4.03 AVERAGE


I haven't read this for years, but watching the movie version last weekend with my son made me want to look at the book again. As I read, I marveled anew at Clarke's accuracy in imagining 33 years in the future. Things like reading newspapers on a tablet, swiping a credit card to make a phone call, video phone calls, and many other little details are all just about right, even if his predictions about manned space travel were not quite right. I liked this line: "The more wonderful the means of communication, the more trivial, tawdry or depressing its contents seemed to be" (68). How true that seems today, with the constant flow of mindless information available online (of which I suppose this review is a part...).

One Small Step Towards Humanity, by Adam Rabalais

What I don't like about the book is the kind of pedantic voice that's always calling attention to things and explaining what things are and how they work. The author's voice is not comfortable just letting the story be a story; instead, it's more like a guided tour of 2001. Because the book is connected to the movie, it's okay in this case, with the book being almost an "extra feature" to fill in some of the gaps that the movie leaves unexplained. But just as a book, it doesn't work so well for me. I don't read much sci-fi, so I don't know if this is the way good sci-fi novels are written. Maybe so, and maybe I'm thus not much of a sci-fi person.

I Can Feel It, by Raid71

I enjoy 2001 because of the uniqueness of the movie/book collaboration, among other things. I enjoy both, though I think the movie is a better movie than the book is a book; and I definitely enjoy the book mostly because of its connection to the amazing film.

My reviews of the other books in the series:

2010: Odyssey Two
2061: Odyssey Three
3001: The Final Odyssey

What is there to say about 2001 that hasn't already been written? Clarke's mad experiment with Stanley Kubrick is hard science fiction at its finest--just as plausible and disconcerting in 2021 as it was in 1968.

3.5 Stars: Maybe a little too mind-bending
adventurous challenging dark hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous challenging tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: N/A
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Okay, this was a good read. I have seen the film, but the film was a bit boring.

The ending is great. And just for the monolith adn the ending this gets 4 stars.
adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous medium-paced

Story time! This is the second time I have read this book, but the third time I have read the first 24 pages. The first copy of this book that i owned had two copies of page 24 and no copy of page 25. Me being the stubborn person that I am (and having had several other books in reserve on that weekend trip), I decided that I would not read the book until I had a proper copy.

I enjoy reading Clarke because he is so good at describing things. Yes, his description of what we now call the Internet is quaint and the gender roles in the book infuriating if you think about it too hard (as one of the essays in my current book, She's Such a Geek put it, if he can imagine technologically advanced space ships and alien societies, why can't he imagine female astronauts?), but his descriptions are marvelous.

Trippy.