Scan barcode
toffishay's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is one of my favorite books of all time and I am so intrigued by how stories that we know can be reimagined and adapted to analyze different fears and different times with different actors. In the case of Frankenstein in Baghdad, the tale of a Frankenstein monster is not used to expose fears of science and paternalism, but of exploring violence and the impacts of war, religion and spirituality, and identity and purpose. All that I didn't like was that I would have liked more exploration of the female characters who have interesting stories, but not as much time on the page and some characters get a lot of time, but little payoff. I think that if you are interested in horror and a reimagined classic, this is certainly worth your time.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Alcoholism, Blood, Alcohol, Body horror, Murder, Police brutality, Violence, War, and Physical abuse
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury, Gun violence, Mental illness, Sexual content, Torture, Vomit, Gaslighting, Gore, Medical content, and Stalking
Minor: Excrement and Religious bigotry
cviii's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Body horror, Car accident, Violence, War, Classism, Gun violence, Islamophobia, Mass/school shootings, Colonisation, Death, Dementia, Gore, Grief, Murder, Police brutality, Religious bigotry, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Xenophobia and Stalking
annemaries_shelves's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
As a retelling of Frankenstein and its philosophy - who is the monster, what does it mean to be a person and to purse justice, how do you reconcile your past with your future, the balance of nature vs nurture - Frankenstein in Baghdad did a good job.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
Content Warnings
Graphic: War, Gore, Gun violence, Fire/Fire injury, Car accident, Grief, Violence, Blood, Body horror, Death, Torture, Murder, Police brutality, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Sexual harassment
directorpurry's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Torture, Vomit, Violence, Death, Police brutality, Murder, and War
Moderate: Animal death and Body horror
Minor: Child death and Mass/school shootings
mengzhenreads's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I really loved the concept and execution of this book, it was horrifying and thought-provoking and just a great exploration of the logic of violence and vengeance. This was definitely a difficult read but it was absolutely worth it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Violence, and War
Moderate: Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Police brutality, and Torture
Minor: Alcoholism, Blood, and Kidnapping
sophee_568's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Let's start by saying that I have no idea how to rate this book. This was a challenging read because of the amount of violence and death. I am aware this book was purposefully written and it was a clever choice to convey the story through the known tale of Frankenstein and his monster. Essentially, this is a story about death, the meaning of justice, how different people view it, how they put it into effect, and the differences between innocence and guilt. Who has the right to decide what is wrong or right, or who is innocent and who is a criminal?
The story takes place in U.S.-occupied Baghdad. The story follows a cast of Baghdad citizens showing how they navigate a city torn by bomb explosions. It shows the growing disparities between Sunnis and Shiites paramilitary troops and the American military troops trying and ultimately failing to bring peace into the city. One of the characters is Hadi, a scavenger who spends most of his time at a local cafe telling stories about his life to anyone willing to listen. Hadi is the Frankenstein of this novel but an accidental one. He collected body parts of the bombing victims and stitched them together to form one whole body, which resided in his shed. What brought it to life was a wondering lost soul who needed a body. It rose from the table and fled into the night. From then on Hadi's creation, called Whatsitsname or Criminal X, decided his mission was to avenge the death of people whose body parts formed his. That mission turned out to be more difficult than it seemed because every time he avenged a person or failed to do so, the body parts started to fall off. That propelled him to constantly look for more body parts, which led him to start murdering innocent people. That's where the innocent vs. guilty debate comes in. How can you know if someone is innocent or not when you see them on the street? If you witness a shoot-out on the street you may think they are criminals, guilty of murder, but that label might only fit at that moment. Before that, couldn't they have been innocent people, leading ordinary lives, who were forced to engage in combat? Who is the real enemy? That is a nerve-wracking topic to explore. As Saadawi said in an interview: "The book is a manifesto against war. It is critical of the American occupation, the former regime, and the current regime." I think the main idea was for the reader to see how senseless and pointless war is.
All the characters in this story come from different ethnic and religious backgrounds but face the same problem of staying alive. They have all been traumatized by war. Elishva lost her son in battle, and Hadi lost his best friend to a bomb explosion. It is a horrible and scary life to live. By the end, many characters will have either died or moved away. Unfortunately, I didn't find myself emotionally invested in the story. Perhaps that is due to the number of characters or the constant switching of POV between the characters. The book is divided into 19 chapters, every chapter having 5 parts. I thought each chapter was going to follow only one character, but after the 5th chapter POVs were constantly switching. I would have preferred for the chapters to have only one POV.
