Take a photo of a barcode or cover
2.45 AVERAGE
2.45 AVERAGE
Esperaba encontrarme algun relato perturbador sobre terror o incluso sobre alguna experiencia traumatica y termine leyendo propaganda incel. Tiempo perdido en leer las locuras de un idiota que quizas tendria mas exito en su vida amorosa si no fuera un imbecil de primera
Did I feel like I wasted my time? No.
Was it badly written? No.
Would I recommend it to a friend? No.
Am I embarrassed to have read it in the first please? Definitely.
Was it badly written? No.
Would I recommend it to a friend? No.
Am I embarrassed to have read it in the first please? Definitely.
What utter shite was this? Blah blah I like to hurt women blah blah I fell in love blah blah. Fuck me that was the most boring, moronic piece of writing I’ve ever had the displeasure of reading. I genuinely think I’d score a dictionary higher than this piece of absolute garbage.
dark
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Loveable characters:
No
After a strong start that hooked me in right away, the book loses momentum and becomes quite tedious. The last two-thirds are rather boring honestly. There was so much potential with this idea. Two stars only for the first third of the book.
I would have rather she shot him at the end but oh well ….
Not as bad as i expected it to be, i dont like books where i cant like a main character (cough secret history cough) so the -3 stars is just out of a preference against the book - but it was well written and easy to read and definitely achieved the goal of making the main character easily hate-able
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
tense
medium-paced
1. the fact that other people seem to be shocked at the subject material of this book is frankly just hilarious to me, like, seriously?
2. my actual true gripe with this book is that it was Terribly written, chock full of disjointed paragraphs that were hard to follow, stylized as a rambling train of thought that reveals itself to be a weak attempt at stream of consciousness with no apparent benefit to the narrative
3. also just was. boring? disappointing
2. my actual true gripe with this book is that it was Terribly written, chock full of disjointed paragraphs that were hard to follow, stylized as a rambling train of thought that reveals itself to be a weak attempt at stream of consciousness with no apparent benefit to the narrative
3. also just was. boring? disappointing