Take a photo of a barcode or cover
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Drug use, Gore, Hate crime, Homophobia, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Torture, Violence, Blood, Kidnapping, Cannibalism, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Alcohol, Injury/Injury detail, Classism
Moderate: Ableism, Bullying, Infidelity, Toxic relationship, Excrement, Abortion, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship
Graphic: Animal death, Body shaming, Child death, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Gore, Gun violence, Homophobia, Mental illness, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Torture, Blood, Cannibalism, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Alcohol, Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Vomit, Abortion
It's dificult to rate this book.
As a piece of literature, it's good, very complex, unclear narrative, one wants to get behind the chaotic (/pos) narration. What is real, what is not? Does it even matter?
As a product to consume, it's mid. It's exhausting to read (purposefully, most likely, so good job Ellis): the gore is bloody, the animal cruelty is, well, cruel, the sexual acts (& assaults) are unbearable to read, the life of Patrick Bateman boring. You don't cheer for him. You just bear witness to what might or might not be happening. The objective and the subjective co-exist, in what way, who knows?
As a satirical work, eh. It is clearly satirical, and yet I cannot help but wonder about art and it's right to exist. Is for example fictional violence against women still violence? The same question that you consider throughout the entire book pops up: "Is all this real?"
Should it be banned - Of course not, it is art. But where does the line blur, though, because we should clearly ban works that are propaganda. But when does it start to become propaganda? And the next question you asked yourself pops up then, "does it even matter?" I don't even want to attempt to answer such a question.
I found myself skimming over the millionth description of designer outfits, expensive electronics and conversations that lack proper communication (once more, good job, Ellis, you drove the point home, i got it after the third time), questioning Patrick Bateman's train of thought and what the hell all these medications are while trying to figure out if the 'chapters' are in chronological order or not (not that it truly matters to understand the plot better, a 'yuppie' is always 27).
Yet I do enjoy these books. These books that make me think about them. So I had to give it 4 stars, even if it deserves 3 for not being a 5.
Last thoughts:
Young men idolize Pat Bateman online (due to the movie), so clearly, it is about the message, about the context of the medium that American Psycho's message - if it has one - has gotten lost (in the adaption?). Ellis himself reflects on the impact of this work at the end of my edition (the afterword includes an interview from 2012) & says that he himself was the inspiration to this book; reality clearly affects fiction, and how does fiction affect reality? Who knows.
Not my cup of tea