay, and requires replacement. As he and his advisors try to decide how to handle this revelation, he begins to question just what makes someone a victim or a perpetrator in the first place.
The title of Mahmoud's expose based on Daniel's confessions gives its name to the title of the book. The article attracts the attention of the shady Pursuit and Tracking Division, which employs seers to identify threats both real and supernatural so that the government can thwart them or use them. The head of the division sees the capture of Daniel as his ticket to a cushier job, but his seers have very different opinions of what they should do when they locate the murderer.
Quite outside of Daniel's influence, several characters find their established ways of living coming apart at the seams. We come full circle back to the nameless author mentioned in the opening report, who takes over the story that Mahmoud abandons, only to come to the attention of the Pursuit and Tracking Division.
If that sounds like a lot, it is. The sprawling, diverse cast of characters includes Algerian immigrants, an Armenian family, country folks drawn to the city for opportunity, and city folks driven to the countryside and out of the country altogether for fear of their physical and political safety. Shady real estate dealers and suave editors rub elbows with good-hearted coffee shop owners, failing hoteliers, and exhausted priests; Christian families live in formerly Jewish mansions while old Baghdad families support and envy each other in turns; American forces barrel through the neighborhood with impunity; and independent female artists get lost in this male-dominated story. It's quite a collection, displaying a cross-section of a rich city slowly being destroyed by bombs, gangs, meddling foreigners, revenge, and greed.
What a book! I feel bad that it was probably only my emotional state at the time I read this that kept me from enjoying it fully. It's hard to convey more than the plot, because a major strength of this book was Saadawi's ability to build small scenes that help build human characters with unrealized emotional depth (as when a real estate broker full of confidence and bluster becomes a terrified shadow of himself in the face of unpredictable American soldiers) or make you realize that even a journalist main character isn't as reliable as you thought (as when Mahmoud finally meets the woman he's been fantasizing about for months and swings, on no evidence, from seeing her as a whore to an ideal to a slut to a victim of unwanted attention to an opportunist to an object of his own unwanted attention). There's a lot to the plot, but it's these small scenes and their fascinating characters, and the universal humanity of big questions in what may appear to be simple situations, that make <i>Frankenstein in Baghdad</i> a standout.
<b>Quotes</b>
<i>(I had a ton, but I winnowed them down. I'm not totally sure why I settled on only these two:</i>
p. 60) <i>Elishva promises God that if something bad happens to the man who betrayed her son, she will (do something special that I forgot because I'm reviewing this book after reading two others) in his honor.</i>
Having adopted many of the customs of the neighborhood, Elishva saw it as a vow she was now fulfilling, although Father Josiah always corrected her.
"We don't set conditions for the Lord, as Muslims do," he would say. "We don't say, 'If You do this, then I'll do that."
Elishva knew what he meant, of course, but she saw no harm in setting conditions for God, as Umm Salim and her other Muslim neighbors did. She didn't see the Lord in quite the same way as Father Josiah did. The Lord wasn't "in the highest"; she didn't see him as domineering or tyrannical. He was just an old friend, and it would be hard to abandon that friendship.
p. 123) <i>A debate occurs on a talk show about who is responsible for instigating a mass panic and subsequent deaths in Baghdad.</i>
"Honestly, I think everyone was responsible in one way or another. I'd go further and say that all the security incidents and the tragedies we're seeing stem from one thing--fear. The people on the bridge died because they were frightened of dying. Every day we're dying from the same fear of dying. The groups that have given shelter and support to al-Qaeda have done so because they are frightened of another group, and this other group has created and mobilized militias to protect itself from al-Qaeda. It has created a death machine working in the other direction because it's afraid of the Other. And we're going to see more and more death because of fear. The government and the occupation forces have to eliminate fear. They must put a stop to it if they really want this cycle of killing to end."
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Violence, and Sexism