One thing that bothered me was the lack of female characters. Elishva is the only female main character, and she is portrayed as 'crazy' because she cannot deal with her son's death. The way Mahmoud (also one of the main characters) thinks about and treats Nawal is awful. He seemed like a decent character until he forced himself on her. Not to mention the way he treated the prostitute he was with. Those instances made me feel uneasy.
Overall I am giving this book 3 stars because I wasn't that impressed with the execution of the novel. I probably won't read it ever again.
The story takes place in U.S.-occupied Baghdad. The story follows a cast of Baghdad citizens showing how they navigate a city torn by bomb explosions. It shows the growing disparities between Sunnis and Shiites paramilitary troops and the American military troops trying and ultimately failing to bring peace into the city. One of the characters is Hadi, a scavenger who spends most of his time at a local cafe telling stories about his life to anyone willing to listen. Hadi is the Frankenstein of this novel but an accidental one. He collected body parts of the bombing victims and stitched them together to form one whole body, which resided in his shed. What brought it to life was a wondering lost soul who needed a body. It rose from the table and fled into the night. From then on Hadi's creation, called Whatsitsname or Criminal X, decided his mission was to avenge the death of people whose body parts formed his. That mission turned out to be more difficult than it seemed because every time he avenged a person or failed to do so, the body parts started to fall off. That propelled him to constantly look for more body parts, which led him to start murdering innocent people. That's where the innocent vs. guilty debate comes in. How can you know if someone is innocent or not when you see them on the street? If you witness a shoot-out on the street you may think they are criminals, guilty of murder, but that label might only fit at that moment. Before that, couldn't they have been innocent people, leading ordinary lives, who were forced to engage in combat? Who is the real enemy? That is a nerve-wracking topic to explore. As Saadawi said in an interview: "The book is a manifesto against war. It is critical of the American occupation, the former regime, and the current regime." I think the main idea was for the reader to see how senseless and pointless war is.
All the characters in this story come from different ethnic and religious backgrounds but face the same problem of staying alive. They have all been traumatized by war. Elishva lost her son in battle, and Hadi lost his best friend to a bomb explosion. It is a horrible and scary life to live. By the end, many characters will have either died or moved away. Unfortunately, I didn't find myself emotionally invested in the story. Perhaps that is due to the number of characters or the constant switching of POV between the characters. The book is divided into 19 chapters, every chapter having 5 parts. I thought each chapter was going to follow only one character, but after the 5th chapter POVs were constantly switching. I would have preferred for the chapters to have only one POV.
One thing that bothered me was the lack of female characters. Elishva is the only female main character, and she is portrayed as 'crazy' because she cannot deal with her son's death. The way Mahmoud (also one of the main characters) thinks about and treats Nawal is awful. He seemed like a decent character until he forced himself on her. Not to mention the way he treated the prostitute he was with. Those instances made me feel uneasy.
Overall I am giving this book 3 stars because I wasn't that impressed with the execution of the novel. I probably won't read it ever again.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, War, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcohol
aegireads's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, Gore, Death, Grief, War, and Suicide
mme_carton's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Grief, Injury/Injury detail, Mass/school shootings, Misogyny, Police brutality, Sexism, Blood, Body horror, Child death, Death, Death of parent, Gore, Medical content, Gun violence, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Toxic friendship, Toxic relationship, Violence, War, Sexual assault, Religious bigotry, and Torture
Moderate: Cursing and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Animal cruelty
igafk's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: War
Moderate: Blood, Fire/Fire injury, Grief, Physical abuse, Mass/school shootings, Murder, Police brutality, Sexual content, and Death
spinesinaline's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
This book follows the original classic with a murderous creature formed out of multiple corpses. However in Saadawi’s story, these corpses are victims of suicide bombings, the story set in Iran following the USA’s invasion, and the creature sets out to seek justice for these parts of it’s self.
While the author doesn’t directly comment on foreign conflicts and warring governments, we see the horrific impacts of this violence on each character in the book and the larger implications and realizations are subtly pushed forward throughout the story for the reader to come to on their own.
Because of this more subtle undertone, it does feel that the descriptions of death and destruction are at times callous or impartial but I think the author’s intentions and style work beautifully in getting his point across.
While the author doesn’t directly comment on foreign conflicts and warring governments, we see the horrific impacts of this violence on each character in the book and the larger implications and realizations are subtly pushed forward throughout the story for the reader to come to on their own.
Because of this more subtle undertone, it does feel that the descriptions of death and destruction are at times callous or impartial but I think the author’s intentions and style work beautifully in getting his point across.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Suicide, War, Death, Murder, Gun violence, Violence, Gore, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Sexual content